Suppr超能文献

联合可逆性电穿孔与博来霉素治疗动静脉畸形

Combining Reversible Electroporation and Bleomycin in Treatment of Arteriovenous Malformations.

作者信息

Obereisenbuchner Florian, Schmidt Vanessa F, Goldann Constantin, Brill Richard, Puhr-Westerheide Daniel, Borisch Elena, Haehl Julia, Hartel Alexandra, Häberle Beate, Ricke Jens, Seidensticker Max, Kimm Melanie A, Wildgruber Moritz, Wohlgemuth Walter A

机构信息

Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Interdisciplinary Center for Vascular Anomalies (IZGA), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025 Sep 12. doi: 10.1007/s00270-025-04178-5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate and compare safety and clinical outcomes of reversible electroporation with either intravenous (BEST) or intraarterial (BEET) Bleomycin application treating extracranial AVMs unsuitable for conventional approaches defined as fine-fistulous AVMs close to vulnerable anatomical structures (such as skin/end-arteries) not amenable for embolization or resection due to inappropriate risk/benefit and/or therapy-refractory or recurrent lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a sub-analysis of the prospective multicenter APOLLON trial (German clinical trial register, DRKS00021019). Clinical and imaging findings were assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up to evaluate subjective outcome (symptom-free, partial relief, no improvement, clinical progression) and AVM lesion devascularization on MRI (total, 100%; substantial, 76-99%; partial, 51-75%; slight, 50%; progression). BEST versus BEET was at the discretion of the operator; subgroup outcome comparisons were subsequently performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-one AVM patients received 31 treatments (16/31 BEST, 51.6%; 15/31 BEET, 48.4%); the mean number of procedures per patient was 1.5 (± 0.7). Complications occurred after 7/31 (22.6%) procedures, including 6.4% major complications (delayed wound healing solved by split-skin transplantation, persistant scarring). Subjective outcome revealed partial symptom relief in 13/21 (61.9%) patients, and 4/21 (19.0%) patients presented symptom-free. In 4/21 (19.0%) patients, no improvement or symptom worsening was reported. Imaging revealed complete devascularization in one case (6.3%), substantial (76-99%) and partial (51-75%) devascularization in 6/16 (36.5%) patients, respectively, while progression was noted in 3/16 (18.8%) patients. Comparison of clinical outcomes differed between both approaches, with BEET being superior to BEST (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The combination of reversible electroporation and bleomycin is effective for treatment of AVMs; BEET tends to present superior to BEST regarding patients ' outcome.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估和比较静脉注射(BEST)或动脉内注射(BEET)博来霉素的可逆电穿孔治疗颅外动静脉畸形(AVM)的安全性和临床结果,这些AVM不适合传统治疗方法,定义为靠近脆弱解剖结构(如皮肤/终末动脉)的细瘘性AVM,由于风险/收益不合适和/或治疗难治性或复发性病变而无法进行栓塞或切除。

材料与方法

这是一项对前瞻性多中心APOLLON试验(德国临床试验注册,DRKS00021019)的亚分析。在基线和6个月随访时评估临床和影像学结果,以评估主观结果(无症状、部分缓解、无改善、临床进展)以及MRI上AVM病变的血管减少情况(完全,100%;显著,76 - 99%;部分,51 - 75%;轻微,50%;进展)。BEST与BEET的选择由操作者决定;随后进行亚组结果比较。

结果

21例AVM患者接受了31次治疗(16/31为BEST,51.6%;15/31为BEET,48.4%);每位患者的平均治疗次数为1.5(±0.7)。7/31(22.6%)次治疗后出现并发症,包括6.4%的严重并发症(通过植皮解决延迟伤口愈合、持续性瘢痕形成)。主观结果显示13/21(61.9%)的患者症状部分缓解,4/21(19.0%)的患者无症状。4/21(19.0%)的患者报告无改善或症状恶化。影像学显示1例(6.3%)完全血管减少,6/16(36.5%)的患者分别有显著(76 - 99%)和部分(51 - 75%)血管减少,而3/16(18.8%)的患者有进展。两种方法的临床结果比较存在差异,BEET优于BEST(p = 0.04)。

结论

可逆电穿孔与博来霉素联合治疗AVM有效;在患者结果方面,BEET往往优于BEST。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验