Jiang Qiuting, Xu Liang, Zhou Wei, Fu Lianlian, Zou Chang, Lou Hui, Yao Yake, Zhou Hua, Yang Xiaoyan
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Linping Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Hangzhou, 311100, People's Republic of China.
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China.
Infect Drug Resist. 2025 Sep 3;18:4621-4631. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S542063. eCollection 2025.
Multiple studies have confirmed that viral pneumonia is a high-risk factor for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), this retrospective study aims to analyze the differences in clinical characteristics, prognosis, and high-risk factors for mortality between patients with influenza virus-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (IAPA) and those with COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA).
Clinical data from IAPA and CAPA patients diagnosed at four hospitals were collected. The clinical characteristics and prognostic differences between the two groups were analyzed and compared, with Cox regression used to identify the risk factors for mortality.
A total of 106 patients were included in this study. Compared to CAPA patients, IAPA patients had a higher proportion of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease comorbidities, lower rates of history of solid organ transplantation, and a shorter time from viral infection to aspergillosis development. CAPA patients exhibited lower levels of white blood cells, and C-reactive protein. The CAPA group also received longer courses of antibiotic and corticosteroid therapy. Compared to IAPA, the CAPA group exhibited a higher incidence of complications, including bacterial infections, deep vein thrombosis in the lower limbs, gastrointestinal bleeding, and heart failure. The mortality rate was also higher in the CAPA group. The survival curve of IAPA was more favorable than that of CAPA. Cox regression analysis identified ICU admission at diagnosis as an independent risk factor for mortality in IAPA patients (OR= 9.578).
The IAPA group had a higher proportion of patients with COPD, a more acute disease onset, Admission to the ICU at diagnosis was identified as a risk factor for IAPA-related mortality. In comparison, the CAPA group had a higher proportion of immunodeficient patients, received more corticosteroid treatment, and was more susceptible to complications such as bacterial infections, thrombosis, and gastrointestinal bleeding, all of which contributed to an increased risk of death.
多项研究证实病毒性肺炎是侵袭性肺曲霉病(IPA)的高危因素,本回顾性研究旨在分析流感病毒相关肺曲霉病(IAPA)患者与新型冠状病毒肺炎相关肺曲霉病(CAPA)患者在临床特征、预后及死亡高危因素方面的差异。
收集四家医院诊断的IAPA和CAPA患者的临床资料。分析比较两组的临床特征和预后差异,采用Cox回归分析确定死亡危险因素。
本研究共纳入106例患者。与CAPA患者相比,IAPA患者慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并症比例更高,实体器官移植史发生率更低,从病毒感染到曲霉病发生的时间更短。CAPA患者白细胞和C反应蛋白水平较低。CAPA组接受抗生素和糖皮质激素治疗的疗程也更长。与IAPA相比,CAPA组并发症发生率更高,包括细菌感染、下肢深静脉血栓形成、胃肠道出血和心力衰竭。CAPA组的死亡率也更高。IAPA的生存曲线比CAPA更有利。Cox回归分析确定诊断时入住重症监护病房是IAPA患者死亡的独立危险因素(OR = 9.578)。
IAPA组慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者比例更高,起病更急,诊断时入住重症监护病房是IAPA相关死亡的危险因素。相比之下,CAPA组免疫缺陷患者比例更高,接受更多糖皮质激素治疗,更容易发生细菌感染、血栓形成和胃肠道出血等并发症,所有这些都导致死亡风险增加。