• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节骨折患者关节周围神经群阻滞中不同局部麻醉药容量的研究

Different local anesthetic volumes in pericapsular nerve group block for hip fracture patients.

作者信息

Özgüner Yusuf, Altinsoy Savaş, Kültüroğlu Gökçen, Gürpinar Sevda Gökçe, Özkan Derya, Ergil Jülide, Aydin Erbil

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye.

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye.

出版信息

Turk J Med Sci. 2025 Apr 22;55(4):860-867. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.6038. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.55730/1300-0144.6038
PMID:40933974
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12419048/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is an effective method for pain management in patients with hip fractures. In our study, we compared three different local anesthetic volumes of the PENG block in patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery with spinal anesthesia for intertrochanteric femur fractures (60 patients) were divided into three groups based on the volume of local anesthetic administered: Group 1 (20 mL), Group 2 (30 mL), and Group 3 (40 mL). Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia was initiated. Postoperative tramadol consumption, rest and movement pain scores, and the duration of motor block were monitored.

RESULTS

We found that Group 2 (118 ± 35.48 mg) and Group 3 (115 ± 42.98 mg) had reduced tramadol consumption compared to Group 1 (151 ± 31.43 mg) (p < 0.05). However, Group 3 (161 ± 18.6 min) had a longer duration of motor block (time to reach a Bromage score of 0) compared to Group 1 (132.25 ± 13.71 min) and Group 2 (143.5 ± 19.54 min) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

We found that the 30 mL and 40 mL volumes in the PENG block resulted in lower tramadol consumption compared to the 20 mL volume. We believe that the 30 mL volume is the most appropriate option among the three volumes, as it provides similar analgesic efficacy to the 40 mL volume but causes less motor block.

摘要

背景/目的:关节囊周围神经组(PENG)阻滞是髋部骨折患者疼痛管理的有效方法。在我们的研究中,我们比较了接受髋部骨折手术患者中三种不同局部麻醉药用量的PENG阻滞效果。

材料与方法

接受腰麻下股骨粗隆间骨折手术的患者(60例)根据局部麻醉药用量分为三组:第1组(20 mL)、第2组(30 mL)和第3组(40 mL)。术后开始患者自控镇痛。监测术后曲马多消耗量、休息和活动时的疼痛评分以及运动阻滞持续时间。

结果

我们发现,与第1组(151±31.43 mg)相比,第2组(118±35.48 mg)和第3组(115±42.98 mg)的曲马多消耗量减少(p<0.05)。然而,与第1组(132.25±13.71分钟)和第2组(143.5±19.54分钟)相比,第3组(161±18.6分钟)的运动阻滞持续时间更长(达到布罗玛杰评分0的时间)(p<0.05)。

