Suppr超能文献

青少年正畸治疗合作情况的差异:Z 世代与 Y 世代对比

Differences in the cooperation of teenagers for orthodontic treatment: Z Generation versus Y Generation.

作者信息

Miron Nitsan, Shpack Nir, Joachim Michael V, Laviv Amir

机构信息

Private Practice, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Senior Faculty, Department of Orthodontics, Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2025 May 8;95(5):538-543. doi: 10.2319/112324-960.1. eCollection 2025 Sep.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare orthodontic treatment cooperation between Generation Y and Generation Z teenagers and evaluate influence of age on compliance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study analyzing records of 124 patients (62 from each generation) treated at Tel Aviv University Dental School between 2007 and 2021. Patient cooperation was assessed through weighted noncompliance scores incorporating elastic or headgear wear, oral hygiene, appointment attendance, appliance breakage, and new caries development. Each noncompliance incident was weighted (1.0 point for major incidents, 0.5 for minor) and standardized by treatment duration. Multiple regression analysis accounted for age differences.

RESULTS

Mean age differed significantly between Generation Y (15.5 ± 1.7 years) and Generation Z (13.1 ± 1.6 years; < .001). Initial noncooperation scores were similar (Generation Y: 36.8% ± 16.4%; Generation Z: 35.8% ± 15.8%; = .732). After age adjustment, regression analysis revealed significantly higher noncooperation in Generation Y (B = 8.29; = .014). Age independently influenced cooperation, with each year increase associated with a 3% decrease in noncooperation scores (B = -3.04; < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Generation Z teenagers exhibited better orthodontic treatment cooperation than Generation Y after age adjustment. Age independently predicted cooperation, with older teenagers showing better compliance regardless of generation. Treatment planning should consider both generational differences and individual patient factors when selecting compliance-dependent treatment options.

摘要

目的

比较Y世代和Z世代青少年在正畸治疗中的合作情况,并评估年龄对依从性的影响。

材料与方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,分析了2007年至2021年在特拉维夫大学牙科学院接受治疗的124例患者(每代62例)的记录。通过纳入弹性牵引或头帽佩戴、口腔卫生、就诊依从性、矫治器损坏和新发龋齿情况的加权不依从性评分来评估患者的合作情况。每个不依从事件进行加权(重大事件为1.0分,轻微事件为0.5分),并按治疗持续时间进行标准化。多元回归分析考虑了年龄差异。

结果

Y世代(15.5±1.7岁)和Z世代(13.1±1.6岁;P<.001)的平均年龄存在显著差异。初始不合作评分相似(Y世代:36.8%±16.4%;Z世代:35.8%±15.8%;P=.732)。年龄调整后,回归分析显示Y世代的不合作情况显著更高(B=8.29;P=.014)。年龄独立影响合作情况,每增加一岁,不合作评分降低3%(B=-3.04;P<.001)。

结论

年龄调整后,Z世代青少年在正畸治疗中的合作情况优于Y世代。年龄独立预测合作情况,无论哪一代,年龄较大的青少年依从性更好。在选择依赖依从性的治疗方案时,治疗计划应同时考虑代际差异和个体患者因素。

相似文献

3
Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth in children.儿童上前牙前突的正畸治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD003452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub2.
9
Orthodontic treatment for crowded teeth in children.儿童牙齿拥挤的正畸治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 31;12(12):CD003453. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003453.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Aligners, can my child use them too?牙套,我的孩子可以用吗?
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2023 Dec 1;24(4):259. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2023.24.04.01.
3
Psychology of aesthetics: Beauty, social media, and body dysmorphic disorder.美学心理学:美、社交媒体与身体变形障碍
Clin Dermatol. 2023 Jan-Feb;41(1):28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
9
No-shows in appointment scheduling - a systematic literature review.失约于预约安排 - 系统文献回顾。
Health Policy. 2018 Apr;122(4):412-421. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验