Ashwin Paul
Department of Educational Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
High Educ (Dordr). 2025;90(2):479-495. doi: 10.1007/s10734-024-01332-9. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
There are strong concerns about students perceiving their undergraduate education in instrumental, rather than transformational, ways. However, it is not clear whether seeing education instrumentally undermines students' capacity to see their education as transformational. Based on data from a 7-year longitudinal study of chemical engineering students from three countries, this article shows that all students focused on instrumental outcomes from education in their first year of study. However, by their final year, students tended to give instrumental accounts of what they had gained from their overall university experience and transformational accounts of what they had gained from studying their subject. This suggests that, depending on the context evoked, most students can describe instrumental or transformational relationships to their education. However, developing transformational accounts on their education appeared to be dependent on studying knowledge-rich degrees that supported them to engage with the world from the perspective of a particular body of knowledge. This raises serious questions about educational policies that imply that instrumental outcomes are the most important outcomes from students' educational experiences as such policies obscure the importance of transformational knowledge-focused relationships that change the way that students engage with the world.
人们强烈担忧学生以功利而非变革的方式看待本科教育。然而,以功利视角看待教育是否会削弱学生将教育视为变革性教育的能力,这一点尚不清楚。基于对来自三个国家的化学工程专业学生进行的为期7年的纵向研究数据,本文表明,所有学生在学习的第一年都专注于教育的功利性成果。然而,到最后一年时,学生们倾向于从功利角度阐述他们从整个大学经历中获得了什么,而从变革角度阐述他们从专业学习中获得了什么。这表明,根据所唤起的情境,大多数学生都能描述他们与教育之间的功利或变革关系。然而,对自身教育形成变革性的认识似乎依赖于学习知识丰富的学位课程,这些课程支持他们从特定知识体系的角度与世界互动。这就引发了关于教育政策的严重问题,这些政策暗示功利性成果是学生教育经历中最重要的成果,因为此类政策掩盖了以变革性知识为重点的关系的重要性,而这种关系会改变学生与世界互动的方式。