Samson David R, Oesch Nathan, Woodard Colin
University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Nationhood Lab, Pell Center for International Relations and Public Policy, Salve Regina University, Newport, Rhode Island, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 10;20(9):e0327972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327972. eCollection 2025.
This study investigates the "First Settler Wellness Effect," exploring how cultural geography impacts traditional wellness (physical health, social relationships, and financial stability) and existential wellness (purpose, meaning, and community identity) across the United States. Using data from the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index, which includes responses from over 325,000 individuals across 110 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) from 2009 to 2016, we analyze wellness outcomes through the lens of the American Nations Model. This model categorizes the United States into distinct cultural regions shaped by early settlement patterns, emphasizing the enduring influence of regional norms and ideologies. Our findings, in support of the American Nations Model, reveal significant regional variation in wellness outcomes. Northeastern and Midwestern regions, characterized by communal norms, high educational attainment, and institutional trust, exhibit elevated traditional wellness scores (e.g., β = 0.371, p = 0.002). These regions reflect a stability rooted in health infrastructure and economic security. In contrast, Southern regions, shaped by honor-based values emphasizing personal autonomy, loyalty, and social reputation, show significantly higher existential wellness (e.g., β = 0.590, p = 0.011). This divergence highlights a tradeoff between material stability and existential fulfillment shaped by cultural norms. Interestingly, Southern regions demonstrate elevated existential wellness for Black and Hispanic residents compared to other regions, suggesting localized cultural or community support may offset systemic disparities. Conversely, Northeastern and Midwestern regions report higher traditional wellness yet fail to foster similar levels of existential fulfillment, underscoring the limitations of material prosperity alone. These findings emphasize the interplay between cultural history, regional identity, and human flourishing, offering insights for targeted public health and policy interventions.
本研究调查了“首批定居者健康效应”,探讨文化地理学如何影响美国各地的传统健康(身体健康、社会关系和经济稳定)和生存健康(目标、意义和社区认同)。我们使用盖洛普-健康之路幸福指数的数据,该数据包括2009年至2016年来自110个大都市统计区(MSA)的325,000多人的回复,通过美国国家模型的视角分析健康结果。该模型将美国分为由早期定居模式形成的不同文化区域,强调区域规范和意识形态的持久影响。我们支持美国国家模型的研究结果显示,健康结果存在显著的区域差异。以社区规范、高教育程度和机构信任为特征的东北部和中西部地区,传统健康得分较高(例如,β = 0.371,p = 0.002)。这些地区反映了基于健康基础设施和经济安全的稳定性。相比之下,受强调个人自主、忠诚和社会声誉的荣誉价值观影响的南部地区,生存健康显著更高(例如,β = 0.590,p = 0.011)。这种差异凸显了文化规范所塑造的物质稳定与生存满足之间的权衡。有趣的是,与其他地区相比,南部地区的黑人和西班牙裔居民的生存健康水平更高,这表明当地的文化或社区支持可能抵消系统性差异。相反,东北部和中西部地区报告的传统健康水平较高,但未能培养出类似水平的生存满足感,这凸显了仅靠物质繁荣的局限性。这些发现强调了文化历史、区域认同和人类繁荣之间的相互作用,为有针对性的公共卫生和政策干预提供了见解。