Umeh K, Adaji S, Sacks M, Eleje G U, Umeh E O, Ushie S, Okafor C G, Oguejiofor C B, Bawa U, Bature S, Madugu N H, Singh R, Karuppuchamy H
School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Bousfield Health Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Sep 12;5(9):e0004794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004794. eCollection 2025.
Although the Safe Motherhood Initiative is currently a global priority, the implications of maternal self-medication for meeting Safe Motherhood and Sustainable Development Goal 3 objectives in low- and middle-income countries has yet to be addressed. Although local medical doctors are an influential stakeholder group, able to determine health policy, how they view and feel about the problem of antimicrobial self-medication during pregnancy is not well understood. Thus, this study explores physicians' views and sentiments regarding antibiotic self-medication in pregnant women from a West African country. We used mixed qualitative and quantitative analytic approaches. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 25 medical doctors working in three tertiary hospitals. Thematic analysis was employed to identify key perspectives, while sentiment analysis was used to determine the emotional tone, based on an open-source pre-trained machine learning model for natural language processing. Several checks for methodological rigour were performed, including reviewing records of over 800 email conversations, and conducting respondent validation. Seven distinct themes emerged depicting views on antimicrobial treatment (e.g., easy availability of antibiotics), patient behaviour (e.g., use of medicinal herbs) and policy guidelines on antibiotics stewardship (lack of clear protocols). The prevailing sentiment portrayed a predominantly neutral demeanour towards antibiotic self-medication during pregnancy (χ2 (1, N = 1484) = 1314.858, p < 0.001), with an unusually high number of neutral labels, compared with positive (z = -36.058, p < 0.001) and negative (z = -36.410, p < 0.001) categories. The results of this investigation can provide useful information for managing antibiotic self-medication in pregnant women from resource-deprived regions where medical doctors are influential stakeholders. Our findings can be used to tailor local Safe motherhood policy initiatives on antimicrobial stewardship during pregnancy such that they address physician's concerns and sentiments, including insufficient clinical practice guidelines and an ostensible lack of urgency.
尽管安全孕产倡议目前是一项全球优先事项,但在低收入和中等收入国家,孕产妇自我用药对实现安全孕产和可持续发展目标3的影响尚未得到解决。虽然当地医生是一个有影响力的利益相关者群体,能够决定卫生政策,但他们对孕期抗菌药物自我用药问题的看法和感受尚不清楚。因此,本研究探讨了来自西非国家的医生对孕妇抗生素自我用药的看法和情绪。我们采用了定性和定量相结合的分析方法。对在三家三级医院工作的25名医生进行了半结构化访谈。采用主题分析来确定关键观点,同时基于用于自然语言处理的开源预训练机器学习模型,使用情感分析来确定情感基调。进行了多项方法严谨性检查,包括审查800多封电子邮件对话记录,并进行受访者验证。出现了七个不同的主题,描述了对抗菌治疗的看法(例如,抗生素容易获得)、患者行为(例如,使用草药)和抗生素管理政策指南(缺乏明确的方案)。普遍的情绪表现为对孕期抗生素自我用药主要持中立态度(χ2(1, N = 1484) = 1314.858, p < 0.001),与积极(z = -36.058, p < 0.001)和消极(z = -36.410, p < 0.001)类别相比,中立标签的数量异常高。这项调查的结果可以为在资源匮乏地区管理孕妇抗生素自我用药提供有用信息,在这些地区医生是有影响力的利益相关者。我们的研究结果可用于调整当地关于孕期抗菌药物管理的安全孕产政策倡议,使其解决医生的担忧和情绪,包括临床实践指南不足和明显缺乏紧迫性的问题。