Nain Priyanshu, Makram Omar M, Shah Viraj, Hyma Kunhiraman Harikrishnan, Stabellini Nickolas, Datta Biplab, Jiang Stephanie, Patel Vraj, Seth Lakshya, Bhave Aditya, Malik Sarah A, Gong Yan, Fradley Michael G, Leong Darryl P, Harris Ryan A, Hung Yi-Hsin, Lin Austin Yen-Hung, Weintraub Neal L, Guha Avirup
Department of Internal Medicine, Advent Health, Rome, GA 30165, USA.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 30;17(17):2854. doi: 10.3390/cancers17172854.
This study evaluated the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) and its treatments on cardiovascular outcomes in prostate cancer (PC) patients aged 66 years and older, with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) exposure. Using the SEER-Medicare database (2009-2017), two cohorts were created: Cohort 1 included all PC patients enrolled in Medicare Parts A and B; Cohort 2 was a subset of Cohort 1 receiving ADT and enrolled in Medicare Part D. Exposures were DM and DM medications. Outcomes included cardiovascular events (CVEs), cardiovascular mortality (CVm), PC-specific mortality (PCsm), and all-cause mortality, analyzed using multivariable Fine-Gray and Cox models. Cohort 1 included 150,647 PC patients (32% with DM, median age 72). DM was associated with higher risk of CVE (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 1.20, 95% CI 1.17-1.22), CVm (sHR 1.35, 1.28-1.43), and all-cause mortality (adjusted HR [aHR] 1.22, 1.19-1.26) (all < 0.001). Non-Hispanic Blacks (NHBs) and patients from lower socioeconomic (SES) and education areas experienced comparable or worse outcomes. In Cohort 2 ( = 14,938), DM patients on non-metformin therapies had higher all-cause mortality (aHR 1.33, 1.11-1.25; = 0.002) than those on metformin, particularly in NHB and low education groups. Sensitivity analyses with follow-up limited to two years showed consistent results as overall. Diabetic PC patients, especially NHB, lower SES and lower education subgroups, were associated with worse cardiovascular and all-cause mortality outcomes. Metformin may be associated with better outcomes in these populations, warranting further research on the disparities in PC and diabetes, and cardioprotective effects of DM medications across different subpopulations.
本研究评估了糖尿病(DM)及其治疗对66岁及以上前列腺癌(PC)患者心血管结局的影响,这些患者无论是否接受过雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)。利用监测、流行病学和最终结果-医疗保险数据库(2009 - 2017年),创建了两个队列:队列1包括所有参加医疗保险A部分和B部分的PC患者;队列2是队列1中接受ADT并参加医疗保险D部分的一个子集。暴露因素为DM和DM药物。结局包括心血管事件(CVE)、心血管死亡率(CVm)、前列腺癌特异性死亡率(PCsm)和全因死亡率,使用多变量Fine-Gray模型和Cox模型进行分析。队列1包括150,647例PC患者(32%患有DM,中位年龄72岁)。DM与CVE风险较高相关(亚分布风险比[sHR]为1.20,95%置信区间为1.17 - 1.22)、CVm(sHR为1.35,1.28 - 1.43)和全因死亡率(调整后风险比[aHR]为1.22,1.19 - 1.26)(均P < 0.001)。非西班牙裔黑人(NHB)以及来自社会经济地位(SES)较低和教育程度较低地区患者的结局相当或更差。在队列2(n = 14,938)中,接受非二甲双胍治疗的DM患者的全因死亡率(aHR为1.33,1.11 - 1.25;P = 0.002)高于接受二甲双胍治疗的患者,在NHB和低教育程度组中尤其如此。随访限于两年的敏感性分析结果与总体结果一致。糖尿病PC患者,尤其是NHB、SES较低和教育程度较低的亚组,其心血管和全因死亡率结局较差。二甲双胍在这些人群中可能与更好的结局相关,这值得对PC与糖尿病之间的差异以及DM药物在不同亚人群中的心脏保护作用进行进一步研究。