• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国晚期卵巢癌减瘤手术女性患者的手术结局及总生存率趋势:国家癌症数据库分析

Trends in Surgical Outcomes and Overall Survival Among Women Undergoing Debulking Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer in the U.S: Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

作者信息

Lamiman Kelly, Silver Michael, Hayek Judy, Hanusek Ryan, Sarmiento Lea, Kim Michael, Goncalves Nicole, Alagkiozidis Ioannis

机构信息

Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11220, USA.

Department of Gynecologic Oncology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2025 Sep 2;17(17):2884. doi: 10.3390/cancers17172884.

DOI:10.3390/cancers17172884
PMID:40940981
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12427705/
Abstract

Given the rising use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), we sought to assess practice trends in overall survival (OS), complete gross resection (R0), and postoperative mortality following debulking surgery. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify 34,982 stage IIIC and IV EOC patients between 2010 and 2017 who underwent surgery. Annual proportions of patients receiving IDS and PDS were calculated. Median OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Joinpoint models were fitted to evaluate surgical trends. Statistics were performed using SPSS and Joinpoint. Of 34,982 patients, 10,460 (29.9%) underwent IDS. IDS patients were older, more likely to have stage IV disease, and more likely to be non-White. Median OS was higher in the PDS group (54 vs. 38.8 months, < 0.001). Postoperative 90-day mortality was lower in the PDS group (1.7% vs. 2.4%, < 0.001), though IDS patients had a lower 30-day readmission rate (6.2% vs. 3.1%, < 0.001). IDS patients were less likely to undergo extensive surgery (27.4% vs. 36.7%, < 0.001) and more likely to achieve R0 resection (42% vs. 38.6%, < 0.001). The IDS rate increased from 18.9% to 40.6% (annual percentage change (APC): 11.8%, < 0.05) from 2010 to 2017. Median OS improved from 46.6 to 51 months (APC: 1.9%, < 0.05), driven by the PDS cohort. The R0 resection rate rose from 34.8 to 41% (APC: 2.65%, < 0.01), driven by the PDS cohort (APC: 2.83%, < 0.01). Postoperative 90-day mortality decreased from 2.4% to 1.5% (APC: -4.64%, < 0.05), due to a reduction in PDS patients (APC: -6.83%, < 0.05). There was no change in the rate of extensive surgery over time. In conclusion, from 2010 to 2017, increased triage of patients to NACT was accompanied by a higher R0 resection rate and reduced postoperative mortality in PDS patients, with no observed detriment to OS. This data suggests improvement in case selection between IDS and PDS.

摘要

鉴于新辅助化疗(NACT)联合间隔减瘤手术(IDS)在晚期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)中的应用日益增加,我们试图评估减瘤手术后的总生存期(OS)、完全肉眼切除(R0)及术后死亡率的实践趋势。利用国家癌症数据库(NCDB)识别出2010年至2017年间接受手术的34982例IIIC期和IV期EOC患者。计算接受IDS和PDS(初始减瘤手术)患者的年度比例。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计中位OS。采用Joinpoint模型评估手术趋势。使用SPSS和Joinpoint进行统计分析。在34982例患者中,10460例(29.9%)接受了IDS。IDS患者年龄更大,更有可能患有IV期疾病,且更有可能为非白人。PDS组的中位OS更高(54个月对38.8个月,P<0.001)。PDS组术后90天死亡率更低(1.7%对2.4%,P<0.001),尽管IDS患者的30天再入院率更低(6.2%对3.1%,P<0.001)。IDS患者接受广泛手术的可能性更小(27.4%对36.7%,P<0.001),更有可能实现R0切除(42%对38.6%,P<0.001)。从2010年到2017年,IDS率从18.9%升至40.6%(年度百分比变化(APC):11.8%,P<0.05)。在PDS队列的推动下,中位OS从46.6个月提高到51个月(APC:1.9%,P<0.05)。R0切除率从34.8%升至41%(APC:2.65%,P<0.01),由PDS队列推动(APC:2.83%,P<0.01)。术后90天死亡率从2.4%降至1.5%(APC:-4.64%,P<0.05),这是由于PDS患者减少(APC:-6.83%,P<0.05)。随着时间推移,广泛手术率没有变化。总之,从2010年到2017年,将患者更多地分流至NACT伴随着更高的R0切除率以及PDS患者术后死亡率的降低,且未观察到对OS有不利影响。该数据表明在IDS和PDS之间的病例选择有所改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e9/12427705/5483d0b99be4/cancers-17-02884-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e9/12427705/e499c66ac429/cancers-17-02884-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e9/12427705/5483d0b99be4/cancers-17-02884-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e9/12427705/e499c66ac429/cancers-17-02884-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e9/12427705/5483d0b99be4/cancers-17-02884-g002a.jpg

