Bongaerts Brenda, Leuwer Anna, Sadiq Fayola, Wolters Benedikt, Guo Yang, Tapinova Karina, Alade Omolola T, Janka Heidrun, Franco Juan Va
Cochrane Evidence Synthesis Unit Germany/UK - Sub-Unit Düsseldorf, Institute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Sep 10;9(9):CD016214. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016214.
In order to improve the outcomes of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), access to and quality of comprehensive acute and chronic care services in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) must be improved.
To identify and summarise the characteristics of models of care for T1DM in children and adolescents in LMIC.
We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Index Medicus from inception to 11 December 2023 without restrictions.
We conducted a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. We included all study types describing the implemented organisation (setting, healthcare facilities, financial resources) and delivery of T1DM care (treatment, self-management support, clinical monitoring) for the management of T1DM in children and adolescents in LMIC.
Two review authors independently screened and selected eligible studies, and charted relevant data from the included studies. The charted data were presented in a descriptive format.
We included 40 studies that described models for T1DM care in 19 LMICs across the different WHO regions. African Region We identified models of care in Cameroon, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda, largely supported by international initiatives like Changing Diabetes in Children (CDiC) and Life for a Child (LFAC). Models were implemented between 2004 and 2012, and aimed to enhance infrastructure and care delivery, including access to insulin, glucose monitoring supplies, and diabetes education for patients and caregivers. Multidisciplinary teams provided care across urban and rural settings, with some countries offering tele-support and diabetes camps. Financial and logistical barriers persisted despite governmental and humanitarian support. Region of the Americas We identified models of care in Brazil and Cuba, focusing on reducing complications, training human resources, and supporting psychosocial development. In Brazil, care was delivered at a secondary-level facility by a multidisciplinary team. In Cuba, care was provided by a tertiary-level childhood diabetes clinic. Both models emphasised diabetes education for patients and families, regular specialist consultations, and community awareness initiatives. Unique features included holiday camps in Cuba and internship programs for healthcare professionals in Brazil. Diabetes care in Brazil was free, with additional resources for those in need. South-East Asia Region We identified models of care in Bangladesh, India, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, and Thailand, with implementation between 2009 and 2015. These models aimed to improve access to care, self-management education, and awareness amongst healthcare workers and communities, particularly for children below the poverty line. Supported by initiatives such as CDiC, LFAC, and Action4Diabetes (A4D), the models delivered outpatient care through multidisciplinary teams, providing free insulin and supplies in most countries. Regular HbA1c monitoring, diabetes education, and psychological support were key components, along with community awareness initiatives in four countries. Financial barriers remained significant, particularly in Bangladesh and Thailand. European Region We identified models of care in Kazakhstan and Turkey, aiming to provide comprehensive diabetes care and improve patient well-being. In Kazakhstan, care included free insulin, glucose meters and test strips, and a monitoring system for hypoglycaemia and diabetic ketoacidosis was in place. Turkey's National Childhood Diabetes Program, initiated from 1994 onwards, delivered care through multidisciplinary healthcare teams and included initiatives like the Diabetes at School Program to raise awareness. Financial barriers persisted in both countries concerning certain supplies and technologies. Eastern Mediterranean Region We identified a model of care in Morocco, implemented in 1986, that had expanded from a single tertiary-level facility to nine provincial secondary-level hospitals, covering a third of the country's young patients with T1DM. Care was delivered by multidisciplinary teams and included initial in-hospital treatment, followed by outpatient consultations every three months. Education in self-management was emphasised, with group sessions, holiday camps, and tailored resources for illiterate parents. A database system supported electronic data monitoring. Financial support was provided for low-income families through sponsors and associations, although insurance coverage was limited to insulin costs. Western Pacific Region We identified models of care for Cambodia, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Laos, supported by the A4D program. T1DM care included free insulin, glucose meters, HbA1c testing, and emergency funds, with care delivered through tertiary and secondary-level facilities, except in Vietnam where a single tertiary-level clinic provided care. Multidisciplinary teams were present in Cambodia, Malaysia, and Vietnam, but not in Laos. Screening for diabetes complications varied, with the most comprehensive screening offered in Cambodia and Laos. Ongoing diabetes training for healthcare workers, and electronic patient databases were integral to the model of care. Financial barriers persisted in Laos, where certain screening assessments required out-of-pocket payment.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In many countries included in this review, substantial improvements in T1DM care have been made, particularly through international partnerships. However, the sustainability, consistency, and comprehensiveness of care remain a consistent challenge for further improving life expectancy and quality of life for children and adolescents with T1DM.
World Health Organization (WHO) REGISTRATION: Registration: OSF, via doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JZ65G.
