Xu Yinan, Prat Chantel S, Sense Florian, van Rijn Hedderik, Stocco Andrea
Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washinton, United States of America.
Neuroscience Program, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Sep 12;21(9):e1013485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013485. eCollection 2025 Sep.
Despite the importance of memories in everyday life and the progress made in understanding how they are encoded and retrieved, the neural processes by which declarative memories are maintained or forgotten remain elusive. Part of the problem is that it is empirically difficult to measure the rate at which memories fade, even between repeated presentations of the source of the memory. Without such a ground-truth measure, it is hard to identify the corresponding neural correlates. This study addresses this problem by comparing individual patterns of functional connectivity against behavioral differences in forgetting speed derived from computational phenotyping. Specifically, the individual-specific values of the speed of forgetting in long-term memory (LTM) were estimated for 33 participants using a formal model fit to accuracy and response time data from an adaptive paired-associate learning task. Individual speeds of forgetting were then used to examine participant-specific patterns of resting-state fMRI connectivity, using machine learning techniques to identify the most predictive and generalizable features. Our results show that individual speeds of forgetting are associated with resting-state connectivity within the default mode network (DMN) as well as between the DMN and cortical sensory areas. Cross-validation showed that individual speeds of forgetting were predicted with high accuracy (r = .77) from these connectivity patterns alone. These results support the view that DMN activity and the associated sensory regions are actively involved in maintaining memories and preventing their decline, a view that can be seen as evidence for the hypothesis that forgetting is a result of storage degradation, rather than of retrieval failure.
尽管记忆在日常生活中至关重要,而且在理解记忆如何编码和提取方面也取得了进展,但陈述性记忆得以维持或遗忘的神经过程仍然难以捉摸。部分问题在于,即使在重复呈现记忆源的情况下,从经验上衡量记忆消退的速度也很困难。没有这样一个基本事实的衡量标准,就很难确定相应的神经关联。本研究通过将个体功能连接模式与从计算表型分析得出的遗忘速度行为差异进行比较,来解决这个问题。具体而言,使用一个适合自适应配对联想学习任务的准确性和反应时间数据的正式模型,为33名参与者估计了长期记忆(LTM)中遗忘速度的个体特定值。然后,使用机器学习技术来识别最具预测性和通用性的特征,利用个体遗忘速度来检查静息态功能磁共振成像连接的参与者特定模式。我们的结果表明,个体遗忘速度与默认模式网络(DMN)内以及DMN与皮质感觉区域之间的静息态连接有关。交叉验证表明,仅从这些连接模式就能高精度地预测个体遗忘速度(r = 0.77)。这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即DMN活动和相关的感觉区域积极参与维持记忆并防止其衰退,这一观点可被视为遗忘是存储退化而非检索失败的假设的证据。