Sarangi Sudhir Chandra, Pattnaik Soumya Sucharita, Singh Ratnav, Dash Yajnaseni, Tripathi Manjari, Singh Surender, Khan Maroof Ahmad
Dept. of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Dept. of Pharmacology, Central Armed Police Forces Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 Sep 10. doi: 10.1007/s00210-025-04561-6.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of add-on metformin treatment in persons with active epilepsy (a-PWE). This is a single-centric, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomised a-PWE (1:1) to receive either metformin (extended-release 500 mg) or matching placebo for 6 months along with background antiseizure medications. Primary outcome was percentage change in seizure frequency/month, and secondary outcomes were 50% responder rate, serum mTOR expression, and serum total antioxidant capacity (TAC), body composition analysis, quality of life (QOL), and safety assessment. Among the randomised a-PWE (n = 60, 30 in each group), no significant difference in percentage change in seizure frequency/month [median (IQR), 5.00 (- 11.25 to 23.45) vs. 0 (- 15.00 to 25.00), median difference (95% CI), 0 (- 18.75 to 12.50), p = 0.687], mTOR expression, TAC, and QOL was noted between metformin and placebo. Compared to baseline, QOL was significantly improved (p = 0.019) in metformin group, but this was not evident in placebo. Body composition analysis revealed a significant increase in percentage-change in BMI (p < 0.001), fat % (p = 0.011), and fat mass (p = 0.004) in placebo compared to metformin. No significant safety concern was observed in metformin group, rather Liverpool adverse event profile (LAEP) score was significantly lower than placebo (p = 0.014). Significant improvement in lipid profile (triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein) and glycaemic parameters was observed in metformin group compared to baseline. Metformin intervention at the selected dose was not effective in terms of seizure reduction or modulation of mTOR expression compared to placebo. Further studies with higher dose with longer duration of intervention may be needed to establish the findings. Trial registration no. CTRI/2023/10/058825, date: 18.10.2023.
本研究的目的是调查加用二甲双胍治疗活动性癫痫患者(a-PWE)的疗效和安全性。这是一项单中心、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,将a-PWE按1:1随机分组,分别接受二甲双胍(缓释片500mg)或匹配的安慰剂,为期6个月,同时服用背景抗癫痫药物。主要结局是每月癫痫发作频率的百分比变化,次要结局是50%缓解率、血清mTOR表达、血清总抗氧化能力(TAC)、身体成分分析、生活质量(QOL)和安全性评估。在随机分组的a-PWE中(n = 60,每组30例),二甲双胍组和安慰剂组在每月癫痫发作频率的百分比变化[中位数(IQR),5.00(-11.25至23.45) vs. 0(-15.00至25.00),中位数差异(95%CI),0(-18.75至12.50),p = 0.687]、mTOR表达、TAC和QOL方面未观察到显著差异。与基线相比,二甲双胍组的QOL显著改善(p = 0.019),但安慰剂组未观察到明显改善。身体成分分析显示,与二甲双胍组相比,安慰剂组的BMI百分比变化(p < 0.001)、脂肪百分比(p = 0.011)和脂肪量(p = 0.004)显著增加。二甲双胍组未观察到明显的安全问题,相反,利物浦不良事件概况(LAEP)评分显著低于安慰剂组(p = 0.014)。与基线相比,二甲双胍组的血脂谱(甘油三酯和高密度脂蛋白)和血糖参数有显著改善。与安慰剂相比,所选剂量的二甲双胍干预在减少癫痫发作或调节mTOR表达方面无效。可能需要进一步开展更高剂量、更长干预时间的研究来证实这些结果。试验注册号:CTRI/2023/10/058825,日期:2023年10月18日。