• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利宫颈癌筛查指南。关于在基于风险的人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)筛查中使用生物标志物的多学会建议及分级推荐评估、制定和评价(GRADE)方法

Italian guidelines for cervical cancer screening. Multisocietal recommendations on the use of biomarkers in HPV screening with risk-based approach and GRADE methodology.

作者信息

Gori Silvia, Venturelli Francesco, Carozzi Francesca, Giorgi Rossi Paolo, Del Mistro Annarosa

机构信息

Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy.

Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2025 Sep 11. doi: 10.1038/s41416-025-03161-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41416-025-03161-8
PMID:40931128
Abstract

The European Council recommends adopting risk-based screening when relevant. In triaging HPV-positive women, it can be an effective strategy to reduce overtreatment and referral to colposcopy. HPV genotyping and p16/ki67 expression may allow a better risk stratification than cytology. In Italy, recommendations on their use (alone or combined) in screening were developed by a multi-professional (nine scientific societies) and multidisciplinary working group (including patients and decision makers). Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence to Decision frameworks were used. Data from large clinical trials on screening populations with long follow-up instructed the biomarkers' evaluation. The working group defined the CIN3+ risk thresholds (a surrogate marker of cancer risk) to guide decisions on management: immediate colposcopy, referral to 1-year and 3-year retesting. The risk-based approach allowed to reduce the number of possible strategies to be compared to five specific healthcare questions framed as PICOs. The prioritised outcomes were risk of cancer and of CIN3+ in HPV+/triage-negative women, number of colposcopies, number of samples to be taken, and number of unneeded treatments. The combination of morphological markers (cytology or p16/ki67) and extended HPV genotyping was the only strategy with a conditional recommendation in favour when compared with cytology.

摘要

欧洲理事会建议在相关情况下采用基于风险的筛查。在对人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)阳性女性进行分流时,这可能是减少过度治疗和转诊至阴道镜检查的有效策略。与细胞学检查相比,HPV基因分型和p16/ki67表达可能有助于更好地进行风险分层。在意大利,一个多专业(九个科学学会)和多学科的工作组(包括患者和决策者)制定了关于在筛查中单独或联合使用它们的建议。使用了推荐评估、制定和评价分级(GRADE)证据到决策框架。来自对筛查人群进行长期随访的大型临床试验的数据指导了生物标志物的评估。该工作组定义了CIN3+风险阈值(癌症风险的替代标志物),以指导管理决策:立即进行阴道镜检查、转诊至1年和3年复查。基于风险的方法允许将可能的策略数量减少到与五个以PICOs形式提出的特定医疗保健问题进行比较。优先考虑的结果是HPV阳性/分流阴性女性患癌症和CIN3+的风险、阴道镜检查的次数、采集的样本数量以及不必要治疗的次数。与细胞学检查相比,形态学标志物(细胞学或p16/ki67)和扩展HPV基因分型的组合是唯一一项有条件推荐支持的策略。

相似文献

1
Italian guidelines for cervical cancer screening. Multisocietal recommendations on the use of biomarkers in HPV screening with risk-based approach and GRADE methodology.意大利宫颈癌筛查指南。关于在基于风险的人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)筛查中使用生物标志物的多学会建议及分级推荐评估、制定和评价(GRADE)方法
Br J Cancer. 2025 Sep 11. doi: 10.1038/s41416-025-03161-8.
2
[Health technology assessment report. Use of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer precursors screening].[卫生技术评估报告。液基细胞学在宫颈癌前病变筛查中的应用]
Epidemiol Prev. 2012 Sep-Oct;36(5 Suppl 2):e1-e33.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Immediate referral to colposcopy versus cytological surveillance for minor cervical cytological abnormalities in the absence of HPV test.在未进行人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测的情况下,对于轻度宫颈细胞学异常,立即转诊至阴道镜检查与细胞学监测的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 26;1(1):CD009836. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009836.pub2.
5
Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions.人乳头瘤病毒检测与重复细胞学检查用于轻度宫颈细胞学病变的分流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD008054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008054.pub2.
6
Should we use risk selection tests for HPV 16 and/or 18 positive cases: Comparison of p16/Ki67 and cytology.是否应针对 HPV 16 和/或 18 阳性病例使用风险选择检测:p16/Ki67 和细胞学的比较。
J Med Virol. 2024 Mar;96(3):e29500. doi: 10.1002/jmv.29500.
7
[Guidelines for the prevention and management of bronchial asthma (2024 edition)].[支气管哮喘防治指南(2024年版)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2025 Mar 12;48(3):208-248. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20241013-00601.
8
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
10
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of HPV-positive triage strategies combining extended genotyping with cytology or p16/ki67 dual staining in the Italian NTCC2 study.意大利 NTCC2 研究中 HPV 阳性分流策略的比较:联合扩展基因分型与细胞学或 p16/ki67 双重染色。
EBioMedicine. 2024 Jun;104:105149. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105149. Epub 2024 May 17.
2
Molecular triaging options for women testing HPV positive with self-collected samples.对使用自我采集样本检测出人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)呈阳性的女性进行分子分类的选择方案。
Front Oncol. 2023 Sep 22;13:1243888. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1243888. eCollection 2023.
3
Performance of HPV E6/E7 mRNA assay as primary screening test: Results from the NTCC2 trial.
HPV E6/E7 mRNA 检测作为初筛试验的表现:来自 NTCC2 试验的结果。
Int J Cancer. 2022 Oct 1;151(7):1047-1058. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34120. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
4
The IARC Perspective on Cervical Cancer Screening.国际癌症研究机构对宫颈癌筛查的观点。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 11;385(20):1908-1918. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr2030640.
5
Accuracy of different triage strategies for human papillomavirus positivity in an Italian screening population.意大利筛查人群中不同分诊策略对人乳头瘤病毒阳性的准确性。
Int J Cancer. 2022 Mar 15;150(6):952-960. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33858. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
6
p16/ki67 and E6/E7 mRNA Accuracy and Prognostic Value in Triaging HPV DNA-Positive Women.p16/ki67 和 E6/E7mRNA 在 HPV DNA 阳性女性分流中的准确性和预后价值。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Mar 1;113(3):292-300. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa105.
7
Combined use of cytology, p16 immunostaining and genotyping for triage of women positive for high-risk human papillomavirus at primary screening.细胞学检查、p16 免疫组化染色和基因分型联合用于高危型人乳头瘤病毒初筛阳性妇女的分流。
Int J Cancer. 2020 Oct 1;147(7):1864-1873. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32973. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
8
HPV screening performance indicators in women who previously tested HPV-negative: The second round of Vallecamonica screening programme, Northern Italy.HPV 阴性妇女 HPV 筛查的性能指标:意大利北部 Vallecamonica 第二轮筛查项目。
J Med Screen. 2020 Dec;27(4):207-214. doi: 10.1177/0969141320905325. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
9
HPV-based cervical screening: Rationale, expectations and future perspectives of the new Dutch screening programme.HPV 为基础的子宫颈筛查:新荷兰筛检计画的原理、期待与未来展望。
Prev Med. 2019 Feb;119:108-117. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.12.021. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
10
Five-Year Risk of Cervical Precancer Following p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stain Triage of HPV-Positive Women.HPV 阳性女性 p16/Ki-67 双染分流后 5 年的宫颈癌前病变风险。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;5(2):181-186. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4270.