Kaitz M, Monitz J, Nesher R
Int J Neurosci. 1985 Dec;28(3-4):261-8. doi: 10.3109/00207458508985393.
The phenomenon of paracontrast documented by means of psychophysical techniques has not been readily demonstrable using electrophysiological responses as an index of masking. We have analyzed averaged cortical potentials during presentation of visual stimuli that produce psychophysical masking. Differences in the masking profiles obtained from the two experimental conditions are apparent. However, both electrophysiological and psychophysical data do indicate an interaction between responses to an annulus and a disc which varies with the time interval between the stimuli. Both sets of data also reflect differences in masking between right and left eyes. We conclude that the cortical potentials evoked by temporally disparate stimuli do interact, but that the masking profile is not identical to the profile obtained by psychophysical methods.
通过心理物理学技术记录的副对比现象,若用电生理反应作为掩蔽指标则难以轻易证实。我们分析了在呈现产生心理物理学掩蔽的视觉刺激期间的平均皮层电位。从两种实验条件获得的掩蔽曲线存在明显差异。然而,电生理和心理物理学数据均表明,对环形和圆盘的反应之间存在相互作用,且这种相互作用随刺激之间的时间间隔而变化。两组数据还反映了左右眼之间掩蔽的差异。我们得出结论,由时间上不同的刺激诱发的皮层电位确实会相互作用,但掩蔽曲线与通过心理物理学方法获得的曲线并不相同。