结论

我们发现,与20 mL用量相比,PENG阻滞中30 mL和40 mL用量导致曲马多消耗量更低。我们认为,30 mL用量是这三种用量中最合适的选择,因为它与40 mL用量具有相似的镇痛效果,但引起的运动阻滞较小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6459/12419048/70c0bc165673/tjmed-55-04-860f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6459/12419048/0c40d04bc7d2/tjmed-55-04-860f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6459/12419048/12e9c0117bde/tjmed-55-04-860f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6459/12419048/70c0bc165673/tjmed-55-04-860f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6459/12419048/0c40d04bc7d2/tjmed-55-04-860f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6459/12419048/12e9c0117bde/tjmed-55-04-860f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6459/12419048/70c0bc165673/tjmed-55-04-860f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Different local anesthetic volumes in pericapsular nerve group block for hip fracture patients.髋关节骨折患者关节周围神经群阻滞中不同局部麻醉药容量的研究
Turk J Med Sci. 2025 Apr 22;55(4):860-867. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.6038. eCollection 2025.
2
Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block compared to intrathecal morphine for analgesic efficacy in total hip arthroplasty: A placebo-controlled randomized double-blind non-inferiority trial.全髋关节置换术中关节囊周围神经组(PENG)阻滞与鞘内注射吗啡镇痛效果的比较:一项安慰剂对照的随机双盲非劣效性试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2025 Sep;106:111921. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111921. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
3
Comparison of analgesic effect of pericapsular nerve group block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block on dynamic pain in patients with hip fractures: a randomized controlled trial.髋关节周围神经组阻滞与腹股沟上髂筋膜间隙阻滞对髋部骨折患者动态疼痛镇痛效果的比较:一项随机对照试验
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Aug 5;50(8):635-640. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105627.
4
Comparison of the perioperative efficacy of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and the suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (S-FICB) in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: Spinal positioning, medication usage, and patient satisfaction.髋关节骨折手术患者围手术期囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞与腹股沟上髂筋膜间隙阻滞(S-FICB)疗效比较:脊柱定位、药物使用及患者满意度
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2025 Jul;31(7):705-711. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2025.19802.
5
Comparative analysis of continuous pericapsular nerve group block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block for postoperative analgesia in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.连续关节周围神经组阻滞与腹股沟上髂筋膜间隙阻滞用于全髋关节置换术后镇痛的比较分析:一项随机对照试验
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Aug 6;20(1):729. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06055-w.
6
Perineural dexamethasone effectively prolongs anaesthesic block duration in total hip arthroplasty, reduces opioid consumption, and does not compromise motor function, nerve integrity, or glycaemic control.神经周围注射地塞米松可有效延长全髋关节置换术中麻醉阻滞时间,减少阿片类药物用量,且不影响运动功能、神经完整性或血糖控制。
Int Orthop. 2025 Aug;49(8):1791-1799. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06578-1. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
7
Chemical hip denervation using phenol via Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block in palliative non-operative management for frail older hip fracture patients: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.在体弱老年髋部骨折患者的姑息性非手术治疗中,通过关节囊周围神经组(PENG)阻滞使用苯酚进行化学性髋关节去神经支配:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Anesth. 2025 Jul;105:111872. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111872. Epub 2025 May 27.
8
Is Local Infiltration Analgesia Superior to Peripheral Nerve Blockade for Pain Management After THA: A Network Meta-analysis.全髋关节置换术后疼痛管理中,局部浸润镇痛是否优于外周神经阻滞:一项网状Meta分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):495-516. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4619-9. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
9
Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) vs. pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block in total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial.老年患者全髋关节置换术中竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)与关节周围神经丛(PENG)阻滞的比较:一项随机、双盲、对照试验
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2025 May 15;57(1):90-98. doi: 10.5114/ait/203170.
10
The effect of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on postoperative analgesia in elderly patients who underwent proximal femoral nail anti-rotation surgery: a prospective, randomized-controlled trial.囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞对老年股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)手术后患者术后镇痛效果的影响:一项前瞻性、随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Nov 21;24(1):421. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02805-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Early mobilisation after hip fracture surgery reduces the risk of infection: an inverse probability of treatment weighted analysis.髋部骨折手术后早期活动可降低感染风险:一项倾向评分加权分析。
Age Ageing. 2025 Jan 6;54(1). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf007.
2
Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block versus fascia iliaca compartment (FI) block for hip surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.关节囊周围神经群(PENG)阻滞与股神经周围筋膜腔(FI)阻滞在髋关节手术中的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2023 Nov-Dec;73(6):794-809. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2023.07.007. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
3
Effect of Early Mobilization on Hip and Lower Extremity Postoperative: A Literature Review.
早期活动对髋关节及下肢术后的影响:文献综述
SAGE Open Nurs. 2023 Apr 11;9:23779608231167825. doi: 10.1177/23779608231167825. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
4
Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for early pain management of elderly patients with hip fracture: a single-center double-blind randomized controlled trial.囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞用于老年髋部骨折患者的早期疼痛管理:一项单中心、双盲、随机对照试验。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Nov;48(11):535-539. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-104117. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
5
Cadaveric study investigating the femoral nerve-sparing volume for pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block.尸体研究调查了髋关节囊周围神经群(PENG)阻滞的股神经保留体积。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Nov;48(11):549-552. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104419. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
6
A comparison of different volumes of bupivacaine used in fascia iliaca compartment block.比较不同容量布比卡因用于髂筋膜间隙阻滞。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Mar;29(3):337-343. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.51268.
7
Comparison of analgesic efficacy of different local anesthetic volumes for erector spinae plane block in thoracotomy patients; a prospective randomized trial.不同局麻药容量用于开胸手术患者竖脊肌平面阻滞的镇痛效果比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Feb 6;23(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02004-4.
8
Randomized comparison between pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for total hip arthroplasty.随机比较囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞与骼腹股沟筋膜阻滞在全髋关节置换术中的应用。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Oct;46(10):874-878. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102997. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
9
A possible mechanism of motor blockade of high volume pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block: A cadaveric study.大容量关节周围神经群(PENG)阻滞运动阻滞的一种可能机制:一项尸体研究。
J Clin Anesth. 2021 Nov;74:110407. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110407. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
10
Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block provides improved short-term analgesia compared with the femoral nerve block in hip fracture surgery: a single-center double-blinded randomized comparative trial.关节囊周围神经群(PENG)阻滞与股神经阻滞相比,可为髋关节骨折手术提供更好的短期镇痛效果:一项单中心、双盲、随机对照试验。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 May;46(5):398-403. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102315. Epub 2021 Feb 26.