Lex Johnathan R, Abbas Aazad, Mosseri Jacob, Singh Toor Jay, Simone Michael, Ravi Bheeshma, Whyne Cari, Khalil Elias B
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Lab, Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Suite S620, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Sep 10;13:e70857. doi: 10.2196/70857.
Total knee and hip arthroplasty (TKA and THA) are among the most performed elective procedures. Rising demand and the resource-intensive nature of these procedures have contributed to longer wait times despite significant health care investment. Current scheduling methods often rely on average surgical durations, overlooking patient-specific variability.
To determine the potential for improving elective surgery scheduling for TKA and THA, respectively, by using a 2-stage approach that incorporates machine learning (ML) prediction of the duration of surgery (DOS) with scheduling optimization.
In total, 2 ML models (one each for TKA and THA) were trained to predict DOS using patient factors based on 302,490 and 196,942 patients, respectively, from a large international database. In total, 3 optimization formulations based on varying surgeon flexibility were compared: Any (surgeons could operate in any operating room at any time), Split (limitation of 2 surgeons per operating room per day), and multiple subset sum problem (MSSP; limit of 1 surgeon per operating room per day). Two years of daily scheduling simulations were performed for each optimization problem using ML prediction or mean DOS over a range of schedule parameters. Constraints and resources were based on a high-volume arthroplasty hospital in Canada.
The TKA and THA prediction models achieved test accuracy (with a 30 min buffer) of 78.1% (mean squared error 0.898) and 75.4% (mean squared error 0.916), respectively. Any scheduling formulation performed significantly worse than the Split and MSSP formulations with respect to overtime and underutilization (P<.001). The latter 2 problems performed similarly (P>.05) over most schedule parameters. The ML prediction schedules outperformed those generated using a mean DOS for most scheduling parameters, with overtime reduced on average by 300-500 minutes per week (12-20 min per operating room per day; P<.001). However, there was more operating room underutilization with the ML prediction schedules, with it ranging from 70-192 minutes more underutilization (P<.001). Using a 15-minute schedule granularity with a waitlist pool of a minimum of 1 month generated the ML schedule that outperformed the mean schedule 97.1% of times.
Assuming a full waiting list, optimizing an individual surgeon's elective operating room time using an ML-assisted predict-then-optimize scheduling system improves overall operating room efficiency, significantly decreasing overtime. This has significant potential implications for health care systems struggling with pressures of rising costs and growing operative waitlists.
全膝关节置换术(TKA)和全髋关节置换术(THA)是最常开展的择期手术。尽管医疗保健投入巨大,但这些手术需求的增加以及资源密集型的特点导致等待时间延长。当前的排班方法通常依赖平均手术时长,忽略了患者的个体差异。
分别通过采用两阶段方法来确定改善TKA和THA择期手术排班的潜力,该方法将手术时长(DOS)的机器学习(ML)预测与排班优化相结合。
总共训练了2个ML模型(TKA和THA各一个),分别基于来自一个大型国际数据库的302490例和196942例患者的患者因素来预测DOS。总共比较了基于不同外科医生灵活性的3种优化公式:任意安排(外科医生可在任何时间在任何手术室进行手术)、拆分安排(每个手术室每天限制2名外科医生)和多重子集和问题(MSSP;每个手术室每天限制1名外科医生)。针对每个优化问题,使用ML预测或一系列排班参数下的平均DOS进行了为期两年的每日排班模拟。约束条件和资源基于加拿大一家高容量关节置换医院。
TKA和THA预测模型分别实现了78.1%(均方误差0.898)和75.4%(均方误差0.916)的测试准确率(有30分钟缓冲时间)。在加班和未充分利用方面,任意排班公式的表现明显不如拆分安排和MSSP公式(P<0.001)。后两种问题在大多数排班参数下表现相似(P>0.05)。对于大多数排班参数,ML预测排班的表现优于使用平均DOS生成的排班,加班时间平均每周减少300 - 500分钟(每个手术室每天减少12 - 20分钟;P<0.001)。然而,ML预测排班导致手术室未充分利用的情况更多,未充分利用时间多出70 - 192分钟(P<0.001)。使用15分钟的排班粒度和至少1个月的等待名单池生成的ML排班在97.1%的情况下表现优于平均排班。
假设等待名单已满,使用ML辅助的先预测后优化排班系统来优化个体外科医生的择期手术室时间可提高整体手术室效率,显著减少加班时间。这对于面临成本上升压力和手术等待名单不断增加的医疗保健系统具有重大潜在影响。