Suppr超能文献

快速菌血症应对方案对菌血症管理及死亡率的影响。

Effect of a rapid bacteraemia response programme on bacteraemia management and mortality.

作者信息

Moore Sarah E, Wilde Ashley M, Junkins Alan D, Schulz Paul S, Frazier James M, Furmanek Stephen, Ramirez Julio A

机构信息

Norton Infectious Diseases Institute, Norton Healthcare, 4950 Norton Healthcare Boulevard, Suite 303, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.

Department of Microbiology, Norton Healthcare, 2935 Breckenridge Lane, Suite 101, Louisville, KY 40220, USA.

出版信息

JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2025 Sep 10;7(5):dlaf139. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaf139. eCollection 2025 Oct.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

bacteraemia confers significant morbidity and mortality. A multi-disciplinary team was created to optimize bacteraemia management.

METHODS

The intervention included integration of rapid diagnostic blood culture processing and a multi-disciplinary approach to real-time management of results. This was a retrospective, pre-post study to compare outcomes in the standard of care (SOC,  = 50) and intervention ( = 100) groups of patients with community-onset bacteraemia. Patients were excluded for death before Gram stain result, leaving against medical advice, polymicrobial bacteraemia or withdrawal of life sustaining treatments during hospitalization. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital, 6 month and 1 year mortality as well as -related readmission and time to effective antibiotic therapy.

RESULTS

54% of the SOC group and 46% of the intervention group had methicillin-resistant infections. The primary outcome, 30-day mortality, was 3% in the intervention group compared to 20% in the SOC group ( = 0.004). There was no difference in in-hospital mortality ( = 0.08) but lower mortality in the intervention group at 30 days ( = 0.003), 6 months ( = 0.005) and 1 year ( < 0.001). -related readmission was significantly lower at 31 days-6 months after discharge in the intervention group. Median time to effective antibiotic therapy was 13 h versus 6.3 h in the SOC and intervention groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The integration of real-time rapid diagnostic blood culture technology tied to immediate clinical actions was associated with improved time to effective therapy and mortality in patients with community-onset bacteraemia.

摘要

背景

菌血症会导致显著的发病率和死亡率。为此组建了一个多学科团队以优化菌血症的管理。

方法

干预措施包括整合快速诊断血培养流程以及采用多学科方法对结果进行实时管理。这是一项回顾性的前后对照研究,旨在比较社区获得性菌血症患者的标准治疗组(SOC,n = 50)和干预组(n = 100)的结局。排除在革兰氏染色结果出来之前死亡、擅自离院、多重微生物菌血症或住院期间停止维持生命治疗的患者。主要结局是30天全因死亡率。次要结局包括住院死亡率、6个月和1年死亡率以及相关再入院率和有效抗生素治疗时间。

结果

SOC组54%和干预组46%的患者发生耐甲氧西林感染。主要结局30天死亡率,干预组为3%,而SOC组为20%(P = 0.004)。住院死亡率无差异(P = 0.08),但干预组在30天(P = 0.003)、6个月(P = 0.005)和1年(P < 0.001)时死亡率较低。干预组出院后31天至6个月的相关再入院率显著更低。SOC组和干预组有效抗生素治疗的中位时间分别为13小时和6.3小时。

结论

将实时快速诊断血培养技术与即时临床行动相结合,与社区获得性菌血症患者有效治疗时间的缩短和死亡率的降低相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验