• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Do Disparities Exist in the Timing of Traumatic Nasal Repair?创伤性鼻修复的时机是否存在差异?
JPRAS Open. 2025 Jul 12;45:390-394. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2025.07.004. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Are There Differences in Performance Among Femoral Stem Brands Utilized in Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for Treatment of Geriatric Femoral Neck Fractures?在用于治疗老年股骨颈骨折的非骨水泥半髋关节置换术中,不同品牌的股骨柄在性能上是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 1;483(2):253-264. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003222. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Do Patients of Different Levels of Affluence Receive Different Care for Pediatric Osteosarcomas? One Institution's Experience.不同富裕程度的患者在小儿骨肉瘤治疗上是否得到不同的护理?一家机构的经验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):748-758. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003299. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
5
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
6
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
7
Are Detailed, Patient-level Social Determinant of Health Factors Associated With Physical Function and Mental Health at Presentation Among New Patients With Orthopaedic Conditions?详细的患者层面的健康社会决定因素是否与新骨科患者就诊时的身体功能和心理健康相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 May 1;481(5):912-921. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002446. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
8
What Factors Are Associated With Implant Revision in the Treatment of Pathologic Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures?在病理性股骨转子下骨折的治疗中,哪些因素与植入物翻修相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):473-484. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003291. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
9
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
10
Do Gunshot and Explosion Injuries Differ in Severity and Management? A Multicenter Study of Upper Extremity Trauma in the 2023 Israel-Gaza Conflict.枪伤和爆炸伤在严重程度及处理上有差异吗?2023年以色列-加沙冲突中上肢创伤的多中心研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003618.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of Facial Fractures at Safety-Net Hospitals: A National Analysis of Inpatient Burden and Cost.安全网医院面部骨折的治疗:住院负担和成本的全国性分析。
J Craniofac Surg. 2021 Jun 1;32(4):1413-1416. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007573.
2
Contemporary Characterization of Injury Patterns, Initial Management, and Disparities in Treatment of Facial Fractures Using the National Trauma Data Bank.利用国家创伤数据库对面部骨折的损伤模式、初始处理及治疗差异进行当代特征分析。
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Oct;30(7):2052-2056. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005862.
3
Etiology of Nasal Bone Fractures.鼻骨骨折的病因
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 May;28(3):785-788. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003477.
4
Are Older Adults With Hip Fractures Disadvantaged in Level 1 Trauma Centers?髋部骨折的老年人在一级创伤中心是否处于劣势?
Med Care. 2016 Jun;54(6):616-22. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000535.

创伤性鼻修复的时机是否存在差异?

Do Disparities Exist in the Timing of Traumatic Nasal Repair?

作者信息

Paliwoda Ethan D, Newman-Plotnick Harry, Ata Ashar, Buzzetta Anthony J, Post Nicole, Gildener-Leapman Neil, Kpodzo Dzifa S, Edwards Kurt, Schalet Benjamin J, Tafen Marcel

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Albany Medical Center, 50 New Scotland Ave, NY, USA.

Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Albany Medical Center, 50 New Scotland Ave, NY, USA.

出版信息

JPRAS Open. 2025 Jul 12;45:390-394. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2025.07.004. eCollection 2025 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpra.2025.07.004
PMID:40922731
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12414286/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous research has demonstrated disparities in access to care for patients with facial fractures. This study aimed to assess potential disparities in timing to nasal bone repositioning among hospitalized patients who received treatment.

METHODS

Data from the 2017-2022 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP) and the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision codes (ICD-10) were used. The time to nasal bone repositioning was analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 14,815 adult patients with traumatic nasal bone fractures who underwent repositioning during their index hospitalization. Within ten days of the initial presentation, 95 % of the patients underwent nasal repositioning. Black (HR = 0.90; CI = 0.85-0.95) and Asian (HR = 0.80; CI = 0.70-0.93) race, older age, private insurance (HR = 0.95; CI = 0.91-0.99), high Injury Severity Scores (ISS) (ISS 25+: HR = 0.33; CI = 0.31-0.35), specific injury mechanisms, facial fractures, and certain comorbidities were associated with statistically significantly longer times to repositioning. Treatment at a Level II trauma center (HR = 1.11; CI = 1.06-1.15), interfacility transfers (HR = 1.12; CI = 1.08-1.16), and open facial wounds were linked to statistically significantly shorter times to intervention.

CONCLUSION

In this large ACS-TQIP sample, most patients who did undergo nasal bone repositioning received it within the standard of care, with only minor timing variations based on demographic and geographic factors. In cases with higher injury severity, life-threatening injuries were prioritized before addressing nasal bone fractures. Further research should investigate initial care-access inequities in patients who experienced facial trauma but did not receive comprehensive care.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,面部骨折患者在获得治疗方面存在差异。本研究旨在评估接受治疗的住院患者鼻骨复位时间的潜在差异。

方法

使用了2017 - 2022年美国外科医师学会创伤质量改进项目(ACS - TQIP)的数据和国际疾病分类第10版编码(ICD - 10)。采用多变量Cox比例风险回归分析来分析鼻骨复位时间。

结果

我们分析了14815例在首次住院期间接受复位的成年创伤性鼻骨骨折患者的数据。在首次就诊的十天内,95%的患者接受了鼻骨复位。黑人(风险比[HR]=0.90;置信区间[CI]=0.85 - 0.95)和亚洲人(HR = 0.80;CI = 0.70 - 0.93)种族、年龄较大、拥有私人保险(HR = 0.95;CI = 0.91 - 0.99)、高损伤严重度评分(ISS)(ISS 25+:HR = 0.33;CI = 0.31 - 0.35)、特定损伤机制、面部骨折以及某些合并症与复位时间在统计学上显著延长相关。在二级创伤中心接受治疗(HR = 1.11;CI = 1.06 - 1.15)、机构间转运(HR = 1.12;CI = 1.08 - 1.16)以及开放性面部伤口与干预时间在统计学上显著缩短相关。

结论

在这个大型的ACS - TQIP样本中,大多数接受鼻骨复位的患者是在护理标准规定的时间内接受治疗的,仅根据人口统计学和地理因素存在微小的时间差异。在损伤严重程度较高的病例中,在处理鼻骨骨折之前优先处理危及生命的损伤。进一步的研究应调查面部创伤但未接受全面护理的患者在初始护理获取方面的不公平现象。