Miltenberg Benjamin, Linton Alexander, Abe Elizabeth, Martinazzi Brandon J, Furey Gabriel, Johns William L, Sherman Matthew B, Purtill James J, Smith Eric B
Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA.
Orthopaedics, The Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA.
Cureus. 2025 Aug 7;17(8):e89572. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89572. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Introduction Patients have identified knee stiffness as a factor contributing to postoperative dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Losartan is an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) that has demonstrated antifibrotic effects; however, the impact of perioperative losartan on arthrofibrosis after TKA is not well understood. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine if losartan exhibits antifibrotic benefits in patients who undergo TKA by decreasing the rates of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), when compared to patients who are not taking losartan. Methods All patients who underwent primary TKA by fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons at a single institution from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2023 were identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code (27447). Patient demographic and surgery-specific information was collected. Patients were grouped into cohorts based on the presence of a patient-reported active prescription for losartan in the perioperative period. A 3:1 propensity match was performed. The two cohorts underwent matching based on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor prescription, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor usage, age, sex, body mass index, and race. Postoperative rates of MUA (CPT 27570) and MUA with lysis of adhesions (LOA) (CPT 29884) were calculated, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores were collected. Results Twenty-seven thousand two hundred and twenty patients who underwent primary TKA within the study period were identified. Prior to propensity matching, 25,219/27,220 (92.6%) did not have a prescription for losartan within the perioperative period and 2,001/27,220 (7.4%) had a prescription for losartan within the perioperative period. After propensity matching, cohorts consisted of 6,024 patients who did not have a prescription for losartan within the perioperative period and 2,008 patients who had a prescription for losartan. There was no significant difference in the rate of MUA between patients with (74/2,008 - 3.69%) or without (240/6,024 - 3.98%) a prescription for losartan (X (1, N = 8032) = 0.3, p = 0.60). Additionally, there was no difference in the rate of MUA with LOA between patients with (12/2,008 - 0.60%) or without (18/6,024 - 0.30%) a prescription for losartan (X (1, N = 8032) = 2.9, p = 0.09). The odds ratio for MUA and MUA with LOA between groups was 1.08 (95% confidence interval 0.8 to 1.4; p = 0.55) and 0.50 (95% confidence interval 0.2-1.0p = 0.06), respectively. Additionally, there was no significant difference between groups with regard to postoperative KOOS, PCS, or MCS scores. Conclusions There are similar rates of MUA after primary TKA during the first postoperative year in patients with and without a prescription for losartan. However, this should be interpreted with caution as we are underpowered to detect small differences for this relatively rare outcome. Additionally, we found no difference in postoperative KOOS, PCS, and MCS between patients taking losartan and those not taking losartan. Despite the antifibrotic properties of losartan, its clinical impact on arthrofibrosis after TKA may be limited.
引言 患者已将膝关节僵硬视为全膝关节置换术(TKA)后导致术后不满意的一个因素。氯沙坦是一种已显示出抗纤维化作用的血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB);然而,围手术期使用氯沙坦对TKA后关节纤维化的影响尚不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是确定与未服用氯沙坦的患者相比,氯沙坦是否能通过降低麻醉下手法操作(MUA)的发生率,在接受TKA的患者中展现出抗纤维化益处。
方法 通过当前操作术语(CPT)代码(27447)识别出2020年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间在单一机构由接受过专科培训的关节置换外科医生进行初次TKA的所有患者。收集患者的人口统计学和手术相关信息。根据患者报告的围手术期氯沙坦有效处方的情况将患者分组。进行了3:1的倾向匹配。两组根据血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂处方、环氧化酶-2(COX-2)抑制剂使用情况、年龄、性别、体重指数和种族进行匹配。计算术后MUA(CPT 27570)和伴有粘连松解(LOA)的MUA(CPT 29884)的发生率,并收集膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(KOOS)、疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)和心理成分总结(MCS)评分。
结果 在研究期间确定了27220例接受初次TKA的患者。在倾向匹配之前,25219/27220(92.6%)在围手术期没有氯沙坦处方,2001/27220(7.4%)在围手术期有氯沙坦处方。倾向匹配后,两组分别包括6024例围手术期没有氯沙坦处方的患者和2008例有氯沙坦处方的患者。有氯沙坦处方的患者(74/2008 - 3.69%)和没有氯沙坦处方的患者(240/6024 - 3.98%)之间的MUA发生率没有显著差异(X(1,N = 8032)= 0.3,p = 0.60)。此外,有氯沙坦处方的患者(12/2008 - 0.60%)和没有氯沙坦处方的患者(1 /6024 - 0.30%)之间伴有LOA的MUA发生率也没有差异(X(1,N = 8032)= 2.9,p = 0.09)。两组之间MUA和伴有LOA的MUA的优势比分别为1.08(95%置信区间0.8至1.4;p = 0.55)和分别为0.50(95%置信区间0.2 - 1.0,p = 0.06)。此外,两组在术后KOOS、PCS或MCS评分方面没有显著差异。
结论 在初次TKA后的第一年,有氯沙坦处方和没有氯沙坦处方的患者的MUA发生率相似。然而,由于我们检测这种相对罕见结局的微小差异的能力不足,对此应谨慎解释。此外,我们发现服用氯沙坦的患者和未服用氯沙坦的患者在术后KOOS、PCS和MCS方面没有差异。尽管氯沙坦具有抗纤维化特性,但其对TKA后关节纤维化的临床影响可能有限。