• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量关怀科学:一种以患者为中心的关怀互动预测模型。

Measuring the Science of Caring: A Patient-Centred Predictive Model for the Caring Interaction.

作者信息

Allande-Cussó Regina, Pinero-De Plaza María Alejandra, Gómez-Salgado Juan, Porcel-Gálvez Ana María

机构信息

Department of Nursing, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.

Caring Future Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Scand J Caring Sci. 2025 Sep;39(3):e70110. doi: 10.1111/scs.70110.

DOI:10.1111/scs.70110
PMID:40923645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12418724/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The nurse-patient relationship is central to quality nursing care, yet its impact remains difficult to quantify. While existing models assess caring competencies from the perspective of nursing students and professionals, there is a lack of validated instruments incorporating direct patient feedback.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop and validate the Nursing Interaction in Caring_Competence Assessment-Patient (NIC_CA-Patient) tool, a patient-centred instrument designed to measure caring interaction in nursing practice and establish a predictive model of its development from the patient's perspective.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in eight hospitals within the Andalusian Health Care System, involving 1060 patients admitted to internal medicine units. The NIC_CA-Patient tool was adapted from the Caring Nurse-Patient Interactions (CNPI) scale and validated through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM).

RESULTS

The final model identified three key dimensions-therapeutic relationship, problem management and adaptation-explaining 79% of the variance in patient-reported experiences. The predictive model demonstrated strong reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.97) and excellent model fit indices (SRMR = 0.03, AVE > 0.7).

CONCLUSION

The NIC_CA-Patient tool provides a quantifiable and predictive measure of caring interaction from the patient's perspective. Its implementation in clinical practice and research can enhance patient-centred care by identifying relational factors that improve health outcomes and patient experience.

摘要

背景

护患关系是优质护理的核心,但它的影响仍难以量化。虽然现有模型从护理专业学生和专业人员的角度评估关怀能力,但缺乏纳入患者直接反馈的经过验证的工具。

目的

本研究旨在开发并验证以患者为中心的“护理关怀能力评估-患者版”(NIC_CA-Patient)工具,该工具旨在衡量护理实践中的关怀互动,并从患者角度建立其发展的预测模型。

方法

在安达卢西亚医疗保健系统的八家医院进行了一项横断面研究,涉及1060名入住内科病房的患者。NIC_CA-Patient工具改编自“关怀护患互动”(CNPI)量表,并通过探索性因子分析(EFA)和偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)进行验证。

结果

最终模型确定了三个关键维度——治疗关系、问题管理和适应——解释了患者报告体验中79%的方差。预测模型显示出很强的可靠性(Cronbach's α = 0.97)和出色的模型拟合指数(SRMR = 0.03,AVE > 0.7)。

结论

NIC_CA-Patient工具从患者角度提供了一种可量化和预测性的关怀互动测量方法。在临床实践和研究中实施该工具可以通过识别改善健康结果和患者体验的关系因素来加强以患者为中心的护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2524/12418724/70c9ae0bc4fb/SCS-39-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2524/12418724/70c9ae0bc4fb/SCS-39-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2524/12418724/70c9ae0bc4fb/SCS-39-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring the Science of Caring: A Patient-Centred Predictive Model for the Caring Interaction.衡量关怀科学:一种以患者为中心的关怀互动预测模型。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2025 Sep;39(3):e70110. doi: 10.1111/scs.70110.
2
The COMCARE Framework for Person-Centred Communication-A Practical Caring Framework.以患者为中心沟通的COMCARE框架——一个实用的关怀框架。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2025 Sep;39(3):e70074. doi: 10.1111/scs.70074.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
The Italian validation of the Watson Caritas Co-Worker Score for nurses and health care professionals.
Appl Nurs Res. 2025 Oct;85:151990. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2025.151990. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
5
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
6
Development and psychometric validation of the Nurse-Patient Therapeutic Interaction Scale (NuPTIS).
Nurse Educ Pract. 2025 Aug;87:104478. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104478. Epub 2025 Jul 22.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the training needs assessment for critical care nurses.重症监护护士培训需求评估波斯语版本的心理测量学特性
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Aug 7;25(1):1149. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07657-y.
9
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
10
Current Status and Influencing Factors of Chinese Nurses' Compassion Competence: A Cross-Sectional Study.中国护士共情能力的现状及影响因素:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2025 Jun;31(3):e70031. doi: 10.1111/ijn.70031.

本文引用的文献

1
Human-centred AI for emergency cardiac care: Evaluating RAPIDx AI with PROLIFERATE_AI.用于紧急心脏护理的以人为本的人工智能:使用PROLIFERATE_AI评估RAPIDx人工智能。
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Apr;196:105810. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105810. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
2
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Participants.《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言:涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则》
JAMA. 2025 Jan 7;333(1):71-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.21972.
3
The Caring Life Course Theory: Opening new frontiers in care-A cardiac rehabilitation example.
关爱生命历程理论:开拓护理新领域——以心脏康复为例
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Aug;81(8):5163-5180. doi: 10.1111/jan.16312. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
4
Care biography: A concept analysis.关怀传记:概念分析。
Nurs Philos. 2024 Jul;25(3):e12489. doi: 10.1111/nup.12489.
5
Measurement properties of utility-based health-related quality of life measures in cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention programs: a systematic review.基于效用的健康相关生活质量测量在心脏康复和二级预防计划中的测量特性:系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Sep;33(9):2299-2320. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03657-5. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
6
Hearing the patient voice: a qualitative interview study exploring the patient experience of a nurse-led initiative to integrate and enhance primary and secondary healthcare pathways.倾听患者声音:一项质性访谈研究,探索患者对一项由护士主导的整合并强化初级和二级医疗保健路径举措的体验。
Integr Healthc J. 2022 Apr 10;4(1):e000067. doi: 10.1136/ihj-2020-000067. eCollection 2022.
7
The comparison data forest: A new comparison data approach to determine the number of factors in exploratory factor analysis.比较数据森林:探索性因素分析中确定因素数量的一种新的比较数据方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):1838-1851. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02122-4. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
8
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in radiology: embracing the metrics of change.
Clin Radiol. 2023 Aug;78(8):565-567. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2023.03.007. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
9
Co-designing, measuring, and optimizing innovations and solutions within complex adaptive health systems.在复杂适应性卫生系统中共同设计、衡量并优化创新与解决方案。
Front Health Serv. 2023 Mar 31;3:1154614. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1154614. eCollection 2023.
10
Selecting and Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures to Assess Health System Performance.选择和实施患者报告的结局和体验测量指标来评估卫生系统绩效。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Apr 1;3(4):e220326. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0326.