• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移动健康研究中主动和被动数据收集方法的可接受性:对美国在线成人样本的横断面调查

Acceptability of Active and Passive Data Collection Methods for Mobile Health Research: Cross-Sectional Survey of an Online Adult Sample in the United States.

作者信息

Roque Nelson, Felt John

机构信息

Center for Healthy Aging, The Pennsylvania State University, 422 Biobehavioral Health Building, University Park, PA, 16801, United States, 1 814-863-7502.

Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, 32816, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2025 Sep 12;9:e64082. doi: 10.2196/64082.

DOI:10.2196/64082
PMID:40939623
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12431785/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital health technologies, including wearable devices and app-based cognitive and health assessments, are pervasive and crucial to better understanding important public health problems (eg, Alzheimer's disease and related dementias). Central to understanding mechanisms driving individuals' willingness to share various data streams are concerns regarding data privacy, security, and control over generated data.

OBJECTIVE

This survey was designed to learn more about attitudes and opinions related to digital health technologies and the sharing of associated data.

METHODS

A total of 1509 adults were recruited from Prolific to complete an online survey via Qualtrics. Of these, 1489 participants provided valid data for analyses. Participants completed a structured survey consisting of multiple modules after informed consent was provided. These included: (1) demographic characteristics; (2) prior research experience; (3) mobility factors (eg, use of mobility aids, driving frequency); (4) technology ownership (eg, smartphones, tablets, home Wi-Fi); (5) social media use (eg, frequency of engagement with platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok); (6) willingness to contribute different types of data across categories, including activities, sensors, and metadata; (7) opinions about data control and privacy options (eg, data deletion, stream-specific control); and (8) willingness to interact with assistive technologies such as robots, for Instrumental Activities of Daily Living.

RESULTS

The final cohort (N=1489) had a mean age of 35.5 years (SD 12.0), was 44% female (n=652), and predominantly identified as White (76%, n=1134), with high rates of smartphone ownership (99%, n=1479) and home Wi-Fi access (98%, n=1464). Participants were most willing to share data streams with clear health implications and least willing to share data streams with greater privacy or reidentification potential (eg, GPS location, in-vehicle dashcam footage). On average, people were willing to complete ambulatory cognitive assessments for 56.7 (SD 36.2) days, air quality monitoring for 58.1 (SD 37.7) days, and GPS location monitoring for 37 (SD 39.0) days. People expected control over their data, including the ability to delete all or specific streams of the data contributed for research. Most participants prioritized control over their data, with 71% (n=1061) favoring the ability to delete all data contributed for research purposes. Stream-specific data deletion (65%, n=960) and time-specific deletion (44%, n=653) were also valued; interest in sharing data with insurance providers (30%, n=453) or caregivers (26%, n=384) was notably lower.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings have implications for the design of digital health technologies and education-related to the use and implications of collected data.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6e/12431785/3b1163d780d7/formative-v9-e64082-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6e/12431785/21d1a7d306a2/formative-v9-e64082-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6e/12431785/45cd9956011b/formative-v9-e64082-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6e/12431785/ad915b23dc15/formative-v9-e64082-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6e/12431785/3b1163d780d7/formative-v9-e64082-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6e/12431785/21d1a7d306a2/formative-v9-e64082-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6e/12431785/45cd9956011b/formative-v9-e64082-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6e/12431785/ad915b23dc15/formative-v9-e64082-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6e/12431785/3b1163d780d7/formative-v9-e64082-g004.jpg
摘要

背景

数字健康技术,包括可穿戴设备以及基于应用程序的认知和健康评估,已广泛普及,对于更好地理解重要的公共卫生问题(如阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症)至关重要。理解驱动个体愿意共享各类数据流的机制,核心在于对数据隐私、安全以及对所生成数据的控制权的担忧。

目的

本调查旨在进一步了解与数字健康技术及相关数据共享有关的态度和观点。

方法

通过Prolific招募了1509名成年人,通过Qualtrics完成在线调查。其中,1489名参与者提供了有效数据用于分析。参与者在提供知情同意后完成了一个包含多个模块的结构化调查。这些模块包括:(1)人口统计学特征;(2)既往研究经历;(3)行动因素(如使用行动辅助工具、驾驶频率);(4)技术拥有情况(如智能手机、平板电脑、家庭Wi-Fi);(5)社交媒体使用情况(如参与Facebook、Instagram和TikTok等平台的频率);(6)愿意贡献不同类型数据的意愿,包括活动、传感器和元数据;(7)对数据控制和隐私选项的看法(如数据删除、特定数据流控制);(8)与机器人等辅助技术进行互动以完成日常生活活动的意愿。

