DeBar Lynn L, Wellman Robert D, Justice Morgan, Avins Andrew L, Beyrouty Matthew, Eng Carolyn M, Herman Patricia M, Nielsen Arya, Pressman Alice, Stone Katie L, Teets Raymond Y, Cook Andrea J
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Sep 2;8(9):e2531348. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.31348.
The study was carried out to inform Medicare acupuncture coverage decisions addressing the gap in evidence on acupuncture effectiveness, specifically for older adults with chronic low back pain (CLBP).
To determine the effectiveness of standard acupuncture (SA) or SA plus maintenance (enhanced acupuncture [EA]) to improve CLBP-related disability relative to usual medical care (UMC) at 3, 6, and 12 months after randomization.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multisite, 3-arm, parallel-group randomized clinical trial of older adults with CLBP collected data from 4 US health care systems in 3 geographic areas and compared SA and EA treatment with UMC only. Study enrollment was conducted from August 12, 2021, to October 27, 2022; follow-up concluded on November 7, 2023.
Both SA (8-15 treatment sessions over 12 weeks plus UMC) and EA (SA plus 4-6 maintenance sessions during the next 12 weeks) were provided by experienced, community-based licensed acupuncturists. Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to the 3 groups.
The primary outcome was CLBP-related disability measured by a baseline-to-6-month change in the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity and the percentage of participants with clinically meaningful (≥30%) improvements.
The trial identified 800 individuals who were randomized to 3 groups (mean [SD] age, 73.6 [6.0] years; 496 females [62.0%]). At 6 months, RMDQ change scores were significantly better in both the SA and EA groups compared with the UMC only group (SA vs UMC: adjusted mean difference, -1.0 [95% CI, -1.9 to -0.1] and EA vs UMC: adjusted mean difference, -1.5 [95% CI, -2.5 to -0.6]). SA and EA change scores did not differ significantly from one another. The relative benefit of acupuncture compared with UMC on disability persisted at 12 months. Pain intensity exhibited a relative benefit of EA over SA at 6 months, and both acupuncture groups had significant improvement over UMC. The adjusted percentage with clinically meaningful improvements in RMDQ at 6 months was greater for SA (39.1% [95% CI, 33.1%-46.1%]; adjusted relative risk, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.04-1.70]) and for EA (43.8% [95% CI, 38.0%-50.4%]; adjusted relative risk, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.19-1.86]) compared with UMC (29.4% [95% CI, 24.3%-35.5%]) and persisted at 12 months. Rates of serious adverse events were low and similar among groups, with less than 1% that was possibly acupuncture-intervention related.
The findings of this randomized clinical trial of older adults with CLBP suggest that acupuncture needling provided greater improvements in back pain-related disability at 6 months and at 12 months compared with UMC alone. These findings support acupuncture needling as an effective and safe treatment option for older adults with CLBP.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04982315.
开展这项研究是为了为医疗保险针灸覆盖范围决策提供信息,以解决针灸有效性证据方面的差距,特别是针对患有慢性下腰痛(CLBP)的老年人。
确定标准针灸(SA)或SA加维持治疗(强化针灸[EA])相对于常规医疗护理(UMC)在随机分组后3个月、6个月和12个月时改善CLBP相关残疾的效果。
设计、地点和参与者:这项针对患有CLBP的老年人的多中心、三臂、平行组随机临床试验从美国3个地理区域的4个医疗保健系统收集数据,仅将SA和EA治疗与UMC进行比较。研究入组时间为2021年8月12日至2022年10月27日;随访于2023年11月7日结束。
SA(12周内进行8 - 15次治疗疗程加UMC)和EA(SA加接下来12周内4 - 6次维持疗程)均由经验丰富的社区持牌针灸师提供。参与者按1:1:1随机分为3组。
主要结局是通过罗兰 - 莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ)评分从基线到6个月的变化来衡量的CLBP相关残疾。次要结局包括疼痛强度以及有临床意义(≥30%)改善的参与者百分比。
该试验确定了800名被随机分为3组的个体(平均[标准差]年龄,73.6[6.0]岁;496名女性[62.0%])。在6个月时,SA组和EA组的RMDQ变化评分均显著优于仅接受UMC的组(SA与UMC相比:调整后平均差异,-1.0[95%置信区间,-1.9至-0.1];EA与UMC相比:调整后平均差异,-1.5[95%置信区间,-2.5至-0.6])。SA组和EA组的变化评分彼此无显著差异。与UMC相比,针灸在残疾方面的相对益处持续到12个月。在6个月时,EA在疼痛强度方面相对于SA表现出相对益处,并且两个针灸组相对于UMC均有显著改善。在6个月时,SA组(39.1%[95%置信区间,33.1% - 46.1%];调整后相对风险,1.33[95%置信区间,1.04 - 1.70])和EA组(43.8%[95%置信区间,38.0% - 50.4%];调整后相对风险,1.49[95%置信区间,1.19 - 1.86])在RMDQ方面有临床意义改善的调整百分比高于UMC组(29.4%[95%置信区间,24.3% - 35.5%]),并且持续到12个月。严重不良事件发生率较低且各组相似,与针灸干预可能相关的不到1%。
这项针对患有CLBP的老年人的随机临床试验结果表明,与单独的UMC相比,针灸针刺在6个月和12个月时能更大程度地改善与背痛相关的残疾。这些发现支持针灸针刺作为患有CLBP的老年人一种有效且安全的治疗选择。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04982315。