• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

敏感性加权乳腺磁共振成像鉴别脓肿与坏死性肿瘤:一项前瞻性评估

Susceptibility-Weighted Breast MRI Differentiates Abscesses from Necrotic Tumors: A Prospective Evaluation.

作者信息

Güven Fadime, Yener Muhammed Halid

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Atatürk University, 25240 Erzurum, Türkiye.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Sep 7;15(17):2260. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15172260.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics15172260
PMID:40941747
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12427832/
Abstract

: Breast abscesses and necrotic masses often show similar peripheral enhancement and a fluid-containing appearance on breast MRI, leading to diagnostic confusion. Accurate differentiation is critical because biopsies that fail to sample the lesion wall may yield false-negative results, may be misinterpreted as an infectious process, and delay diagnosis. Incorporating SWI into the protocol can provide additional clues to malignancy and, when warranted, prompt a second wall-targeted biopsy, thus reducing the risk of delayed cancer diagnosis. : This single-center prospective diagnostic accuracy study included 42 female patients diagnosed between 2022 and 2025 with either necrotic breast tumors or abscesses, confirmed by histopathology. SWI-based Intralesional Susceptibility Score (ILSS), rim morphology, and mean ADC values were evaluated. Statistical analyses included the Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, ROC analysis, DeLong test for comparison of AUCs, and Cohen's kappa for interobserver agreement. : SWI-based ILSS values were significantly higher in necrotic tumors compared to abscesses (mean ILSS: 2.28 vs. 0.85; 95% CI: 1.0-2.0; < 0.001). Smooth hypointense rims were predominantly observed in abscesses (Sensitivity: 63.1%, 95% CI: 0.38-0.83; Specificity: 88.9%, 95% CI: 0.65-0.98; = 0.001). Incomplete rim morphology was more frequent in tumors (Sensitivity: 78.9%, 95% CI: 0.54-0.93; Specificity: 77.8%, 95% CI: 0.52-0.93; < 0.001). The double rim sign was highly specific for abscesses (Specificity: 95.2%, 95% CI: 0.76-0.99 = 0.002). : SWI provides valuable morphological information in differentiating abscesses from necrotic tumors on breast MRI. When used in combination with ADC values, it can enhance diagnostic accuracy.

摘要

乳腺脓肿和坏死性肿块在乳腺磁共振成像(MRI)上常表现出相似的周边强化及含液外观,导致诊断混淆。准确鉴别至关重要,因为未能对病变壁进行取材的活检可能产生假阴性结果,可能被误诊为感染性病变,并延误诊断。将磁敏感加权成像(SWI)纳入检查方案可提供有关恶性肿瘤的额外线索,并在必要时促使进行第二次针对病变壁的活检,从而降低癌症延迟诊断的风险。

本单中心前瞻性诊断准确性研究纳入了42例在2022年至2025年间被诊断为坏死性乳腺肿瘤或脓肿的女性患者,诊断经组织病理学证实。对基于SWI的病灶内敏感性评分(ILSS)、边缘形态及平均表观扩散系数(ADC)值进行了评估。统计分析包括曼-惠特尼U检验、卡方检验、ROC分析、用于比较曲线下面积(AUC)的德龙检验以及用于评估观察者间一致性的科恩kappa系数。

与脓肿相比,坏死性肿瘤的基于SWI的ILSS值显著更高(平均ILSS:2.28对0.85;95%置信区间:1.0 - 2.0;P < 0.001)。光滑低信号边缘在脓肿中更为常见(敏感性:63.1%,95%置信区间:0.38 - 0.83;特异性:88.9%,95%置信区间:0.65 - 0.98;P = 0.001)。不完整的边缘形态在肿瘤中更为常见(敏感性:78.9%,95%置信区间:0.54 - 0.93;特异性:77.8%,95%置信区间:0.52 - 0.93;P < 0.001)。双边缘征对脓肿具有高度特异性(特异性:95.2%,95%置信区间:0.76 - 0.99;P = 0.002)。