结果

最终队列(N = 1489)的平均年龄为35.5岁(标准差12.0),女性占44%(n = 652),主要为白人(76%,n = 1134),智能手机拥有率高(99%,n = 1479),家庭Wi-Fi接入率高(98%,n = 1464)。参与者最愿意共享对健康有明确影响的数据流,最不愿意共享具有更高隐私或重新识别潜力的数据流(如GPS位置、车内行车记录仪 footage)。平均而言,人们愿意进行动态认知评估56.7(标准差36.2)天,空气质量监测58.1(标准差37.7)天,GPS位置监测37(标准差39.0)天。人们期望对自己的数据进行控制,包括能够删除为研究贡献的所有或特定数据流。大多数参与者将数据控制权放在首位,71%(n = 1061)的人赞成能够删除为研究目的贡献的所有数据。特定数据流的数据删除(65%,n = 960)和特定时间的数据删除(44%,n = 653)也受到重视;与保险提供商(30%,n = 453)或护理人员(26%,n = 384)共享数据的兴趣明显较低。

结论

研究结果对数字健康技术的设计以及与所收集数据的使用和影响相关的教育具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
Acceptability of Active and Passive Data Collection Methods for Mobile Health Research: Cross-Sectional Survey of an Online Adult Sample in the United States.移动健康研究中主动和被动数据收集方法的可接受性:对美国在线成人样本的横断面调查
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Sep 12;9:e64082. doi: 10.2196/64082.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.
4
Smartphone Apps and Wearables for Health Parameters in Young Adulthood: Cross-Sectional Study.用于青年期健康参数的智能手机应用程序和可穿戴设备:横断面研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Sep 3;12:e64629. doi: 10.2196/64629.
5
Caregiver and Youth Characteristics That Influence Trust in Digital Health Platforms in Pediatric Care: Mixed Methods Study.照顾者和青少年特征对儿科护理中数字健康平台信任的影响:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 28;26:e53657. doi: 10.2196/53657.
6
Measuring Psychological Well-Being and Behaviors Using Smartphone-Based Digital Phenotyping: An Intensive Longitudinal Observational mHealth Pilot Study Embedded in a Prospective Cohort of Women.使用基于智能手机的数字表型分析测量心理健康与行为:一项嵌入女性前瞻性队列的密集纵向观察性移动健康试点研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Sep 3;13:e71375. doi: 10.2196/71375.
7
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
8
MarkVCID cerebral small vessel consortium: I. Enrollment, clinical, fluid protocols.马克 VCID 脑小血管联盟:一、入组、临床、液体方案。
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Apr;17(4):704-715. doi: 10.1002/alz.12215. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
9
A digital intervention to improve mental health and interpersonal resilience for young people who have experienced online sexual abuse: the i-Minds non-randomised feasibility clinical trial and nested qualitative study.一项针对遭受网络性虐待的年轻人改善心理健康和人际恢复力的数字干预措施:i-Minds非随机可行性临床试验及嵌套定性研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(28):1-27. doi: 10.3310/THAL8732.
10
Smartphone-Based Self-Monitoring in First Episode Psychosis: Mixed-Methods Study of Barriers and Facilitators to Engagement.首发精神病中基于智能手机的自我监测:参与障碍与促进因素的混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 26;27:e71989. doi: 10.2196/71989.

本文引用的文献

1
Sharing Data Collected with Smartphone Sensors: Willingness, Participation, and Nonparticipation Bias.共享通过智能手机传感器收集的数据:意愿、参与情况及不参与偏差。
Public Opin Q. 2021 Sep 3;85(Suppl 1):423-462. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfab025. eCollection 2021.
2
Patients' willingness to share digital health and non-health data for research: a cross-sectional study.患者愿意为研究分享数字健康和非健康数据:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Aug 8;19(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0886-9.
3
Data sharing as social dilemma: Influence of the researcher's personality.
作为社会困境的数据共享:研究者个性的影响
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 17;12(8):e0183216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183216. eCollection 2017.
4
Passive monitoring versus active assessment of clinical performance: impact on measured quality of care.被动监测与主动评估临床绩效:对测量的医疗质量的影响。
Med Care. 2011 Oct;49(10):883-90. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318222a36c.