Suppr超能文献

囊状未破裂颅内动脉瘤的血流导向治疗:一项聚焦于研究质量和初始结果的系统评价

Flow diverter treatment for saccular unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review focussing on study quality and initial outcomes.

作者信息

Wenz Fabian, Wiedemann Tamara, Rinkel Gabriel Je, Etminan Nima

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Stroke J. 2025 Sep 9:23969873251370992. doi: 10.1177/23969873251370992.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Flow-diverting (FD) stents are increasingly used to treat small, unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA), but high-quality, unbiased data on initial complications and clinical outcomes were limited in previous literature reviews. We updated the literature review to assess quality, potential bias, complications and short-term outcomes in studies on FD-stents for UIAs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library until January 9, 2025 for studies on FD-stents for UIAs. We assessed methodological quality using the methodological index for non-randomised studies (poor: 0-9, moderate: 10-13, good: 14-16), and financial conflicts of interest. The primary outcome was neurological outcome according to a validated outcome scale at 1-3 months after treatment. Secondary outcomes were clinical worsening and complications.

RESULTS

We included 13 studies with 743 patients and 806 UIAs, of which 88.4% (95% CI: 85.7%-91.2%) were <10 mm. All studies were uncontrolled. The methodological quality was poor in six and moderate in seven studies. Financial conflicts of interest were reported in six studies. At 1-3 months after treatment, the proportion of patients were for mRS ⩾1 13.3% (95% CI: 10.0%-16.6%), mRS ⩾2 5.3% (95% CI: 3.2%-7.5%), mRS ⩾3 2.4% (95% CI: 0.1%-3.9%) and neurological worsening 3.1% (95% CI: 1.5%-4.6%). Complications within 3 months occurred in 12.7% (95% CI: 10.3%-15.0%).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The literature on FD-stents is methodologically weak and potentially biased by financial interests but still shows relevant proportions of complications and post-treatment morbidity. Currently, there are no good data supporting the use of FD-stents for UIAs where standard treatment options are available. Randomised-controlled trials are needed to compare safety, efficacy and durability between FD-stents and coiling or clipping.

摘要

引言

血流导向(FD)支架越来越多地用于治疗小型未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIA),但在以往的文献综述中,关于初始并发症和临床结局的高质量、无偏倚数据有限。我们更新了文献综述,以评估FD支架治疗UIA的研究中的质量、潜在偏倚、并发症和短期结局。

患者和方法

我们系统检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,直至2025年1月9日,以查找关于FD支架治疗UIA的研究。我们使用非随机研究的方法学指数(差:0-9,中等:10-13,好:14-16)和财务利益冲突来评估方法学质量。主要结局是治疗后1-3个月根据经过验证的结局量表得出的神经学结局。次要结局是临床恶化和并发症。

结果

我们纳入了13项研究,共743例患者和806个UIA,其中88.4%(95%CI:85.7%-91.2%)小于10mm。所有研究均为非对照研究。6项研究的方法学质量差,7项研究为中等。6项研究报告了财务利益冲突。治疗后1-3个月,改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分≥1的患者比例为13.3%(95%CI:10.0%-16.6%),mRS评分≥2的患者比例为5.3%(95%CI:3.2%-7.5%),mRS评分≥3的患者比例为2.4%(95%CI:0.1%-3.9%),神经功能恶化的患者比例为3.1%(95%CI:1.5%-4.6%)。3个月内并发症的发生率为12.7%(95%CI:10.3%-15.0%)。

讨论与结论

关于FD支架的文献在方法学上存在缺陷,可能受到财务利益的影响,但仍显示出一定比例的并发症和治疗后发病率。目前,没有良好的数据支持在有标准治疗选择的情况下使用FD支架治疗UIA。需要进行随机对照试验来比较FD支架与弹簧圈栓塞或夹闭术在安全性、有效性和耐久性方面的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d450/12420651/421a598f6ccd/10.1177_23969873251370992-img2.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验