Dagdelen Melike Seyda, Koc Ibrahim
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Health Ministry of the Turkish Republic, Bursa City Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye.
Department of Chest Diseases, Health Ministry of the Turkish Republic, Bursa City Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Sep 5;104(36):e44385. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044385.
Using high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure to avoid intubation raises concerns about its potential to increase mortality due to delayed intubation. Identifying at-risk patients is essential. While the literature predicts risk with oxygen-based indices (ROX, SpO2/FiO2, PaO2/FiO2), we aimed to detect ventilation insufficiency. To achieve this, we developed a simplified and modified "ventilatory ratio" (VRm), assessed its predictive value, and compared it with the ROX index. In this retrospective, observational study, patients in the intensive care unit who received high-flow nasal cannula therapy were divided into 2 groups: a failure group, consisting of those who underwent intubation, and a success group. After excluding metabolic and organic disorders that could affect ventilation (such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity hypoventilation, renal failure, and sepsis), data from 15 patients (7 non-intubated, 8 intubated) were analyzed. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of age, Apache II score, length of stay in the intensive care unit, arterial blood gas values, SpO2/FiO2 or PaO2/FiO2. The ROX index and VRm values were significantly different in both groups. The diagnostic accuracy (area under the ROC curve - AUC) of the ROX index for predicting the need for intubation was significantly high, at 0.89 (95% CI: 0.63-0.99; P < .001). The optimal cutoff value for the ROX index was ≤ 3.92. The VRm index demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of AUC = 0.93 (95% CI: 0.67-1) and was also significantly high (P < .001). The optimal cutoff value for VRm was determined to be >2.68. Comparison of ROC curves between the ROX and VRm indices was not statistically significant (z = 0.41; P = .685). The VRm index may serve as a useful additional bedside tool for predicting HFNC therapy failure in hypoxemic pneumonia patients, especially in the gray zone of the ROX index.
在低氧性呼吸衰竭患者中使用高流量鼻导管(HFNC)以避免插管引发了人们对其因延迟插管而增加死亡率的可能性的担忧。识别高危患者至关重要。虽然文献通过基于氧的指标(ROX、SpO2/FiO2、PaO2/FiO2)预测风险,但我们旨在检测通气不足。为实现这一目标,我们开发了一种简化和改良的“通气比率”(VRm),评估其预测价值,并将其与ROX指数进行比较。在这项回顾性观察研究中,接受高流量鼻导管治疗的重症监护病房患者被分为两组:失败组,由接受插管的患者组成;成功组。在排除可能影响通气的代谢和器质性疾病(如慢性阻塞性肺疾病、肥胖低通气、肾衰竭和脓毒症)后,分析了15例患者(7例未插管,8例插管)的数据。两组在年龄、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(Apache II)评分、重症监护病房住院时间、动脉血气值、SpO2/FiO2或PaO2/FiO2方面无显著差异。两组的ROX指数和VRm值均有显著差异。ROX指数预测插管需求的诊断准确性(ROC曲线下面积 - AUC)显著较高,为0.89(95%置信区间:0.63 - 0.99;P < 0.001)。ROX指数的最佳截断值为≤3.92。VRm指数的诊断准确性为AUC = 0.93(95%置信区间:0.67 - 1),也显著较高(P < 0.001)。VRm的最佳截断值确定为>2.68。ROX和VRm指数之间的ROC曲线比较无统计学意义(z = 0.41;P = 0.685)。VRm指数可能是预测低氧性肺炎患者HFNC治疗失败的一种有用的床边辅助工具,尤其是在ROX指数的灰色区域。