Miron Nitsan, Shpack Nir, Joachim Michael V, Laviv Amir
Private Practice, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Senior Faculty, Department of Orthodontics, Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Angle Orthod. 2025 May 8;95(5):538-543. doi: 10.2319/112324-960.1. eCollection 2025 Sep.
To compare orthodontic treatment cooperation between Generation Y and Generation Z teenagers and evaluate influence of age on compliance.
This was a retrospective cohort study analyzing records of 124 patients (62 from each generation) treated at Tel Aviv University Dental School between 2007 and 2021. Patient cooperation was assessed through weighted noncompliance scores incorporating elastic or headgear wear, oral hygiene, appointment attendance, appliance breakage, and new caries development. Each noncompliance incident was weighted (1.0 point for major incidents, 0.5 for minor) and standardized by treatment duration. Multiple regression analysis accounted for age differences.
Mean age differed significantly between Generation Y (15.5 ± 1.7 years) and Generation Z (13.1 ± 1.6 years; < .001). Initial noncooperation scores were similar (Generation Y: 36.8% ± 16.4%; Generation Z: 35.8% ± 15.8%; = .732). After age adjustment, regression analysis revealed significantly higher noncooperation in Generation Y (B = 8.29; = .014). Age independently influenced cooperation, with each year increase associated with a 3% decrease in noncooperation scores (B = -3.04; < .001).
Generation Z teenagers exhibited better orthodontic treatment cooperation than Generation Y after age adjustment. Age independently predicted cooperation, with older teenagers showing better compliance regardless of generation. Treatment planning should consider both generational differences and individual patient factors when selecting compliance-dependent treatment options.
比较Y世代和Z世代青少年在正畸治疗中的合作情况,并评估年龄对依从性的影响。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,分析了2007年至2021年在特拉维夫大学牙科学院接受治疗的124例患者(每代62例)的记录。通过纳入弹性牵引或头帽佩戴、口腔卫生、就诊依从性、矫治器损坏和新发龋齿情况的加权不依从性评分来评估患者的合作情况。每个不依从事件进行加权(重大事件为1.0分,轻微事件为0.5分),并按治疗持续时间进行标准化。多元回归分析考虑了年龄差异。
Y世代(15.5±1.7岁)和Z世代(13.1±1.6岁;P<.001)的平均年龄存在显著差异。初始不合作评分相似(Y世代:36.8%±16.4%;Z世代:35.8%±15.8%;P=.732)。年龄调整后,回归分析显示Y世代的不合作情况显著更高(B=8.29;P=.014)。年龄独立影响合作情况,每增加一岁,不合作评分降低3%(B=-3.04;P<.001)。
年龄调整后,Z世代青少年在正畸治疗中的合作情况优于Y世代。年龄独立预测合作情况,无论哪一代,年龄较大的青少年依从性更好。在选择依赖依从性的治疗方案时,治疗计划应同时考虑代际差异和个体患者因素。