[Socio-economic factors and the dietary intake of the adult population of Russia].

The dietary intake of the population depends on a number of external socio-economic and individual behavioral factors. External factors, including physical and economic availability of food, are indicators of food security of the population, the absence of which increases the risk of malnutrition. The importance of the cost of food in combination with the income of an individual or family is an significant factor in food choice, affecting the quality of the diet. of this study was to examine the most significant socio-economic and demographic factors that could affect the nature and quality of diets of the adult population of the Russian Federation. . The work processed and analyzed the primary data obtained by the Federal State Statistics Service during the implementation of the program «Sample monitoring of diets of the population» in 2023 based on a random representative sample of 45 thousand households in all constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The actual food consumption of adult household members was studied using the 24-hour recall method in 70,995 respondents aged 19 years and older (40.2% men, 59.2% women). The basic socioeconomic variable of the analysis was the quintile distribution of average monthly per capita monetary income in households, calculated by the State Statistics Service based on data for each subject of the Federation, and not for the country as a whole. . The distribution of the adult population by the level of average monthly income is characterized by pronounced differentiation in the analyzed socio-demographic groups. The most of the adult population (78.4%) is concentrated in the first three income quintiles and only 21.6% are in the 4th and 5th quintiles. Differences in gender distribution are revealed only in the 5th quintile, which includes 7.5% of men and 5.6% of women. The minimum share in the 5th quintile is represented by the age group over 65 years. Significant differences in the distribution of adults by income depending on the level of education were revealed: the share of people with minimal income is the lowest with higher education. More than 50-60% of the population of the Federal Districts (FDs) are included in the 2nd and 3rd income quintiles, and the smallest share of the adult population in all FDs is concentrated in the 5th income quintile. The energy value of the diets of the population on average in Russia increases linearly with the growth of quintiles of average per capita household income. Data for five FDs indicate a linear direct dependence of the energy intake on the income level. However, data for the Far Eastern, Ural, and North Caucasian FDs show a more complex dependence of energy consumption on income level. In all FDs, with the exception of the North Caucasian FD, energy consumption in the 5th income quintile is higher than at lower incomes. Energy consumption in the 5th income quintile is lower than in the other quintiles only in the North Caucasian FD. In Russia as a whole, the average daily consumption of energy and most nutrients, with the exception of the sum of carbohydrates and their fractions, is significantly higher in adults with high incomes (5th quintile) compared to the 1st quintile. Consumption of protein, fat, saturated fatty acids and cholesterol, i.e. nutrients of animal origin, as well as vitamins C, B2, PP, A, beta-carotene, and mineral elements (calcium, iron, sodium, potassium, magnesium) is significantly increased in the 5th quintile. A direct dependence of the % of energy of fat, saturated fatty acids and protein on the value of the average per capita income was established. On the other hand, a statistically significant inverse dependence of the consumption of the sum of all carbohydrates, polysaccharides, and added sugar on the income level was shown. Thus, the economic station of the family in terms of per capita monetary income is reflected not only in the quantitative indicators of energy and nutrient consumption, but also significantly affects the basic parameters of the diet structure in terms of macronutrient energy, which are a consequence of changes in the structure of the food set. With an increase in the per capita family income, the consumption of animal products - meat, dairy, fish and seafood, as well as sugary confectionery products increases, although the consumption of added sugar with a high income was lower than with lower incomes. With an increase in income, the consumption of vegetables and fruits also elevates. An inverse dependence on income was established for grain products (the sum of bread, flour, cereals, pasta) and flour confectionery products (pastry), the consumption of which is higher with low incomes. Assessing the structure of the food set of the «poor» part of adults (1st income quintile), it should be noted that they consume lower amounts of dairy products and animal meat, which is reflected in the daily intake of vitamins A and B2, calcium and iron. The dependence of the nutritional value and food set of daily food rations on the share of family expenditure on food is also shown: with an increase in the share of food expenditure, the structure of the diet is formed, resembling that of low quintiles of per capita monetary income, which is explained by a higher share of food expenditure in low-income groups. . The study of the dietary intake and the quality of the diet of adults based on representative national data made it possible to demonstrate a significant impact of the per capita income of the household (family) on the actual consumption of energy and nutrients, as well as on the structure of the food set of the diet of adult household members. Conditionally called «poor» diet with low household incomes is characterized by a higher consumption of grain products and flour confectionery (pastry), which is reflected in an increase in the % of energy of the sum of carbohydrates and polysaccharides (starch). Accordingly, at high incomes, the consumption of these dietary factors is lower than at low incomes. However, with an increase in income, the consumption of fat, saturated fatty acids and cholesterol, the so-called critical nutrients of animal origin, increases, which cannot be assessed as a positive feature of a "rich" diet.