Imaging characteristics, surgical efficacy and treatment strategies for Type IIIa atlantoaxial rotatory dislocation: a retrospective comparative study with Type III.

PURPOSE

To investigate the images and treatment differences for Type IIIa atlantoaxial rotary dislocation (AARD) by comparing the imaging characteristics of patients with Type III and Type IIIa AARD.

METHODS

The present study retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 35 patients who underwent posterior C1-C2 intra-articular fusion due to AARD from our hospital database. Among them, 23 patients were diagnosed with Type III AARD, while the remaining 12 patients were diagnosed with Type IIIa AARD. The imaging characteristics and clinical data were reviewed and compared.

RESULTS

Type III AARD demonstrated significantly greater traction reducibility than Type IIIa (18/23 vs. 4/12 cases, P < 0.05), with longer operative times required for Type IIIa (P < 0.05). All patients achieved successful fusion without complications, showing significant Visual Analog Scale Score for Neck Pain (VASSNP) improvement (P < 0.05) but unchanged Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores. Radiographically, Type IIIa exhibited higher C2 facet deformity rates (10/12 vs. 9/23), more severe Ishii Grade III involvement, and larger C1-C2 separation angle (SEA)/lateral inclination angle (LIA) measurements (P < 0.05), while atlanto-dens interval (ADI), C2-C7 angle, and T1-slope (T1S) showed no intergroup differences. The SEA has a significant positive correlation with the LIA (r = 0.711, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, compared to Type III AARD, Type IIIa AARD exhibits a larger SEA and LIA, rendering it more susceptible to C2 facet joint deformities and consequently posing greater challenges during surgical reduction of the atlantoaxial joint.