Suppr超能文献

药物制剂专家调查的见解:高浓度皮下生物药物开发中的挑战与偏好

Insights from a Survey of Drug Formulation Experts: Challenges and Preferences in High-Concentration Subcutaneous Biologic Drug Development.

作者信息

Desai Mehul, Kundu Amitava, Hageman Michael, Lou Hao, Tenjarla Srini, Sun Changquan Calvin, Zhang Feng, Rahman Omar

机构信息

Enable Injections, Inc., 2863 East Sharon Rd, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45241, USA.

Manufacturing Sciences, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Brooklyn Park, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

AAPS J. 2025 Sep 11;27(6):142. doi: 10.1208/s12248-025-01132-8.

Abstract

Increasing the concentration of intravenous (IV) biologic formulations to render them appropriate for subcutaneous (SC) delivery is challenging because it impacts many interrelated variables, including volume, viscosity, and stability. This study gathered drug formulation expert insights regarding these challenges as well as development approach preferences and perceptions concerning formulation volume. Biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry experts familiar with creating high-concentration (≥ 100 mg/mL) biologic drug formulations for SC delivery completed an online survey between 26 April and 7 May 2024. In total, there were 100 respondents included. When asked to rank seven approaches to transitioning a formulation from IV to SC administration, responses showed that increasing drug concentrations to reduce injection volume and/or changing the primary container were considered riskier, more time-consuming, and more costly than maintaining the concentration and using an on-body delivery system (OBDS). The greatest challenges mentioned were solubility issues (75%), viscosity-related challenges (72%), and aggregation issues (68%). Most respondents (69%) reported delays in clinical trials or product launches due to high-concentration SC formulation challenges. Of these, 33.3% experienced delays of 6-9 months (weighted mean: 11.3 months), while 4.3% indicated that trials or launches were canceled entirely due to formulation difficulties. In conclusion, making minimal drug formulation concentration changes to an IV biologic formulation may reduce the risk, time commitment, and cost associated with developing a SC biologic formulation. Further education is needed around the transition of traditional IV formulations to low-concentration, large-volume SC formulations utilizing delivery formats such as an SC infusion pump or OBDS.

摘要

提高静脉注射(IV)生物制剂的浓度以使其适合皮下(SC)给药具有挑战性,因为这会影响许多相互关联的变量,包括体积、粘度和稳定性。本研究收集了药物制剂专家对于这些挑战的见解,以及关于制剂体积的开发方法偏好和看法。熟悉制备用于皮下给药的高浓度(≥100 mg/mL)生物药物制剂的生物技术和制药行业专家于2024年4月26日至5月7日完成了一项在线调查。总共纳入了100名受访者。当被要求对将制剂从静脉注射转换为皮下给药的七种方法进行排序时,回答表明,与保持浓度并使用体内给药系统(OBDS)相比,提高药物浓度以减少注射体积和/或更换主要容器被认为风险更高、耗时更长且成本更高。提及的最大挑战是溶解性问题(75%)、粘度相关挑战(72%)和聚集问题(68%)。大多数受访者(69%)报告称,由于高浓度皮下制剂的挑战,临床试验或产品上市出现延迟。其中,33.3%经历了6至9个月的延迟(加权平均值:11.3个月),而4.3%表示试验或上市因制剂困难而完全取消。总之,对静脉生物制剂进行最小限度的药物制剂浓度变化可能会降低开发皮下生物制剂的风险、时间投入和成本。需要围绕传统静脉制剂向利用皮下输液泵或OBDS等给药形式的低浓度、大体积皮下制剂的转变开展进一步教育。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验