相似文献

1
Trends in Surgical Outcomes and Overall Survival Among Women Undergoing Debulking Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer in the U.S: Analysis of the National Cancer Database.美国晚期卵巢癌减瘤手术女性患者的手术结局及总生存率趋势:国家癌症数据库分析
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Sep 2;17(17):2884. doi: 10.3390/cancers17172884.
2
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
3
Selective Advantage of NACT in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Centre Analysis.新辅助化疗在晚期卵巢癌中的选择性优势:一项回顾性单中心分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Aug 20;61(8):1493. doi: 10.3390/medicina61081493.
4
Ultra-radical (extensive) surgery versus standard surgery for the primary cytoreduction of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.超根治性(广泛)手术与标准手术治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌的初步细胞减灭术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 30;8(8):CD007697. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007697.pub3.
5
Chemotherapy versus surgery for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer.晚期卵巢上皮癌初始治疗中化疗与手术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD005343. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub3.
6
Trends in specific procedures performed at the time of cytoreduction for ovarian cancer: Is interval debulking surgery truly less radical? A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Team Ovary study.卵巢癌细胞减灭术时特定手术操作的趋势:间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术真的不那么激进吗?纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心卵巢研究团队。
Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Aug;187:80-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.05.009. Epub 2024 May 11.
7
Patterns of Recurrence and Clinical Outcome of Patients With Stage IIIC to Stage IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in Complete Response After Primary Debulking Surgery Plus Chemotherapy or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery: An Italian Multicenter Retrospective Study.IIIC期至IV期上皮性卵巢癌患者在初次肿瘤细胞减灭术加化疗或新辅助化疗后行中间型肿瘤细胞减灭术达到完全缓解后的复发模式及临床结局:一项意大利多中心回顾性研究
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 Jan;27(1):28-36. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000843.
8
Primary versus interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: results from a systematic single-center analysis.原发性与间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术治疗晚期卵巢癌的疗效比较:一项系统的单中心分析结果。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 Nov;20(8):1331-40. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181f15714.
9
Textbook oncologic outcome is an easy-to-use composite quality measure that is strongly associated with survival in advanced-stage ovarian cancer.教科书式的肿瘤学结局是一种易于使用的综合质量指标,与晚期卵巢癌的生存率密切相关。
Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Dec;191:86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.09.018. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
10
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for initial treatment in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.晚期上皮性卵巢癌初始治疗中,术前新辅助化疗与手术加化疗的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 10;2(2):CD005343. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub7.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of the National Cancer Database in Identifying Disparities in Cancer Treatment.
Am Surg. 2025 May;91(5):719-722. doi: 10.1177/00031348251329497. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
2
Survival Effect of Maximal Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma During the Platinum Era: A Meta-Analysis.最大程度减瘤术治疗铂类时代晚期卵巢癌的生存效果:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep 1;41(25):4065-4076. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02765.
3
Olaparib plus bevacizumab first-line maintenance in ovarian cancer: final overall survival results from the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial.奥拉帕利联合贝伐珠单抗一线维持治疗卵巢癌:PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 试验的最终总生存结果。
Ann Oncol. 2023 Aug;34(8):681-692. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 19.
4
Overall Survival With Maintenance Olaparib at a 7-Year Follow-Up in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer and a BRCA Mutation: The SOLO1/GOG 3004 Trial.在 BRCA 突变的新诊断晚期卵巢癌患者中,7 年随访期间维持奥拉帕利的总生存期:SOLO1/GOG 3004 试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 20;41(3):609-617. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01549. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
5
Association Between Overall Survival and the Tendency for Cancer Programs to Administer Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer.总体生存与癌症计划对晚期卵巢癌患者实施新辅助化疗倾向之间的关系。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Dec 1;7(12):1782-1790. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4252.
6
Randomized trial of primary debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (SCORPION-NCT01461850).随机试验原发性肿瘤细胞减灭术与新辅助化疗治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌(SCORPION-NCT01461850)。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Nov;30(11):1657-1664. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001640. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
7
Trends in Primary Treatment and Median Survival Among Women With Advanced-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in the US From 2004 to 2016.2004 年至 2016 年美国晚期上皮性卵巢癌女性患者的一线治疗趋势和中位生存情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2017517. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17517.
8
A multimodality triage algorithm to improve cytoreductive outcomes in patients undergoing primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center team ovary initiative.一种多模态分诊算法,旨在提高接受原发性减瘤手术治疗晚期卵巢癌患者的细胞减灭术效果:纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心卵巢倡议团队。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Sep;158(3):608-613. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.041. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
9
Using an evidence-based triage algorithm to reduce 90-day mortality after primary debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.采用基于证据的分诊算法降低高级别上皮性卵巢癌初次肿瘤细胞减灭术后 90 天死亡率。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Oct;155(1):58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
10
Trends in surgical complexity and treatment modalities utilized in the management of ovarian cancer in an era of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.新辅助化疗时代卵巢癌治疗中手术复杂性和治疗方式的变化趋势。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Aug;154(2):283-289. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.05.023. Epub 2019 Jun 11.