Boye Kristina S, Lage Maureen J, Terrell Kendra A, Thieu Vivian T
Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, 893 Delaware Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46225, USA.
HealthMetrics Outcomes Research, 28 Riverside Lane, Madison, CT, 06443, USA.
Diabetes Ther. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1007/s13300-025-01793-w.
This study examines the characteristics of adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who were not initially treated with an antihyperglycemic agent (AHA).
The analyses used Optum de-identified Market Clarity data from January 2013 through September 2023. The US study included nonpregnant adults with T2D who were continuously insured from 1 year prior through 5 years post diagnosis and did not fill a prescription for an AHA in the year after their initial T2D diagnosis. Differences between those treated in years 2-5 with an AHA (delayed treatment) and those untreated with an AHA for 5 years post diagnosis (untreated) were examined descriptively and using multivariable analyses.
Out of 186,259 adults with T2D, 56.7% (N = 105,533) did not fill a prescription for an AHA in the year after diagnosis and were included in the study. Of these 105,533 adults (mean age 59.6 years; 51.4% female), 75.0% were untreated for the entire 5 years post diagnosis. In the delayed treatment group, metformin was the most common first-line therapy (72.9%), and 83.0% of those who initiated monotherapy never received additional classes of AHAs. Compared to the delayed treatment group, the untreated group had significantly higher rates of incident cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause direct total costs ($118,191 vs $108,687; P < 0.05).
Over 50% of adults diagnosed with T2D were untreated with an AHA in the first year post diagnosis, and most of those who went untreated the first year remained untreated after 5 years. Among the delayed treatment patients, the majority did not use additional AHA classes besides their index therapy in the post-period. These findings suggest that therapeutic inertia affects a significant percentage of individuals with T2D. Given the untreated group's significantly worse cardiovascular outcomes and higher medical costs, these findings highlight a potential unmet need in the years immediately following T2D diagnosis.
本研究调查了未初始接受抗高血糖药物(AHA)治疗的2型糖尿病(T2D)成人患者的特征。
分析使用了Optum公司2013年1月至2023年9月的去识别化市场透明度数据。美国的这项研究纳入了非妊娠的T2D成人患者,他们在确诊前1年至确诊后5年持续参保,且在初次诊断为T2D后的1年内未开具AHA处方。对在第2至5年接受AHA治疗(延迟治疗)的患者与确诊后5年未接受AHA治疗(未治疗)的患者之间的差异进行了描述性分析和多变量分析。
在186,259例T2D成人患者中,56.7%(N = 105,533)在诊断后的1年内未开具AHA处方,并被纳入研究。在这105,533例成人患者(平均年龄59.6岁;51.4%为女性)中,75.0%在确诊后的整个5年期间未接受治疗。在延迟治疗组中,二甲双胍是最常见的一线治疗药物(72.9%),且开始单药治疗的患者中有83.0%从未接受过其他类别的AHA治疗。与延迟治疗组相比,未治疗组的心血管事件发生率和全因直接总成本显著更高(118,191美元对108,687美元;P < 0.05)。
超过50%的T2D成人患者在确诊后的第1年未接受AHA治疗,且大多数第1年未接受治疗的患者在5年后仍未接受治疗。在延迟治疗的患者中,大多数在随访期除了初始治疗外未使用其他类别的AHA。这些发现表明治疗惰性影响了相当比例的T2D患者。鉴于未治疗组的心血管结局明显更差且医疗成本更高,这些发现凸显了T2D诊断后立即出现的潜在未满足需求。