Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Regional Cancer Prevention Laboratory, Oncological Network, Prevention and Research Institute (ISPRO), Florence, Italy.
Int J Cancer. 2020 Oct 1;147(7):1864-1873. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32973. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is very sensitive for primary cervical screening but has low specificity. Triage tests that improve specificity but maintain high sensitivity are needed. Women enrolled in the experimental arm of Phase 2 of the New Technologies for Cervical Cancer randomized controlled cervical screening trial were tested for high-risk HPV (hrHPV) and referred to colposcopy if positive. hrHPV-positive women also had HPV genotyping (by polymerase chain reaction with GP5+/GP6+ primers and reverse line blotting), immunostaining for p16 overexpression and cytology. We computed sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) for different combinations of tests and determined potential hierarchical ordering of triage tests. A number of 1,091 HPV-positive women had valid tests for cytology, p16 and genotyping. Ninety-two of them had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ (CIN2+) histology and 40 of them had CIN grade 3+ (CIN3+) histology. The PPV for CIN2+ was >10% in hrHPV-positive women with positive high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (61.3%), positive low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL+) (18.3%) and positive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (14.8%) cytology, p16 positive (16.7%) and, hierarchically, for infections by HPV33, 16, 35, 59, 31 and 52 (in decreasing order). Referral of women positive for either p16 or LSIL+ cytology had 97.8% sensitivity for CIN2+ and women negative for both of these had a 3-year CIN3+ risk of 0.2%. Similar results were seen for women being either p16 or HPV16/33 positive. hrHPV-positive women who were negative for p16 and cytology (LSIL threshold) had a very low CIN3+ rate in the following 3 years. Recalling them after that interval and referring those positive for either test to immediate colposcopy seem to be an efficient triage strategy. The same applies to p16 and HPV16.
人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测在原发性宫颈癌筛查中非常敏感,但特异性较低。需要改进特异性但保持高敏感性的分流试验。在宫颈癌新技术随机对照筛查试验第二阶段的实验臂中招募的女性接受高危型 HPV(hrHPV)检测,如果检测结果阳性,则转诊行阴道镜检查。hrHPV 阳性女性还接受 HPV 基因分型(聚合酶链反应加 GP5+/GP6+引物和反向线印迹)、p16 过表达免疫染色和细胞学检查。我们计算了不同组合检测的敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值(PPV),并确定了分流检测的潜在分层顺序。1091 名 HPV 阳性女性的细胞学、p16 和基因分型检测结果有效。其中 92 名患有宫颈上皮内瘤变 2 级(CIN2+)组织学病变,40 名患有 CIN 3 级(CIN3+)组织学病变。在 hrHPV 阳性的女性中,细胞学检测阳性高级别鳞状上皮内病变(61.3%)、细胞学检测阳性低级别鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL+)(18.3%)和细胞学检测阳性意义不明的非典型鳞状细胞(14.8%)、p16 阳性(16.7%)和 HPV33、16、35、59、31 和 52 感染阳性(按降序排列)的女性中,CIN2+的 PPV >10%。细胞学检测 p16 或 LSIL+阳性的女性转诊后,CIN2+的敏感性为 97.8%,细胞学检测 p16 和 LSIL+均阴性的女性,3 年内发生 CIN3+的风险为 0.2%。对于细胞学检测 p16 或 HPV16/33 阳性的女性,结果相似。细胞学检测 p16 和 LSIL 阴性(LSIL 阈值)的 hrHPV 阳性女性在随后的 3 年内发生 CIN3+的概率非常低。在此间隔后召回这些女性,并对任何一种检测结果阳性的女性进行即时阴道镜检查,似乎是一种有效的分流策略。p16 和 HPV16 也同样适用。