Pesapane Filippo, Nicosia Luca, D'Amelio Lucrezia, Quercioli Giulia, Pannarale Mariassunta Roberta, Priolo Francesca, Marinucci Irene, Farina Maria Giorgia, Penco Silvia, Dominelli Valeria, Rotili Anna, Meneghetti Lorenza, Bozzini Anna Carla, Santicchia Sonia, Cassano Enrico
Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, SC Radiologia, IRCCS Cà Granda Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Sep 4;17(17):2901. doi: 10.3390/cancers17172901.
Conventional breast cancer screening programs are predominantly age-based, applying uniform intervals and modalities across broad populations. While this model has reduced mortality, it entails harms-including overdiagnosis, false positives, and missed interval cancers-prompting interest in risk-stratified approaches. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a critical enabler of this paradigm shift. This narrative review examines how AI-driven tools are advancing breast cancer screening toward personalization, with a focus on mammographic risk models, multimodal risk prediction, and AI-enabled clinical decision support. We reviewed studies published from 2015 to 2025, prioritizing large cohorts, randomized trials, and prospective validations. AI-based mammographic risk models generally improve discrimination versus classical models and are being externally validated; however, evidence remains heterogeneous across subtypes and populations. Emerging multimodal models integrate genetics, clinical data, and imaging; AI is also being evaluated for triage and personalized intervals within clinical workflows. Barriers remain-explainability, regulatory validation, and equity. Widespread adoption will depend on prospective clinical benefit, regulatory alignment, and careful integration. Overall, AI-based mammographic risk models generally improve discrimination versus classical models and are being externally validated; however, evidence remains heterogeneous across molecular subtypes, with signals strongest for ER-positive disease and limited data for fast-growing and interval cancers. Prospective trials demonstrating outcome benefit and safe interval modification are still pending. Accordingly, adoption should proceed with safeguards, equity monitoring, and clear separation between risk prediction, lesion detection, triage, and decision-support roles.
传统的乳腺癌筛查项目主要基于年龄,在广泛人群中采用统一的筛查间隔和方式。虽然这种模式降低了死亡率,但也带来了包括过度诊断、假阳性和漏诊间期癌等危害,这促使人们对风险分层方法产生兴趣。近年来,人工智能(AI)已成为这一范式转变的关键推动因素。本叙述性综述探讨了人工智能驱动的工具如何推动乳腺癌筛查向个性化发展,重点关注乳腺X线摄影风险模型、多模态风险预测和人工智能临床决策支持。我们回顾了2015年至2025年发表的研究,优先考虑大型队列研究、随机试验和前瞻性验证。基于人工智能的乳腺X线摄影风险模型通常比经典模型具有更好的区分能力,并且正在进行外部验证;然而,不同亚型和人群的证据仍然存在异质性。新兴的多模态模型整合了遗传学、临床数据和影像学;人工智能也正在临床工作流程中用于分流和个性化筛查间隔的评估。障碍仍然存在——可解释性、监管验证和平等性。广泛采用将取决于前瞻性的临床益处、监管一致性和谨慎的整合。总体而言,基于人工智能的乳腺X线摄影风险模型通常比经典模型具有更好的区分能力,并且正在进行外部验证;然而,不同分子亚型的证据仍然存在异质性,雌激素受体阳性疾病的信号最强,而快速生长和间期癌的数据有限。证明有预后益处和安全间隔调整的前瞻性试验仍在进行中。因此,采用该技术应采取保障措施、进行公平性监测,并明确区分风险预测、病变检测、分流和决策支持的作用。