Memiş Zülfikar, Kuru İrem, Gök Sinem, Ongun Nedim, Topçu Adem, Karagöz Bahar, Boncuk Ulaş Sena, Demir Uğur
Department of Neurology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Istanbul Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Neurology, Antalya City Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Sep 5;104(36):e44422. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044422.
In our study, we performed both computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and digital substraction angiography (DSA) collateral artery flow scoring in anterior system acute stroke patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT) within the first 16 hours. The study aimed to evaluate the consistency of both scoring methods and their relationship with the 90-day clinical outcomes of the patients. From January to December 2022, the files of patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion who underwent MT and were followed up at a stroke center were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, laboratory parameters, Alberta stroke program early computed tomography score, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, grade of recanalization, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study III criteria), and 90-day modified Rankin Scale values were recorded. Modified Rankin Scale ≤ 2 was considered a good clinical outcome. CTA and DSA images were independently evaluated by 2 experienced neurologists. The TAN score was used for CTA collateral scoring, while the ASITN score was used for DSA collateral scoring. Fleiss Kappa coefficient was used to assess inter-rater agreement and Spearman rho coefficient was used for correlation between the scores. At 90 days, 62 patients (70%) achieved good clinical outcome. Mean CTA and DSA collateral scores were significantly higher in patients with good outcome (P < .001 for both). Inter-rater agreement was substantial (CTA: κ = 0.65 [0.518-0.775], AC1 = 0.68 [0.556-0.796]; DSA: κ = 0.59 [0.456-0.713], AC1 = 0.61 [0.489-0.732]). In multivariate analysis, DSA collateral score was independently associated with good outcome (adjusted odd ratio [aOR]: 0.01; 95% CI: 0.00-0.46; P = .02), along with admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (aOR: 5.33; 95% CI: 1.57-18.07; P = .01), and admission Alberta stroke program early computed tomography score (aOR: 0.09; 95% CI: 0.01-0.68; P = .02). In patients undergoing MT, CTA and DSA collateral score ratings are predictive of clinical outcomes at 90-day and are strongly correlated with each other.
在我们的研究中,我们对在前16小时内接受机械取栓术(MT)的前循环系统急性卒中患者进行了计算机断层血管造影(CTA)和数字减影血管造影(DSA)侧支动脉血流评分。该研究旨在评估两种评分方法的一致性及其与患者90天临床结局的关系。回顾性分析了2022年1月至12月在卒中中心接受MT并进行随访的大脑中动脉闭塞患者的病历。记录人口统计学数据、实验室参数、阿尔伯塔卒中项目早期计算机断层扫描评分、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分、再通等级、症状性颅内出血(欧洲急性卒中协作研究III标准)以及90天改良Rankin量表值。改良Rankin量表≤2被认为是良好的临床结局。CTA和DSA图像由2名经验丰富的神经科医生独立评估。CTA侧支评分采用TAN评分,而DSA侧支评分采用ASITN评分。Fleiss Kappa系数用于评估评分者间的一致性,Spearman rho系数用于评估评分之间的相关性。90天时,62例患者(70%)获得了良好的临床结局。结局良好的患者CTA和DSA侧支评分均值显著更高(两者P均< .001)。评分者间一致性较高(CTA:κ = 0.65 [0.518 - 0.775],AC1 = 0.68 [0.556 - 0.796];DSA:κ = 0.59 [0.456 - 0.713],AC1 = 0.61 [0.489 - 0.732])。多因素分析中,DSA侧支评分与良好结局独立相关(调整后的比值比[aOR]:0.01;95%置信区间[CI]:0.00 - 0.46;P = .02),同时还有入院时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分(aOR:5.33;95% CI:1.57 - 18.07;P = .01)以及入院时阿尔伯塔卒中项目早期计算机断层扫描评分(aOR:0.09;95% CI:0.01 - 0.68;P = .02)。在接受MT的患者中,CTA和DSA侧支评分可预测90天的临床结局,且彼此高度相关。