Suppr超能文献

探索患者视角在外科医生教育中的整合:认识、参与度及实施障碍

Exploring the Integration of Patient Perspectives in Surgeon Education: Awareness, Engagement and Barriers to Implementation.

作者信息

Fiskeci Vardar Hazal, Khatri Manoj, Thornber Claire, Andenmatten Kokeb, Thorley Wiedler Jane, Ghidinelli Monica

机构信息

AO Foundation, AO Education Institute, Davos Platz, Switzerland.

Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, The Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Preston, UK.

出版信息

J CME. 2025 Sep 3;14(1):2552555. doi: 10.1080/28338073.2025.2552555. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

Integrating patient perspectives in medical education is increasingly recognised as critical for patient-centred care. However, many continuing professional development (CPD) programmes - particularly in surgical education - lack a structured approach to involve the patient perspective. This study explored faculty awareness, exposure, engagement and perceived barriers to integrating patient perspectives in surgeon education. We conducted an initial interview with a surgeon educator and a patient advocate to promote awareness and inform the design of an online questionnaire to be distributed to surgeon faculty. The questionnaire assessed familiarity with patient inclusion in education, frequency of involvement in educational activities, collaboration with patient organisations and perceived importance and barriers. We received 68 responses from surgeon faculty across 32 countries. While 77.7% were familiar with the concept of patient inclusion, only 54.4% had attended education that included patient perspectives in the past 5 years and 44.1% had involved patients in designing or delivering education. The most cited barriers for patient inclusion were lack of awareness (64.7%), institutional culture (45.6%), time constraints (42.7%), and concerns about liability or ethics (36.8%). Despite perception of low current levels of integration by 85.3% of respondents, the overall importance of incorporating the patient perspective in surgical education was rated high (average 3.57/5). Suggestions for improvement included partnerships with advocacy groups, use of patient stories, and involving patients in curriculum development. We can conclude that faculty recognise the value of integrating patient perspectives in surgical education, but practical implementation in CPD remains limited. Addressing cultural, ethical and institutional barriers and promoting collaboration with patient organisations may support more meaningful and sustained integration of patient perspectives in surgical education.

摘要

将患者观点纳入医学教育越来越被认为是提供以患者为中心的医疗服务的关键。然而,许多继续职业发展(CPD)项目——尤其是外科教育领域的项目——缺乏一种纳入患者观点的结构化方法。本研究探讨了教员在将患者观点纳入外科医生教育方面的意识、接触情况、参与度以及感知到的障碍。我们首先对一位外科教育工作者和一位患者权益倡导者进行了访谈,以提高认识并为设计一份在线问卷提供信息,该问卷将分发给外科教员。问卷评估了对教育中纳入患者的熟悉程度、参与教育活动的频率、与患者组织的合作情况以及感知到的重要性和障碍。我们收到了来自32个国家的68位外科教员的回复。虽然77.7%的人熟悉患者纳入的概念,但在过去5年中,只有54.4%的人参加过包含患者观点的教育,44.1%的人让患者参与过教育的设计或实施。患者纳入最常被提及的障碍是缺乏认识(64.7%)、机构文化(45.6%)、时间限制(42.7%)以及对责任或伦理的担忧(36.8%)。尽管85.3%的受访者认为目前的整合水平较低,但将患者观点纳入外科教育的总体重要性被评为很高(平均3.57/5)。改进建议包括与倡导团体建立伙伴关系、使用患者故事以及让患者参与课程开发。我们可以得出结论,教员认识到将患者观点纳入外科教育的价值,但在继续职业发展中的实际实施仍然有限。解决文化、伦理和机构障碍以及促进与患者组织的合作可能有助于在外科教育中更有意义和持续地纳入患者观点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6880/12409885/48e060bc9934/ZJEC_A_2552555_F0001_OC.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验