Choksey Ishan, Iftikhar Nofel, Ganti Latha
Trinity Preparatory School.
University of Florida.
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2025 Sep 4;17:143577. doi: 10.52965/001c.143577. eCollection 2025.
Sports-related musculoskeletal injuries are common and represent a significant public health concern, especially among physically active individuals. These injuries are typically managed through pharmacological methods such as pain medication or through rehabilitative approaches like physical therapy (PT). While both modalities are widely used, their comparative effectiveness in promoting long-term recovery, particularly from the perspective of those injured, remains a critical area for research. # Objectives The objective of this study is to evaluate the relative effectiveness of PT and pain medication in managing sports-related injuries. Specifically, it explores pain relief outcomes, long-term recovery perceptions, and treatment preferences among individuals with prior sports injuries, using a patient-reported survey approach. # Methods This cross-sectional survey-based study involved 200 participants who had experienced a sports-related injury. Inclusion criteria for the study included being at least 18 years of age, having sustained an injury related to physical activity, and having undergone treatment involving either pain medication, physical therapy (PT), or a combination of both. Participants provided information on injury types, pain intensity immediately following the injury (measured on a 5-point Likert scale), treatment approaches, treatment duration, and their perceptions of long-term effectiveness. Data analysis was performed using JMP Pro 15. # Results The participant population, totaling 200 individuals, consisted of 99 males (49.5%) and 101 females (50.5%), with a median age of 36.5 years (range 18-88). The most frequently reported injuries were sprains (33%) and muscle strains (20%). Regarding treatment, 50% of participants used a combination of pain medication and PT, 38% relied solely on pain medication, and 12% underwent only PT. A majority (59%) rated their initial pain as severe (≥4/5). Among those treated with pain medication, 65% experienced pain recurrence once the medication's effects subsided. In contrast, 73% of PT users agreed or strongly agreed that PT provided long-term injury resolution. Additionally, 68.2% of participants who utilized both treatments indicated that PT was more effective for sustained recovery.
与运动相关的肌肉骨骼损伤很常见,是一个重大的公共卫生问题,在体育活动活跃的人群中尤为如此。这些损伤通常通过药物方法(如止痛药)或康复方法(如物理治疗(PT))来处理。虽然这两种方式都被广泛使用,但它们在促进长期恢复方面的相对有效性,特别是从受伤者的角度来看,仍然是一个关键的研究领域。# 目的 本研究的目的是评估物理治疗和止痛药在处理与运动相关损伤方面的相对有效性。具体而言,它使用患者报告的调查方法,探讨既往有运动损伤的个体的疼痛缓解结果、长期恢复认知和治疗偏好。# 方法 这项基于横断面调查的研究涉及200名有过与运动相关损伤经历的参与者。该研究的纳入标准包括年龄至少18岁、遭受过与体育活动相关的损伤,以及接受过涉及止痛药、物理治疗(PT)或两者结合的治疗。参与者提供了有关损伤类型、受伤后立即的疼痛强度(用5点李克特量表测量)、治疗方法、治疗持续时间以及他们对长期有效性的认知等信息。使用JMP Pro 15进行数据分析。# 结果 参与者总数为200人,其中男性99人(49.5%),女性101人(50.5%),中位年龄为36.5岁(范围18 - 88岁)。最常报告的损伤是扭伤(33%)和肌肉拉伤(20%)。关于治疗,50%的参与者使用了止痛药和物理治疗的组合,38%仅依赖止痛药,12%仅接受物理治疗。大多数(59%)将他们最初的疼痛评为严重(≥4/5)。在接受止痛药治疗的人中,65%在药物效果消退后经历了疼痛复发。相比之下,73%的物理治疗使用者同意或强烈同意物理治疗能实现长期损伤康复。此外,同时使用两种治疗方法的参与者中有68.2%表示物理治疗对持续恢复更有效。