Zhang Qianchen, Freeman Jincong Q, Zhao Fangyuan, Chen Nan, Nanda Rita, Huo Dezheng, Howard Frederick M
Committee on Computational and Applied Mathematics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
JCO Oncol Adv. 2024;1. doi: 10.1200/oa.24.00016. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapy improves outcomes in HER2+ breast cancer, but efficacy in cases with discordant immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) results or with ASCO/College of American Pathologists (CAP) group 2-4 ISH results remains uncertain.
This retrospective study included patients from the National Cancer Database diagnosed from 2013 to 2021. Cases were classified as classically HER2+ (HER2/centromeric region of chromosome 17 [CEP17] ratio ≥2 with HER2 copy number ≥4, IHC 2-3+), HER2- (ratio <2, copy number <4, IHC 0-2+), discordant ISH/IHC, or HER2+ with ISH group 2 (ratio ≥2, copy number <4), group 3 (ratio <2, copy number ≥6), or group 4 (ratio <2, copy number ≥4 and <6) per ASCO/CAP guidelines. Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for pathologic complete response (pCR) for these subgroups receiving HER2-targeted therapy was calculated compared with HER2- controls.
We identified N = 144,013 patients with IHC and dual-probe ISH. Of HER2 IHC 3+ cases (n = 8,579), 8.2%, 2.8%, 4.2%, and 8.8% had ISH categorized as groups 2, 3, 4, and 5 (discordant negative), respectively. Classically, HER2+ (aOR, 2.9 [95% CI, 2.65 to 3.18], < .001) and group 2 (aOR, 2.38 [95% CI, 1.42 to 3.96], < .001) treated with HER2-targeted therapy had higher pCR than HER2- controls. Benefit was also seen in group 3 (aOR, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.24 to 2.13], < .001) and cases with discordant ISH+/IHC- (aOR, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.13 to 2.30], = .008)-but this was only significant in group 3 cases with copy number ≥8 and discordant ISH+/IHC- cases with HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥3. Group 4 ISH cases and cases with ISH-/IHC+ did not benefit.
Patients with ASCO/CAP group 4, discordant ISH-/IHC+ results, and weakly amplified group 3 and discordant ISH+/IHC- have low benefit from HER2 therapy, and alternative approaches for such patients are needed.
人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)靶向治疗可改善HER2阳性乳腺癌的预后,但免疫组化(IHC)和原位杂交(ISH)结果不一致的病例或美国临床肿瘤学会/美国病理学家协会(ASCO/CAP)2-4组ISH结果的病例的疗效仍不确定。
这项回顾性研究纳入了2013年至2021年在国家癌症数据库中诊断的患者。病例分为经典HER2阳性(HER2/17号染色体着丝粒区域[CEP17]比值≥2且HER2拷贝数≥4,IHC 2-3+)、HER2阴性(比值<2,拷贝数<4,IHC 0-2+)、ISH/IHC结果不一致或根据ASCO/CAP指南为HER2阳性且ISH为2组(比值≥2,拷贝数<4)、3组(比值<2,拷贝数≥6)或4组(比值<2,拷贝数≥4且<6)。计算这些接受HER2靶向治疗的亚组与HER2阴性对照相比的病理完全缓解(pCR)的调整优势比(aOR)。
我们确定了N = 144,013例进行了IHC和双探针ISH检测的患者。在HER2 IHC 3+病例(n = 8,579)中,分别有8.2%、2.8%、4.2%和8.8%的ISH被分类为2、3、4和5组(不一致阴性)。经典HER2阳性(aOR,2.9[95%CI,2.65至3.18],<.001)和2组(aOR,2.38[95%CI,1.42至3.96],<.001)接受HER2靶向治疗的pCR高于HER2阴性对照。3组(aOR,1.63[95%CI,1.24至2.13],<.001)和ISH+/IHC-结果不一致的病例(aOR,1.61[95%CI,1.13至2.30],=.008)也有获益——但仅在拷贝数≥8的3组病例和HER2/CEP17比值≥3的ISH+/IHC-结果不一致的病例中显著。4组ISH病例和ISH-/IHC+病例未获益。
ASCO/CAP 4组、ISH-/IHC+结果不一致、弱扩增的3组和ISH+/IHC-结果不一致的患者从HER2治疗中获益较低,需要针对此类患者的替代方法。