• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Stakeholders' longitudinal perspectives on a large public housing redevelopment in Los Angeles, California.利益相关者对加利福尼亚州洛杉矶市一个大型公共住房重建项目的纵向看法。
J Urban Regen Renew. 2024 Fall;18(1):75-93. doi: 10.69554/bvsj4487.
2
Community Social Cohesion During a Large Public Housing and Neighborhood Redevelopment: A Mixed Methods Study.大型公共住房与社区重建过程中的社区社会凝聚力:一项混合方法研究
Societies (Basel). 2025 May;15(5). doi: 10.3390/soc15050140. Epub 2025 May 20.
3
Redeveloping Low-Income Communities and Residents' Mental Health: Evidence From a Natural Experiment in Watts, Los Angeles.重建低收入社区与居民心理健康:来自洛杉矶瓦茨自然实验的证据
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Jul;69(1):107631. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.04.001. Epub 2025 Apr 18.
4
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
5
Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study.针对四个地区的地方、区域和国家孕产妇保健系统的疫情后规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(35):1-25. doi: 10.3310/HHTE6611.
6
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.
7
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
8
Implementation of link workers in primary care: Synopsis of findings from a realist evaluation.基层医疗中联络人员的实施:现实主义评价的结果概要
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(27):1-30. doi: 10.3310/KHGT9993.
9
Patient buy-in to social prescribing through link workers as part of person-centred care: a realist evaluation.患者通过联络人员接受社会处方作为以患者为中心的护理的一部分:一项现实主义评价。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep 25:1-17. doi: 10.3310/ETND8254.
10
Housing improvements for health and associated socio-economic outcomes.改善住房对健康及相关社会经济成果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28(2):CD008657. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008657.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing impacts of redeveloping public housing communities on obesity in low-income minority residents: Rationale, study design, and baseline data from the Watts Neighborhood Health Study.评估公共住房社区重建对低收入少数族裔居民肥胖问题的影响:瓦茨社区健康研究的基本原理、研究设计和基线数据
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Dec 9;25:100879. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100879. eCollection 2022 Feb.
2
Homeplace: Care and resistance among public housing residents facing mixed-income redevelopment.故土难离:面对混合收入再开发的公屋居民的关怀与抗争。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2020;90(5):523-534. doi: 10.1037/ort0000452. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
3
Clinical prediction in defined populations: a simulation study investigating when and how to aggregate existing models.特定人群中的临床预测:一项关于何时以及如何整合现有模型的模拟研究
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Jan 6;17(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0277-1.
4
Living in a mixed-income development: resident perceptions of the benefits and disadvantages of two developments in Chicago.居住在混合收入开发项目中:芝加哥两个开发项目的居民对其优缺点的看法。
Urban Stud. 2010;47(11):2347-366. doi: 10.1177/0042098009357959.

利益相关者对加利福尼亚州洛杉矶市一个大型公共住房重建项目的纵向看法。

Stakeholders' longitudinal perspectives on a large public housing redevelopment in Los Angeles, California.

作者信息

Perrigo Judith L, Scott Jose J, Shier Victoria, Datar Ashlesha

机构信息

Luskin School of Public Affairs, University of California, USA.

Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, USA.

出版信息

J Urban Regen Renew. 2024 Fall;18(1):75-93. doi: 10.69554/bvsj4487.

DOI:10.69554/bvsj4487
PMID:40937302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12422561/
Abstract

The Homeownership and Opportunity for People Everywhere VI programme (HOPE VI) model created a new approach to redeveloping public housing in the US, paving the way for the Choice Neighborhoods Initiative (CNI). Unlike traditional public housing redevelopment, CNI aims to revitalise entire ecosystems to create sustainable, thriving communities by focusing on housing, people, neighbourhoods and participatory community planning. This study used qualitative methods to explore the longitudinal perspectives of 12 stakeholders involved in a large CNI-funded public housing redevelopment project in Los Angeles, California. Our grounded theory analysis identified four key themes: (1) persistent community ghosts; (2) growing regeneration rooted in optimism and hope for the future; (3) displacement concerns; and (4) the emergence of a mixed-income dichotomy. These findings underscore the importance of continued community involvement in redevelopment efforts, especially in communities that bear complex historical and social challenges.

摘要

“全民住房拥有与机会 VI 计划”(HOPE VI)模式开创了美国公共住房重建的新方法,为“选择社区倡议”(CNI)铺平了道路。与传统的公共住房重建不同,CNI 旨在通过关注住房、居民、社区和参与性社区规划来振兴整个生态系统,以创建可持续发展、繁荣兴旺的社区。本研究采用定性方法,探讨了参与加利福尼亚州洛杉矶市一个由 CNI 资助的大型公共住房重建项目的 12 名利益相关者的纵向观点。我们基于扎根理论的分析确定了四个关键主题:(1)挥之不去的社区阴影;(2)源于对未来的乐观和希望的日益增长的复兴;(3)对搬迁的担忧;(4)混合收入二分法的出现。这些发现强调了社区持续参与重建工作的重要性,特别是在面临复杂历史和社会挑战的社区。