Hounslow Jenna L, Fossette Sabrina, van Rooijen Arnold, Tucker Anton D, Whiting Scott D, Gleiss Adrian C
Centre for Sustainable Aquatic Ecosystems, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
Environmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
Ecol Appl. 2025 Sep;35(6):e70095. doi: 10.1002/eap.70095.
Habitat suitability models (HSMs) are popular statistical tools used to inform decision-making for conservation planning, using species location data to characterize species-environment relationships and identify important habitats. Suitable habitats may vary according to behavior-specific resource requirements (e.g., foraging, resting), yet HSMs generally ignore behavior because obtaining spatially explicit behavioral data from wild animals is challenging. As such, suitable habitats may be incorrectly identified, and processes determining habitat selection may be misinterpreted. Despite offering unprecedented behavioral insight, contemporary multi-sensor biologgers remain underutilized in this context. We incorporated behavior into HSMs using biologging data collected from adult flatback turtles Natator depressus (n = 42) at a macrotidal study site in Western Australia and subsequently identified and characterized suitable habitat for key in-water behaviors. Foraging and resting locations derived from high-resolution motion sensor data (e.g., accelerometer, magnetometer) coupled with animal-borne video and GPS data were combined with 10 environmental features (i.e., bathymetry, aspect, slope, terrain ruggedness, distance from the coast and currents from a bespoke hydrodynamic model of the study site). A series of random forest HSMs were implemented for each behavior, accounting for temporal variation in habitat use. Bathymetry, distance from the coast, and currents best determined both foraging and resting suitability, with observed differences in habitat selection between behaviors. Overall, spatiotemporal patterns of most suitable foraging and resting habitat were similar, with shallow (10-15 m deep) nearshore (5-10 km from the coast) waters most suitable for both behaviors; however, habitats nearest to the coast (<5 km) were more suitable for foraging than resting. Overall, for foraging and resting, as water level increased turtles selected increasingly nearshore habitats where current speed was low and more variable direction. Overlap between most suitable habitats and current spatial zoning at the study site varied both seasonally and with water level, likely reflecting strong tidal influence on distribution and hence highlighting considerable opportunity for dynamic management. Our approach facilitates mechanistic insight into habitat selection and is generalizable across behaviors, taxa, and study systems, advancing the application of biologging tools to enhance the utility of HSMs and providing crucial context for decision-makers in threatened species management.
栖息地适宜性模型(HSMs)是一种流行的统计工具,用于为保护规划提供决策依据,利用物种位置数据来描述物种与环境的关系,并识别重要栖息地。适宜的栖息地可能因特定行为的资源需求(如觅食、休息)而有所不同,但HSMs通常忽略行为因素,因为从野生动物获取空间明确的行为数据具有挑战性。因此,可能会错误地识别适宜栖息地,并且可能会误解决定栖息地选择的过程。尽管当代多传感器生物记录器提供了前所未有的行为洞察,但在这种情况下仍未得到充分利用。我们利用从澳大利亚西部一个大潮差研究地点的成年平背龟(Natator depressus,n = 42)收集的生物记录数据,将行为纳入HSMs,随后识别并描述了关键水中行为的适宜栖息地。从高分辨率运动传感器数据(如加速度计、磁力计)以及动物携带的视频和GPS数据中得出的觅食和休息位置,与10个环境特征(即水深、坡向、坡度、地形崎岖度、距海岸距离以及来自研究地点定制水动力模型的水流)相结合。针对每种行为实施了一系列随机森林HSMs,考虑了栖息地利用的时间变化。水深、距海岸距离和水流最能决定觅食和休息的适宜性,不同行为在栖息地选择上存在明显差异。总体而言,最适宜觅食和休息栖息地的时空模式相似,浅海(10 - 15米深)近岸(距海岸5 - 10公里)水域对两种行为都最为适宜;然而,最靠近海岸(<5公里)的栖息地更适合觅食而非休息。总体而言,对于觅食和休息,随着水位上升,海龟选择越来越靠近海岸的栖息地,那里水流速度较低且方向变化更大。研究地点最适宜栖息地与当前空间分区之间的重叠随季节和水位而变化,这可能反映了潮汐对分布的强烈影响,从而凸显了动态管理的巨大机会。我们的方法有助于对栖息地选择进行机制性洞察,并且可以推广到各种行为、分类群和研究系统,推动生物记录工具的应用,以提高HSMs的效用,并为濒危物种管理中的决策者提供关键背景信息。