• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期痴呆患者临终关怀转诊中与医生相关的差距。

Physician-Related Gaps in Hospice Referral for Patients with Advanced Dementia.

作者信息

Punchik Boris, Kaidash Nikolay, Geva Robinson Shahar, Meged-Book Tehilah, Semionov Valentina, Freud Tamar, Press Yan

机构信息

Unit for Community Geriatrics, The Haim Doron Division of Health in the Community, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Home Care Unit, Clalit Healthcare Services, Beer‑Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

Clin Interv Aging. 2025 Aug 31;20:1417-1427. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S528602. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/CIA.S528602
PMID:40919096
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12411673/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Providing essential end-of-life care for patients with advanced dementia depends on physicians' ability to identify eligible individuals and refer them to hospice services. In practice, however, such referrals are often delayed-or not made at all. This study aimed to examine the factors associated with physicians' knowledge and attitudes toward referring patients with advanced dementia to home hospice care, and to compare characteristics of those who refer with those who do not.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study assessed physicians' knowledge and attitudes regarding hospice services for patients with advanced dementia. A dedicated questionnaire was developed for the purpose of the study, based on a representative clinical case involving a patient with advanced dementia.

RESULTS

A total of 200 physicians participated in the study. While 84.3% had treated at least one patient with advanced dementia in the past six months, only 88 physicians (44.2%) reported referring to home hospice care such patients during that time. Moreover, only 6% of physicians correctly answered all four knowledge questions on the topic. No significant differences were observed between referring and non-referring physicians in terms of participation in dedicated training, knowledge level, or attitudes. Higher professional status (board certification) and the number of advanced dementia patients treated in the previous six months were the only independent predictors of referral.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed substantial gaps in the recognition of advanced dementia and in the timely referral of affected patients to hospice care among community-based family physicians and hospital-based internists. Targeted training in hospice care for all relevant physicians, coupled with structured exposure to end-stage dementia patients and hospice services during residency, may improve clinical awareness and increase the likelihood of appropriate and timely referrals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study received an exemption from the Meir Hospital Helsinki Committee.

摘要

目的

为晚期痴呆患者提供基本的临终关怀取决于医生识别符合条件的个体并将他们转介至临终关怀服务机构的能力。然而在实际操作中,此类转介往往会延迟——或者根本就不会进行。本研究旨在探讨与医生将晚期痴呆患者转介至居家临终关怀护理的知识和态度相关的因素,并比较转介者与未转介者的特征。

患者与方法

这项横断面研究评估了医生对晚期痴呆患者临终关怀服务的知识和态度。基于一个涉及晚期痴呆患者的代表性临床病例,为该研究专门设计了一份问卷。

结果

共有200名医生参与了该研究。虽然84.3%的医生在过去六个月中至少治疗过一名晚期痴呆患者,但在此期间只有88名医生(44.2%)报告将此类患者转介至居家临终关怀护理。此外,只有6%的医生正确回答了关于该主题的所有四个知识问题。在参与专门培训、知识水平或态度方面,转介医生与未转介医生之间未观察到显著差异。较高的专业地位(获得委员会认证)以及前六个月治疗的晚期痴呆患者数量是转介的唯一独立预测因素。

结论

本研究揭示了社区家庭医生和医院内科医生在识别晚期痴呆以及及时将受影响患者转介至临终关怀护理方面存在重大差距。对所有相关医生进行有针对性的临终关怀培训,以及在住院实习期间安排与晚期痴呆患者和临终关怀服务的结构化接触,可能会提高临床意识,并增加适当及时转介的可能性。

试验注册

该研究获得了梅尔医院赫尔辛基委员会的豁免。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a154/12411673/0d8fa2c9965e/CIA-20-1417-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a154/12411673/0d8fa2c9965e/CIA-20-1417-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a154/12411673/0d8fa2c9965e/CIA-20-1417-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Physician-Related Gaps in Hospice Referral for Patients with Advanced Dementia.晚期痴呆患者临终关怀转诊中与医生相关的差距。
Clin Interv Aging. 2025 Aug 31;20:1417-1427. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S528602. eCollection 2025.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
6
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
7
Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints for older people in all long-term care settings.预防和减少所有长期护理环境中老年人使用身体约束的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 28;7(7):CD007546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007546.pub3.
8
Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.晚期痴呆症的姑息治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 2;12(12):CD011513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011513.pub2.
9
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
10
Reminiscence therapy for dementia.痴呆症的回忆疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 1;3(3):CD001120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001120.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceived barriers and solutions by generalist physicians to work towards timely young-onset dementia diagnosis.一般科医生在努力实现及时诊断早发性痴呆症方面所感知的障碍和解决方案。
Aging Ment Health. 2024 Jan-Feb;28(2):262-267. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2023.2248026. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
2
End-of-life Decision-making Differs Between a Cancer and a Dementia Patient: Influences of the Physician's Background Factors.临终决策在癌症患者和痴呆症患者之间存在差异:医生背景因素的影响。
Anticancer Res. 2023 Aug;43(8):3631-3638. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.16543.
3
Level of Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Palliative Care for People with Advanced Dementia in Spain: Role of Professional and Academic Factors.
西班牙晚期痴呆症患者对姑息治疗的认知水平和态度:专业及学术因素的作用
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2022;19(11):785-794. doi: 10.2174/1567205020666221221145259.
4
Hospice vs Palliative care: A comprehensive review for primary care physician.临终关怀与姑息治疗:面向初级保健医生的全面综述
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Aug;11(8):4168-4173. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2262_21. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
5
[PILOT PROGRAM OF HOME HOSPICE FOR OLDER PEOPLE WITH ADVANCED DEMENTIA].[晚期痴呆老年人居家临终关怀试点项目]
Harefuah. 2022 May;161(5):282-287.
6
Physicians' decreased tendency to choose palliative care for patients with advanced dementia between 1999 and 2015.1999 年至 2015 年间,医生为晚期痴呆症患者选择姑息治疗的意愿降低。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Jul 26;20(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00811-5.
7
Physician Palliative Education Associated With High Use of Hospice Care Service.医生姑息治疗教育与高使用率的临终关怀服务相关。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Feb;39(2):237-242. doi: 10.1177/10499091211014160. Epub 2021 May 7.
8
Hospital at home: home-based end-of-life care.居家医院:基于家庭的临终关怀。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 16;3(3):CD009231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009231.pub3.
9
Referral criteria to specialist palliative care for patients with dementia: A systematic review.转诊标准到专科姑息治疗的痴呆患者:系统评价。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jun;69(6):1659-1669. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17070. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
10
Palliative Care in Advanced Dementia.晚期痴呆症的姑息治疗
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 21;11:699. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00699. eCollection 2020.