Aftab Huma, Schouw Christian H, Dargis Rimtas, Vejrum Laus K, Johansen Rikke L, Møller Josefine Tange, Madsen Tina V, Laugesen Asta Lili, Christensen Jens J, Kemp Michael, Nielsen Xiaohui C
Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
The Regional Department of Clinical Microbiology, Zealand University Hospital-Koege, Køge, Denmark.
APMIS. 2025 Sep;133(9):e70067. doi: 10.1111/apm.70067.
Sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene is an important tool in addition to conventional methods for the identification of bacterial pathogens in human infections. In polymicrobial samples, Sanger sequencing can produce uninterpretable chromatograms. This limitation can be overcome by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) of the 16S rRNA gene. We investigated the applicability of Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing of the partial 16S rRNA gene as a diagnostic routine method for pathogen detection in clinical samples. From June 2021 to August 2022, 101 clinical samples positive in PCR for partial 16S rRNA gene analysis were subjected to both Sanger and ONT sequencing. Sanger sequences were edited and compared with deposited sequences in the NCBI database using BLAST, while ONT data were processed using EPI2ME Fastq 16S. The positivity rate (clinically relevant pathogen) was higher for ONT vs. Sanger sequencing: 72% and 59%, respectively. Concordance between Sanger and ONT sequencing was 80%. Furthermore, ONT detected more samples with polymicrobial presence compared to Sanger (13 vs. 5) sequencing. Interestingly, in one joint fluid sample, Borrelia bissettiiae was identified by ONT but not by Sanger. The results show that the detection of both monobacterial and multiple bacterial species is improved using ONT.
除了传统方法外,16S核糖体RNA(rRNA)基因测序是鉴定人类感染中细菌病原体的重要工具。在多微生物样本中,桑格测序可能会产生无法解读的色谱图。16S rRNA基因的新一代测序(NGS)可以克服这一局限性。我们研究了牛津纳米孔技术(ONT)对部分16S rRNA基因进行测序作为临床样本中病原体检测的诊断常规方法的适用性。从2021年6月到2022年8月,对101份PCR检测部分16S rRNA基因呈阳性的临床样本进行了桑格测序和ONT测序。使用BLAST对桑格序列进行编辑并与NCBI数据库中存储的序列进行比较,而ONT数据则使用EPI2ME Fastq 16S进行处理。ONT测序的阳性率(临床相关病原体)高于桑格测序:分别为72%和59%。桑格测序和ONT测序之间的一致性为80%。此外,与桑格测序(5份对13份)相比,ONT检测到更多存在多种微生物的样本。有趣的是,在一份关节液样本中,ONT鉴定出了比氏疏螺旋体,而桑格测序未检测到。结果表明,使用ONT可以提高对单一细菌和多种细菌的检测能力。