• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低梯度和极低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后的临床结局

Clinical outcomes following TAVR for patients with low and very low gradient aortic stenosis.

作者信息

Besir Besir, Lomaia Tamari, Ramu Shivabalan Kathavarayan, Rajendran Judah, Reed Grant W, Puri Rishi, Harb Serge C, Popovic Zoran, Krishnaswamy Amar, Kapadia Samir R

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2025.09.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.pcad.2025.09.005
PMID:40930206
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study explores the impact of lower baseline aortic valve (AV) mean gradients on the clinical outcomes of patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis (LG AS) post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Additionally, the study aims to understand the predictors of a lower baseline AV mean gradient (MG).

BACKGROUND

Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and low-flow states are known to correlate with worse clinical outcomes. Lower mean gradients are also known to correlate with poorer outcomes, but the outcomes of patients with very low-gradient AS compared to low-gradient AS are not well understood.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort of patients >18 years who underwent TAVR at Cleveland Clinic between 2016 and 2020. Only patients with AV area < 1 cm, and AV MG <40 mmHg were included. Patients who underwent valve-in-valve TAVR were excluded. Patients were classified into 3 tertiles according to their baseline AV MG. Clinical outcomes included mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Survival analysis was used to assess the clinical outcomes between the tertiles.

RESULTS

Around 60 % of the patients in this study were males, with a mean age of 80 years. The mean AV MG was 21.8 ± 4.0 mmHg for the first tertile, 30.9 ± 1.9 mmHg for the second tertile, and 37.1 ± 1.6 mmHg for the third tertile. The present study shows that patients with very low-gradient AS (first tertile) have higher mortality rates compared to those with low-gradient AS (third tertile) (hazard ratio: 2.07, 95 % confidence interval (1.2-3.6)), even after stratifying by flow and by LVEF. Lower stroke volume index (SVI), lower LVEF, atrial fibrillation, and moderate to severe TR were associated with lower mean gradients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with very low-gradient AS have worse outcomes than those with low-gradient AS. Multiple clinical characteristics, including a lower SVI, lower LVEF, and atrial fibrillation, correlate with having very low-gradient AS. Therefore patients with low-gradient AS should undergo earlier intervention to improve their clinical outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨较低的基线主动脉瓣(AV)平均压差对经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后低压差主动脉瓣狭窄(LG AS)患者临床结局的影响。此外,该研究旨在了解较低基线AV平均压差(MG)的预测因素。

背景

已知左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低和低流量状态与更差的临床结局相关。较低的平均压差也与较差的结局相关,但极低压差AS患者与低压差AS患者的结局尚未得到充分了解。

方法

这是一项对2016年至2020年间在克利夫兰诊所接受TAVR的18岁以上患者的回顾性队列研究。仅纳入AV面积<1 cm且AV MG<40 mmHg的患者。接受瓣中瓣TAVR的患者被排除。根据患者的基线AV MG将其分为三个三分位数。临床结局包括死亡率和心力衰竭住院率。采用生存分析评估三分位数之间的临床结局。

结果

本研究中约60%的患者为男性,平均年龄为80岁。第一个三分位数的平均AV MG为21.8±4.0 mmHg,第二个三分位数为30.9±1.9 mmHg,第三个三分位数为37.1±1.6 mmHg。本研究表明,即使在按流量和LVEF分层后,极低压差AS患者(第一个三分位数)的死亡率仍高于低压差AS患者(第三个三分位数)(风险比:2.07,95%置信区间[1.2 - 3.6])。较低的每搏输出量指数(SVI)、较低的LVEF、心房颤动以及中度至重度三尖瓣反流(TR)与较低的平均压差相关。

结论

极低压差AS患者的结局比低压差AS患者更差。包括较低的SVI、较低的LVEF和心房颤动在内的多种临床特征与极低压差AS相关。因此,低压差AS患者应尽早接受干预以改善其临床结局。

相似文献

1
Clinical outcomes following TAVR for patients with low and very low gradient aortic stenosis.低梯度和极低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后的临床结局
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2025.09.005.
2
Comparative Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Conservative Management in Patients with Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.低流量、低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与保守治疗的比较结果
Am J Cardiol. 2025 May 28;252:30-39. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.05.018.
3
Outcomes of Patients With a Small and Large Aortic Annulus Following Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Across Flow-Gradient Patterns.经导管球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗不同跨瓣压差模式下主动脉瓣环大小各异患者的结局
Struct Heart. 2025 Mar 21;9(8):100456. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2025.100456. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
7
Integration of Flow-Gradient Patterns Into Clinical Decision Making for Patients With Suspected Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved LVEF: A Systematic Review of Evidence and Meta-Analysis.血流储备分数与梯度在左心室射血分数保留的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者临床决策中的整合:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Nov;9(11):1255-1263. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.01.035. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
8
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
9
Meta-analysis of longitudinal comparison of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low to intermediate surgical risk.低至中度手术风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术纵向比较的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):8097-8106. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002158.
10
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.