Department of Radiology, Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Rehabilitación San Fernando, Madrid, Spain.
Clin Rehabil. 2020 Nov;34(11):1327-1340. doi: 10.1177/0269215520937468. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
This meta-analysis evaluated the effect of dry needling alone or combined with other treatment interventions on pain, related-disability, pressure pain sensitivity, and strength in people with lateral epicondylalgia of musculoskeletal origin.
MEDLINE, CINAHL, PubMed, PEDro, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases from their inception to 5 April 2020.
Randomized controlled trials collecting outcomes on pain, related-disability, pressure pain thresholds, or strength where one group received dry needling for lateral epicondylalgia of musculoskeletal origin. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane Guidelines, methodological quality was assessed with the PEDro score, and the quality of evidence by using the GRADE approach.
Seven studies including 320 patients with lateral epicondylalgia were included. The meta-analysis found that dry needling reduced pain intensity (SMD ‒1.13, 95%CI ‒1.64 to ‒0.62) and related-disability (SMD ‒2.17, 95%CI ‒3.34 to ‒1.01) with large effect sizes compared to a comparative group. Dry needling also increased pressure pain thresholds with a large effect size (SMD 0.98, 95%CI 0.30 to 1.67) and grip strength with a small size effect (SMD 0.48, 95%CI 0.16 to 0.81) when compared to a comparative group. The most significant effect was at short-term. The risk of bias was generally low, but the heterogenicity of the results downgraded the evidence level.
Low to moderate evidence suggests a positive effect of dry needling for pain, pain-related disability, pressure pain sensitivity and strength at short-term in patients with lateral epicondylalgia of musculoskeletal origin.
Therapy, level 1a.
OSF Registry - https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ZY3E8.
本荟萃分析评估了单纯干针疗法或联合其他治疗干预措施对肌骨源性外侧肱骨上髁炎患者疼痛、相关残疾、压痛阈和力量的影响。
MEDLINE、CINAHL、PubMed、PEDro、Cochrane 图书馆、SCOPUS 和 Web of Science 数据库,从建库至 2020 年 4 月 5 日。
收集肌骨源性外侧肱骨上髁炎患者疼痛、相关残疾、压痛阈或力量结局的随机对照试验,其中一组接受干针治疗。使用 Cochrane 指南评估偏倚风险,使用 PEDro 评分评估方法学质量,使用 GRADE 方法评估证据质量。
纳入 7 项研究共 320 例外侧肱骨上髁炎患者。荟萃分析发现,与对照组相比,干针治疗可显著降低疼痛强度(SMD ‒1.13,95%CI ‒1.64 至 ‒0.62)和相关残疾(SMD ‒2.17,95%CI ‒3.34 至 ‒1.01),具有较大效应量。与对照组相比,干针治疗还可显著增加压痛阈(SMD 0.98,95%CI 0.30 至 1.67)和握力(SMD 0.48,95%CI 0.16 至 0.81),具有较小的效应量。短期疗效最显著。偏倚风险总体较低,但结果的异质性降低了证据水平。
低至中等质量证据表明,干针治疗肌骨源性外侧肱骨上髁炎患者疼痛、疼痛相关残疾、压痛阈和力量在短期有积极作用。
治疗,1a 级。
OSF 注册处 - https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ZY3E8。