SWI在乳腺MRI上鉴别脓肿与坏死性肿瘤时提供了有价值的形态学信息。与ADC值联合使用时,可提高诊断准确性。

相似文献

1
Susceptibility-Weighted Breast MRI Differentiates Abscesses from Necrotic Tumors: A Prospective Evaluation.敏感性加权乳腺磁共振成像鉴别脓肿与坏死性肿瘤:一项前瞻性评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Sep 7;15(17):2260. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15172260.
2
Presence of Fragmented Intratumoral Thrombosed Microvasculature in the Necrotic and Peri-Necrotic Regions on SWI Differentiates IDH Wild-Type Glioblastoma From IDH Mutant Grade 4 Astrocytoma.磁敏感加权成像(SWI)上坏死及坏死周边区域存在瘤内破碎血栓形成的微血管,可将异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)野生型胶质母细胞瘤与IDH突变型4级星形细胞瘤区分开来。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Jul;62(1):258-270. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29695. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Intraoperative frozen section analysis for the diagnosis of early stage ovarian cancer in suspicious pelvic masses.术中冰冻切片分析用于诊断可疑盆腔肿块中的早期卵巢癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 1;3(3):CD010360. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010360.pub2.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
Treatments for breast abscesses in breastfeeding women.哺乳期妇女乳房脓肿的治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 17;2015(8):CD010490. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010490.pub2.
7
Variation within and between digital pathology and light microscopy for the diagnosis of histopathology slides: blinded crossover comparison study.数字病理学与光学显微镜检查在组织病理学切片诊断中的内部及相互间差异:双盲交叉对比研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(30):1-75. doi: 10.3310/SPLK4325.
8
123I-MIBG scintigraphy and 18F-FDG-PET imaging for diagnosing neuroblastoma.用于诊断神经母细胞瘤的123I-间碘苄胍闪烁扫描术和18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层显像
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 29;2015(9):CD009263. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009263.pub2.
9
Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of axillary lymph node metastases in early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和磁共振成像(MRI)在早期乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移评估中的应用:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Jan;15(4):iii-iv, 1-134. doi: 10.3310/hta15040.
10
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue® (sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles) compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the characterisation of focal liver lesions and detection of liver metastases: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.超声造影使用声诺维®(六氟化硫微泡)与对比增强计算机断层扫描和对比增强磁共振成像在局灶性肝脏病变的特征描述和肝转移检测中的比较:系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Apr;17(16):1-243. doi: 10.3310/hta17160.

本文引用的文献

1
Standardization and advancements efforts in breast diffusion-weighted imaging.乳腺扩散加权成像的标准化及进展工作
Jpn J Radiol. 2025 Mar;43(3):347-354. doi: 10.1007/s11604-024-01696-z. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
2
MRI differentiation of CNS fungal infections: correlating imaging features with microbiological and histopathological findings.中枢神经系统真菌感染的磁共振成像鉴别:影像学特征与微生物学及组织病理学结果的相关性
Neuroradiology. 2025 Jan;67(1):25-36. doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03510-z. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
3
Risk factors of non-diagnostic percutaneous liver tumor biopsy: a single-center retrospective analysis of 938 biopsies based on cause of error.
非诊断性经皮肝肿瘤活检的危险因素:基于错误原因对938例活检进行的单中心回顾性分析
Jpn J Radiol. 2025 Apr;43(4):696-705. doi: 10.1007/s11604-024-01703-3. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
4
The breast cancer that wasn't: Breast abscess mimicking malignancy.并非乳腺癌:酷似恶性肿瘤的乳腺脓肿
Radiol Case Rep. 2024 Oct 23;20(1):201-204. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.09.120. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
Performance of Diffusion-weighted Imaging-based Noncontrast MRI Protocols for Diagnosis of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于弥散加权成像的非对比 MRI 方案在乳腺癌诊断中的性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Radiology. 2024 May;311(2):e232508. doi: 10.1148/radiol.232508.
6
Case report: Poorly differentiated breast carcinoma presenting as a breast abscess.
Radiol Case Rep. 2024 Apr 4;19(6):2508-2513. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.02.071. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Primary Malignant Melanoma of the Breast Presenting as a Breast Abscess: A Case Report.表现为乳腺脓肿的原发性乳腺恶性黑色素瘤:一例报告
J Korean Soc Radiol. 2023 May;84(3):763-769. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2022.0014. Epub 2023 May 9.
8
Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis or Breast Cancer? A Comparative MRI Study in Patients Presenting with Non-Mass Enhancement.特发性肉芽肿性乳腺炎还是乳腺癌?非肿块强化表现患者的MRI对比研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 19;13(8):1475. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13081475.
9
Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Higher-Than-Average Risk: Updated Recommendations From the ACR.美国放射学会更新的高风险女性乳腺癌筛查推荐建议。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2023 Sep;20(9):902-914. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 May 5.
10
Comparison of the Efficacy of Systemic Versus Local Steroid Treatment in Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis: A Cohort Study.特发性肉芽肿性乳腺炎全身与局部激素治疗疗效比较:一项队列研究。
J Surg Res. 2022 Oct;278:86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.04.015. Epub 2022 May 17.