Pasquini Pietro, Pazzaglia Enrico, Brucchi Francesco, Jamaer Emily, De Angelis Mario, Mottrie Alexandre
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Division of Oncologic Gynecology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, Via Massarenti 13, Bologna, Italy.
J Robot Surg. 2025 Sep 10;19(1):587. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02751-1.
This Letter to the Editor responds to the recent publication by Patel et al. (J Robot Surg. Jul 11;19(1):370, 2025), which outlines a framework and recommendations for telesurgery. Their work identifies the most suitable network connections and the need for redundancy systems to reduce network failures, while also prompting further reflections on additional implications. In particular, it led us to consider the exclusive challenges of telesurgery, which we identified primarily in a new category of complications related to network connectivity, alongside the well-established clinical and technical complications of traditional and robotic surgery. This correspondence further emphasizes the ongoing transformation of surgery from a direct interaction between surgeon and patient to a coordinated team-based practice involving assistants, machines, and technical specialists. By addressing these emerging challenges, this commentary highlights the necessity of re-evaluating safety assumptions in telesurgical practice.
这封致编辑的信是对帕特尔等人最近发表的文章(《机器人手术杂志》。2025年7月11日;19(1):370)的回应,该文章概述了远程手术的框架和建议。他们的工作确定了最合适的网络连接以及冗余系统以减少网络故障的必要性,同时也引发了对其他影响的进一步思考。特别是,它促使我们考虑远程手术的独特挑战,我们主要在与网络连接相关的一类新并发症中识别出这些挑战,同时还有传统手术和机器人手术中已有的临床和技术并发症。这篇通信进一步强调了手术正在从外科医生与患者之间的直接互动转变为涉及助手、机器和技术专家的基于团队的协作实践。通过应对这些新出现的挑战,这篇评论强调了重新评估远程手术实践中安全假设的必要性。