Sun Yanxia, Yang Lihua, Zhu Lihong, Zhang Shu, Cheng Wei, Lin Lei, Li Wei, Li Min, Zhao Xueli, Guo Jing, Hua Zhen
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Clinic, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
J Pain Res. 2025 Sep 5;18:4623-4633. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S537971. eCollection 2025.
Primary dysmenorrhea carries substantial medical, social, and economic burdens, leading many patients to seek low-risk complementary and alternative therapies, such as acupuncture. Myofascial trigger point dry needling (MTrP-DN) has recently gained attention as a potential treatment, though evidence remains limited and its distinction from acupuncture is debated. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of MTrP-DN for primary dysmenorrhea, using traditional acupuncture as an active control and sham needling as a passive control.
This is a randomized, subject-blind, sham-controlled trial. A total of 150 subjects with primary dysmenorrhea will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to the MTrP-DN, acupuncture, or sham group, receiving consecutive 3-week treatments with follow-up for 12 months. The primary outcome is pain intensity, measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include quality of life, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) usage, self-reported improvement using the Global Rate of Change (GROC) scale, serum inflammatory markers, and uterine blood flow assessed by Doppler. Outcomes will be evaluated at baseline, 1 month, 2 months, and 12months post-treatment during menstruation. Multivariate analysis of variance will be used to analyze the interactions between different groups, different time periods, and the interaction of group and time.
This study is the first to compare the efficacy of MTrP-DN with acupuncture in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea, focusing on their effects on pain intensity, uterine blood flow, and inflammatory markers. Including a sham control group helps address blinding issues and accurately assess MTrP-DN's effects on pain and quality of life.
Clinicaltrial.gov (NCT06316583).
原发性痛经带来了巨大的医学、社会和经济负担,导致许多患者寻求低风险的补充和替代疗法,如针灸。肌筋膜触发点干针疗法(MTrP-DN)作为一种潜在的治疗方法最近受到关注,尽管证据仍然有限,且其与针灸的区别存在争议。因此,本研究旨在以传统针灸作为阳性对照、假针刺作为阴性对照,评估MTrP-DN治疗原发性痛经的疗效。
这是一项随机、受试者盲法、假针对照试验。总共150名原发性痛经患者将按1:1:1的比例随机分配到MTrP-DN组、针灸组或假针组,接受连续3周的治疗,并随访12个月。主要结局是疼痛强度,采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行测量。次要结局包括生活质量、非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)的使用情况、使用总体变化率(GROC)量表自我报告的改善情况、血清炎症标志物以及通过多普勒评估的子宫血流。将在月经期间治疗后的基线、1个月、2个月和12个月评估结局。将使用多变量方差分析来分析不同组、不同时间段之间的相互作用以及组与时间的相互作用。
本研究首次比较了MTrP-DN与针灸治疗原发性痛经的疗效,重点关注它们对疼痛强度、子宫血流和炎症标志物的影响。纳入假针对照组有助于解决盲法问题,并准确评估MTrP-DN对疼痛和生活质量的影响。
Clinicaltrial.gov(NCT06316583)。