Frat Jean-Pierre, Le Pape Sylvain
CHU de Poitiers, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Poitiers F-86000, France.
INSERM, CIC-1402, IS-ALIVE, Poitiers, France.
J Intensive Med. 2025 Jan 17;5(3):222-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2024.12.003. eCollection 2025 Jul.
In patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (ARF), the first-line treatment is oxygen therapy, which may include the administration of high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO), noninvasive ventilation (NIV), or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). In addition to improving oxygenation, HFNO and NIV reduce the work of breathing as compared to standard oxygen, while CPAP does not. However, tolerance to NIV and CPAP is clinically challenging, resulting in treatment interruption in 10 %-20 % of cases. Compared to standard oxygen, HFNO has been shown to reduce the risk of intubation, while the benefits of NIV or CPAP, even when delivered via a helmet, require further evaluation. Although evidence for the efficacy of HFNO in reducing mortality remains inconclusive, HFNO has emerged as the reference treatment and is recommended for patients with hypoxemic ARF given its benefit in reducing the risk of intubation.
在低氧性急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)患者中,一线治疗是氧疗,可能包括给予高流量鼻导管吸氧(HFNO)、无创通气(NIV)或持续气道正压通气(CPAP)。与标准吸氧相比,HFNO和NIV除了能改善氧合外,还能减少呼吸功,而CPAP则不能。然而,临床上对NIV和CPAP的耐受性具有挑战性,导致10%-20%的病例治疗中断。与标准吸氧相比,HFNO已被证明可降低插管风险,而NIV或CPAP的益处,即使通过头盔给予,也需要进一步评估。尽管HFNO降低死亡率的疗效证据尚无定论,但鉴于其在降低插管风险方面的益处,HFNO已成为参考治疗方法,并被推荐用于低氧性ARF患者。