Paliwoda Ethan D, Newman-Plotnick Harry, Ata Ashar, Buzzetta Anthony J, Post Nicole, Gildener-Leapman Neil, Kpodzo Dzifa S, Edwards Kurt, Schalet Benjamin J, Tafen Marcel
Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Albany Medical Center, 50 New Scotland Ave, NY, USA.
Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Albany Medical Center, 50 New Scotland Ave, NY, USA.
JPRAS Open. 2025 Jul 12;45:390-394. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2025.07.004. eCollection 2025 Sep.
Previous research has demonstrated disparities in access to care for patients with facial fractures. This study aimed to assess potential disparities in timing to nasal bone repositioning among hospitalized patients who received treatment.
Data from the 2017-2022 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP) and the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision codes (ICD-10) were used. The time to nasal bone repositioning was analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.
We analyzed data from 14,815 adult patients with traumatic nasal bone fractures who underwent repositioning during their index hospitalization. Within ten days of the initial presentation, 95 % of the patients underwent nasal repositioning. Black (HR = 0.90; CI = 0.85-0.95) and Asian (HR = 0.80; CI = 0.70-0.93) race, older age, private insurance (HR = 0.95; CI = 0.91-0.99), high Injury Severity Scores (ISS) (ISS 25+: HR = 0.33; CI = 0.31-0.35), specific injury mechanisms, facial fractures, and certain comorbidities were associated with statistically significantly longer times to repositioning. Treatment at a Level II trauma center (HR = 1.11; CI = 1.06-1.15), interfacility transfers (HR = 1.12; CI = 1.08-1.16), and open facial wounds were linked to statistically significantly shorter times to intervention.
In this large ACS-TQIP sample, most patients who did undergo nasal bone repositioning received it within the standard of care, with only minor timing variations based on demographic and geographic factors. In cases with higher injury severity, life-threatening injuries were prioritized before addressing nasal bone fractures. Further research should investigate initial care-access inequities in patients who experienced facial trauma but did not receive comprehensive care.
先前的研究表明,面部骨折患者在获得治疗方面存在差异。本研究旨在评估接受治疗的住院患者鼻骨复位时间的潜在差异。
使用了2017 - 2022年美国外科医师学会创伤质量改进项目(ACS - TQIP)的数据和国际疾病分类第10版编码(ICD - 10)。采用多变量Cox比例风险回归分析来分析鼻骨复位时间。
我们分析了14815例在首次住院期间接受复位的成年创伤性鼻骨骨折患者的数据。在首次就诊的十天内,95%的患者接受了鼻骨复位。黑人(风险比[HR]=0.90;置信区间[CI]=0.85 - 0.95)和亚洲人(HR = 0.80;CI = 0.70 - 0.93)种族、年龄较大、拥有私人保险(HR = 0.95;CI = 0.91 - 0.99)、高损伤严重度评分(ISS)(ISS 25+:HR = 0.33;CI = 0.31 - 0.35)、特定损伤机制、面部骨折以及某些合并症与复位时间在统计学上显著延长相关。在二级创伤中心接受治疗(HR = 1.11;CI = 1.06 - 1.15)、机构间转运(HR = 1.12;CI = 1.08 - 1.16)以及开放性面部伤口与干预时间在统计学上显著缩短相关。
在这个大型的ACS - TQIP样本中,大多数接受鼻骨复位的患者是在护理标准规定的时间内接受治疗的,仅根据人口统计学和地理因素存在微小的时间差异。在损伤严重程度较高的病例中,在处理鼻骨骨折之前优先处理危及生命的损伤。进一步的研究应调查面部创伤但未接受全面护理的患者在初始护理获取方面的不公平现象。