Ahn Jong-Hak, Choi Jae-Won
Department of Dental Laboratory Science, College of Health Science, Catholic University of Pusan, 57 Oryundae-ro, Geumjeong-gu, Busan 46252, Republic of Korea.
Materials (Basel). 2025 Sep 5;18(17):4173. doi: 10.3390/ma18174173.
This study investigated the effect of the internal design and layer thickness on 3D-printed dental models. The internal designs were classified based on the presence or absence of the palatal surface (Opened or Closed palate) and the outer wall thickness (1 mm, 3 mm, and Full). They were named as follows: O1, O3, OF, C1, C3, and CF. Based on the internal design and layer thickness (50 and 100 µm), a total of 12 experimental groups were created (n = 120). The control group was fabricated using dental stone (n = 10). The measurement sites were defined as follows: the mesiodistal width (MD) and occlusocervical height (OC) of the crown and the intercanine width (ICW) and intermolar width (IMW). Statistical significance was tested using a two-way ANOVA, one-way ANOVA, and independent sample -test (α = 0.05). In comparisons with and without palatal surfaces, O3 and C3 showed a similar accuracy ( > 0.05) in the MD and OC, but C3 showed better ( < 0.05) or similar values ( > 0.05) than O3 in the ICW and IMW. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference between OF and CF in all measurement sites ( > 0.05). In comparisons of the outer wall thickness, CF showed a higher accuracy than C1 at all measurement sites ( < 0.05), whereas no statistical significance was observed between CF and C3 except for the ICW ( > 0.05). OF and CF did not show statistical significance according to the layer thickness at all measurement sites ( > 0.05). In all measurement sites except OC, the experimental group showed a superior ( < 0.05) or similar accuracy than the control group ( > 0.05). Within the limitations of this study, a 3 mm outer wall, including the palatal surface, and a 50 µm layer thickness is recommended as the optimal 3D printing condition for dental model fabrication.
本研究调查了内部设计和层厚对3D打印牙科模型的影响。内部设计根据是否存在腭面(开放或封闭腭)和外壁厚度(1mm、3mm和全厚)进行分类。它们的命名如下:O1、O3、OF、C1、C3和CF。根据内部设计和层厚(50和100µm),共创建了12个实验组(n = 120)。对照组使用牙科石膏制作(n = 10)。测量部位定义如下:牙冠的近远中宽度(MD)和咬合颈高度(OC)以及尖牙间宽度(ICW)和磨牙间宽度(IMW)。使用双向方差分析、单向方差分析和独立样本检验(α = 0.05)进行统计学显著性检验。在有和没有腭面的比较中,O3和C3在MD和OC方面显示出相似的精度(> 0.05),但在ICW和IMW方面,C3显示出比O3更好(< 0.05)或相似的值(> 0.05)。同时,OF和CF在所有测量部位均无显著差异(> 0.05)。在外壁厚度的比较中,CF在所有测量部位均显示出比C1更高的精度(< 0.05),而除ICW外,CF和C3之间未观察到统计学显著性(> 0.05)。OF和CF在所有测量部位根据层厚均未显示出统计学显著性(> 0.05)。在除OC外的所有测量部位,实验组显示出比对照组更高(< 0.05)或相似的精度(> 0.05)。在本研究的局限性内,建议将包括腭面的3mm外壁和50µm的层厚作为牙科模型制作的最佳3D打印条件。