Xu Yu-Ying, Xu Wen-Tan, Pan Wei-Ping, Guo Xie-Li, Li Xiao-Min, Xu Su-Mei, Yan Shao-Wei, Cai Wen-Ke, Yan Xin-Bin, Zhong Wen-Jing, Chen Shi-Lin, Xu Ping-Sheng
Department of Pharmacy, Jinjiang Municipal Hospital (Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Fujian), Quanzhou, Fujian, China.
Drug Clinical Trial Institution, Jinjiang Municipal Hospital (Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Fujian Campus), Quanzhou, Fujian, China.
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2025 Sep 11. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.1597.
This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) and bioequivalence (BE) of valsartan and amlodipine (80/5 mg) tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. A randomized, open-label, four-period crossover trial was conducted, with participants receiving test (T) or reference (R) formulations in cycles separated by a 14-day washout. Plasma concentrations of valsartan and amlodipine were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PK parameters were analyzed noncompartmentally, and BE was evaluated using reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) for high-variability parameters (CV ≥ 30%) and average bioequivalence (ABE) for low-variability parameters (CV < 30%). Under fasting conditions, the maximum concentration of drug in blood plasma (C) of valsartan was assessed using RSABE methodology and demonstrated bioequivalence. For amlodipine, bioequivalence was established through conventional ABE analysis, with the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of C, AUC, and AUC all residing within the predefined equivalence boundaries. Under postprandial conditions, both drugs met BE criteria using ABE, with 90% CIs of GMRs within the acceptable range. Importantly, postprandial administration resulted in a significant reduction of approximately 30% in systemic exposure of valsartan for both test and reference formulations. All adverse events were mild and transient. The T and R formulations demonstrated bioequivalence and were well tolerated, supporting their interchangeability.
本研究评估了缬沙坦氨氯地平(80/5毫克)片剂在健康中国受试者空腹和进食条件下的药代动力学(PK)和生物等效性(BE)。开展了一项随机、开放标签、四周期交叉试验,参与者按周期接受试验(T)或参比(R)制剂,各周期之间有14天的洗脱期。使用高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定血浆中缬沙坦和氨氯地平的浓度。采用非房室模型分析法分析PK参数,对于高变异参数(变异系数CV≥30%),使用参比标化平均生物等效性(RSABE)评估BE;对于低变异参数(CV<30%),使用平均生物等效性(ABE)评估BE。在空腹条件下,采用RSABE方法评估缬沙坦血浆药物最大浓度(Cmax),结果显示具有生物等效性。对于氨氯地平,通过传统的ABE分析确定生物等效性,Cmax、AUC(0-t)和AUC(0-∞)几何平均比(GMR)的90%置信区间(CI)均在预定义的等效边界内。在餐后条件下,两种药物均采用ABE法符合BE标准,GMR的90%CI在可接受范围内。重要的是,对于试验制剂和参比制剂,餐后给药均使缬沙坦的全身暴露量显著降低约30%。所有不良事件均为轻度且短暂。试验制剂和参比制剂显示具有生物等效性且耐受性良好,支持二者可互换使用。