Suppr超能文献

维帕他韦联合索磷布韦加或不加利巴韦林治疗失代偿期肝硬化丙型肝炎患者的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy and Safety of Velpatasvir Plus Sofosbuvir With or Without Ribavirin in Hepatitis C Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Xiao Jing, Zhang Xinnian, Mao Xiaozhou, Lai Shunhao, Li Shuangli, Sheng Yunjian

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

J Viral Hepat. 2025 Oct;32(10):e70078. doi: 10.1111/jvh.70078.

Abstract

To assess the efficacy and safety of the Velpatasvir (VEL)/Sofosbuvir (SOF) with or without Ribavirin (RBV) in treating patients with decompensated hepatitis C cirrhosis. We searched multiple databases for studies published from October 2010 to September 2024. Outcomes of interest were sustained viral response at 12 weeks (SVR12) and the safety of VEL/SOF with and without RBV regimens in patients with decompensated hepatitis C virus (HCV) cirrhosis. All statistical analyses were performed using R Statistics (4.4.1). We included 13 studies that enrolled 872 adult patients with decompensated cirrhosis due to HCV. The addition of RBV to the VEL/SOF regimen neither significantly improved SVR12 after the last dose of treatment [95.0% (366/391, 95% CI: 89.0-99.0) vs. 94.0% (442/481, 95% CI: 90.0-97.0); p = 0.92] nor decreased virologic relapse [1.0% (2/158, 95% CI: 0.0-8.0) vs. 6.0% (12/197, 95% CI: 3.0-10.0); p = 0.15]. VEL/SOF plus RBV therapy had a significantly higher rate of adverse events [92.0% (261/287, 95% CI: 88.0-95.0) vs. 47.0% (167/348, 95% CI: 24.0-71.0); p < 0.01] and death [7.0% (20/287, 95% CI: 2.0-16.0) vs. 2.0% (8/366, 95% CI: 1.0-4.0); p = 0.05]. However, for patients with genotype 3, adding RBV to the VEL/SOF regimen significantly improved SVR12 [87.0% (26/30, 95% CI: 71.0-98.0) vs. 45% (7/15, 95% CI: 13.0-79.0); p < 0.01] and decreased virologic relapse [0.0% (0/10, 95% CI: 0.0-31.0) vs. 100% (1/1, 95% CI: 2.0-100.0); p = 0.02]. VEL/SOF based therapy is a safe and effective treatment for patients with decompensated cirrhosis due to HCV. The addition of RBV to VEL/SOF may increase toxicity without achieving improved efficacy overall. However, the addition of RBV significantly increased the SVR12 rate and reduced the virologic relapse in genotype 3 patients. Trial Registration: PROSPERO database: CRD42023491852.

摘要

评估维帕他韦(VEL)/索磷布韦(SOF)联合或不联合利巴韦林(RBV)治疗失代偿期丙型肝炎肝硬化患者的疗效和安全性。我们检索了多个数据库,查找2010年10月至2024年9月发表的研究。感兴趣的结局是12周持续病毒学应答(SVR12)以及VEL/SOF联合和不联合RBV方案在失代偿期丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)肝硬化患者中的安全性。所有统计分析均使用R统计软件(4.4.1)进行。我们纳入了13项研究,共872例因HCV导致失代偿期肝硬化的成年患者。在VEL/SOF方案中加用RBV,在最后一剂治疗后既未显著提高SVR12[95.0%(366/391,95%CI:89.0 - 99.0)对94.0%(442/481,95%CI:90.0 - 97.0);p = 0.92],也未降低病毒学复发率[1.0%(2/158,95%CI:0.0 - 8.0)对6.0%(12/197,95%CI:3.0 - 10.0);p = 0.15]。VEL/SOF加RBV治疗的不良事件发生率显著更高[92.0%(261/287,95%CI:88.0 - 95.0)对47.0%(167/348,95%CI:24.0 - 71.0);p < 0.01],死亡发生率也更高[7.0%(20/287,95%CI:2.0 - 16.0)对2.0%(8/366,95%CI:1.0 - 4.0);p = 0.05]。然而,对于基因3型患者,在VEL/SOF方案中加用RBV显著提高了SVR12[87.0%(26/30,95%CI:71.0 - 98.0)对45%(7/15,95%CI:13.0 - 79.0);p < 0.01],并降低了病毒学复发率[0.0%(0/10,95%CI:0.0 - 31.0)对100%(1/1,95%CI:2.0 - 100.0);p = 0.02]。基于VEL/SOF的治疗对于因HCV导致失代偿期肝硬化的患者是一种安全有效的治疗方法。在VEL/SOF中加用RBV可能会增加毒性,且总体疗效并未提高。然而,加用RBV显著提高了基因3型患者的SVR12率并降低了病毒学复发率。试验注册:PROSPERO数据库:CRD42023491852。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验