为改善1型糖尿病(T1DM)儿童和青少年的治疗效果,低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)必须提高综合急性和慢性护理服务的可及性和质量。
确定并总结LMIC中T1DM儿童和青少年护理模式的特点。
我们检索了MEDLINE、Scopus、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)以及世界卫生组织(WHO)全球医学索引,检索时间从数据库建立至2023年12月11日,无任何限制。
我们按照乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的指南进行了范围综述。我们纳入了所有描述为LMIC中T1DM儿童和青少年提供护理的实施组织(环境、医疗设施、财政资源)和护理提供(治疗、自我管理支持、临床监测)的研究类型。
两位综述作者独立筛选并选择符合条件的研究,并从纳入研究中提取相关数据。提取的数据以描述性格式呈现。
我们纳入了40项研究,这些研究描述了世卫组织不同区域19个LMIC中T1DM的护理模式。非洲区域 我们在喀麦隆、肯尼亚、卢旺达、坦桑尼亚和乌干达确定了护理模式,这些模式主要由“儿童糖尿病改变”(CDiC)和“儿童生命”(LFAC)等国际倡议提供支持。这些模式在2004年至2012年期间实施,旨在加强基础设施和护理提供,包括为患者和护理人员提供胰岛素、血糖监测用品以及糖尿病教育。多学科团队在城乡环境中提供护理,一些国家提供远程支持和糖尿病营。尽管有政府和人道主义支持,但财政和后勤障碍仍然存在。美洲区域 我们在巴西和古巴确定了护理模式,重点是减少并发症、培训人力资源和支持心理社会发展。在巴西,由多学科团队在二级医疗机构提供护理。在古巴,由三级儿童糖尿病诊所提供护理。两种模式都强调对患者及其家庭的糖尿病教育、定期专科会诊以及社区宣传倡议。独特之处包括古巴的假日营和巴西针对医疗保健专业人员的实习项目。巴西的糖尿病护理是免费的,为有需要的人提供额外资源。东南亚区域 我们在孟加拉国、印度、缅甸、斯里兰卡和泰国确定了护理模式,实施时间为2009年至2015年。这些模式旨在改善护理可及性、自我管理教育以及医护人员和社区的意识,特别是针对贫困线以下儿童。在CDiC、LFAC和“糖尿病行动4”(A4D)等倡议的支持下,这些模式通过多学科团队提供门诊护理,大多数国家提供免费胰岛素和用品。定期糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)监测、糖尿病教育和心理支持是关键组成部分,四个国家还开展了社区宣传倡议。财政障碍仍然很大,特别是在孟加拉国和泰国。欧洲区域 我们在哈萨克斯坦和土耳其确定了护理模式,旨在提供全面的糖尿病护理并改善患者福祉。在哈萨克斯坦,护理包括免费胰岛素、血糖仪和试纸,并建立了低血糖和糖尿病酮症酸中毒监测系统。土耳其自1994年起启动的国家儿童糖尿病项目通过多学科医疗团队提供护理,并包括“学校糖尿病项目”等提高意识的倡议。两国在某些用品和技术方面仍然存在财政障碍。东地中海区域 我们在摩洛哥确定了一种护理模式,该模式于1986年实施,已从单一的三级医疗机构扩展到九家省级二级医院,覆盖该国三分之一的T1DM年轻患者。护理由多学科团队提供,包括初始住院治疗,随后每三个月进行一次门诊会诊。强调自我管理教育,包括小组课程、假日营以及为文盲父母提供的量身定制资源。一个数据库系统支持电子数据监测。通过赞助商和协会为低收入家庭提供财政支持,尽管保险覆盖范围仅限于胰岛素费用。西太平洋区域 我们在柬埔寨、马来西亚、越南和老挝确定了护理模式,这些模式由A4D项目提供支持。T1DM护理包括免费胰岛素、血糖仪、HbA1c检测和应急资金,护理通过三级和二级医疗机构提供,但越南除外,该国由单一的三级诊所提供护理。柬埔寨、马来西亚和越南有多学科团队,但老挝没有。糖尿病并发症筛查各不相同,柬埔寨和老挝提供的筛查最为全面。对医护人员的持续糖尿病培训以及电子患者数据库是护理模式的组成部分。老挝仍然存在财政障碍,某些筛查评估需要自掏腰包支付费用。
在本综述纳入的许多国家,T1DM护理取得了显著改善,特别是通过国际伙伴关系。然而,护理的可持续性、一致性和全面性仍然是进一步提高T1DM儿童和青少年预期寿命和生活质量的持续挑战。
世界卫生组织(WHO)
通过doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JZ65G在开放科学框架(OSF)注册