McArthur Jenn, Dunne Stephen, Ivory Sarah Birrell
University of Edinburgh, UK.
Organization (Lond). 2024 Apr 16;32(6):816-840. doi: 10.1177/13505084241241489. eCollection 2025 Sep.
Organizational scholarship on architecture often applies Henri Lefebvre's , and framework. Karen Dale and Gibson Burrell, most notably, have illustrated how architectural design exploits each of these, exerting managerial control through processes of , and . Although this "3E framework" has been productively applied to buildings from the modern and postmodern periods, its weaknesses become apparent in the current occupant-centric design period. Drawing on Actor Network Theory's account of , we propose -a 4th "E"-which enables us to better capture the nature of spatial control in the occupant-centric design period. Our recognizes the tensions that Lefebvre originally observed, tensions concealed by Dale and Burrell's otherwise rightly influential work. This expanded framework also augments our understanding of modern and postmodern periods: the dominant Building Movements of the past Century, we claim, have each engaged in a recursive of socio-political ideals.
关于建筑的组织学术研究常常运用亨利·列斐伏尔的[此处原文缺失具体内容]以及[此处原文缺失具体内容]框架。最为显著的是,凯伦·戴尔和吉布森·伯勒尔阐释了建筑设计如何利用这些要素中的每一个,通过[此处原文缺失具体内容]、[此处原文缺失具体内容]以及[此处原文缺失具体内容]的过程来实施管理控制。尽管这个“3E框架”已有效地应用于现代和后现代时期的建筑,但在当前以居住者为中心的设计时期,其弱点变得明显。借鉴行动者网络理论对[此处原文缺失具体内容]的描述,我们提出第四个“E”,这使我们能够更好地把握以居住者为中心的设计时期空间控制的本质。我们的[此处原文缺失具体内容]认识到列斐伏尔最初观察到的紧张关系,这些紧张关系被戴尔和伯勒尔原本颇具影响力的著作所掩盖。这个扩展后的框架还增强了我们对现代和后现代时期的理解:我们认为,过去一个世纪占主导地位的建筑运动都参与了社会政治理想的递归[此处原文缺失具体内容]。