Mafe Alice N, Büsselberg Dietrich
Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Taraba State University, Main Campus, Jalingo 660101, Taraba State, Nigeria.
Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Education City, Qatar Foundation, Doha Metropolitan Area, Doha P.O. Box 22104, Qatar.
Foods. 2025 Sep 1;14(17):3079. doi: 10.3390/foods14173079.
Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is emerging as a significant global health concern, particularly among individuals under the age of 50. This alarming trend has coincided with an increase in the consumption of processed foods that often rely heavily on synthetic preservatives. At the same time, these additives play a critical role in ensuring food safety and shelf life. Growing evidence suggests that they may contribute to adverse gut health outcomes, which is a known risk factor in colorectal cancer development. At the same time, synthetic preservatives serve essential roles such as preventing microbial spoilage, maintaining color, and prolonging shelf life. Natural preservatives, on the other hand, not only provide antimicrobial protection but also exhibit antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. These contrasting functions form the basis of current discussions on their safety and health implications. Despite their widespread use, the long-term health implications of synthetic preservatives remain inadequately understood. This review synthesizes recent clinical, epidemiological, mechanistic, and toxicological data to examine the potential link between synthetic food preservatives and EOCRC. Particular focus is placed on compounds that have been associated with DNA damage, gut microbiota disruption, oxidative stress, and chronic inflammation, which are the mechanisms that collectively increase cancer risk. In contrast, natural preservatives derived from plants and microbes are gaining attention for their antioxidant, antimicrobial, and possible anti-inflammatory effects. While these alternatives show promise, scientific validation and regulatory approval remain limited. This review highlights the urgent need for more rigorous, long-term human studies and advocates for enhanced regulatory oversight. It advocates for a multidisciplinary approach to developing safer preservation strategies and highlights the importance of public education in making informed dietary choices. Natural preservatives, though still under investigation, may offer a safer path forward in mitigating EOCRC risk and shaping future food and health policies.
早发性结直肠癌(EOCRC)正成为一个重大的全球健康问题,尤其是在50岁以下的人群中。这一令人担忧的趋势与加工食品消费的增加同时出现,这些加工食品通常严重依赖合成防腐剂。与此同时,这些添加剂在确保食品安全和保质期方面发挥着关键作用。越来越多的证据表明,它们可能导致不良的肠道健康结果,而这是结直肠癌发展过程中的一个已知风险因素。同时,合成防腐剂起着重要作用,如防止微生物腐败、保持色泽和延长保质期。另一方面,天然防腐剂不仅提供抗菌保护,还具有抗氧化和抗炎特性。这些截然不同的功能构成了当前关于其安全性和健康影响讨论的基础。尽管它们被广泛使用,但合成防腐剂对健康的长期影响仍未得到充分了解。本综述综合了近期的临床、流行病学、机制和毒理学数据,以研究合成食品防腐剂与早发性结直肠癌之间的潜在联系。特别关注那些与DNA损伤、肠道微生物群破坏、氧化应激和慢性炎症相关的化合物,这些机制共同增加了癌症风险。相比之下,源自植物和微生物的天然防腐剂因其抗氧化、抗菌以及可能的抗炎作用而受到关注。虽然这些替代品显示出前景,但科学验证和监管批准仍然有限。本综述强调迫切需要进行更严格的长期人体研究,并主张加强监管监督。它倡导采用多学科方法来制定更安全的保存策略,并强调公众教育在做出明智饮食选择方面的重要性。天然防腐剂虽然仍在研究中,但可能为降低早发性结直肠癌风险以及塑造未来的食品和健康政策提供一条更安全的途径。