Arnold Christin, Riß Lea, Hey Jeremias, Schweyen Ramona
Department of Prosthodontics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 16, 06112 Halle, Germany.
Materials (Basel). 2024 Jul 22;17(14):3616. doi: 10.3390/ma17143616.
Even in digital workflows, models are required for fitting during the fabrication of dental prostheses. This study examined the influence of different parameters on the dimensional accuracy of three-dimensionally printed models. A stereolithographic data record was generated from a master model (SOLL). With digital light processing (DLP) and stereolithography (SLA) printing systems, 126 models were produced in several printing runs-SolFlex350 (S) (DLP, = 24), CaraPrint 4.0 (C) (DLP, = 48) and Form2 (F) (SLA, = 54)-and their accuracy was compared with plaster and milled polyurethane models. In addition to the positioning on the build platform, a distinction was made between parallel and across arrangement of the models to the printer's front, solid and hollow models, and printing with and without support structures. For accuracy assessment, five measurement sections were defined on the model (A-E) and measured using a calibrated digital calliper and digital scans in combination with the GOM Inspect Professional software 2021. The mean deviation between the measurement methods for all distances was 79 µm. The mean deviation of the models from the digital SOLL model were 207.1 µm for the S series, 25.1 µm for the C series and 141.8 µm for the F series. While positioning did not have an influence, there were clinically relevant differences mainly regarding the choice of printer, but also individually in alignment, model structure and support structures.
即使在数字工作流程中,制作牙科修复体时仍需要模型进行拟合。本研究考察了不同参数对三维打印模型尺寸精度的影响。从主模型(SOLL)生成了立体光刻数据记录。使用数字光处理(DLP)和立体光刻(SLA)打印系统,分几次打印制作了126个模型——SolFlex350(S)(DLP,n = 24)、CaraPrint 4.0(C)(DLP,n = 48)和Form2(F)(SLA,n = 54)——并将它们的精度与石膏模型和铣削聚氨酯模型进行比较。除了在构建平台上的定位外,还区分了模型相对于打印机正面的平行和交叉排列、实心和空心模型以及有无支撑结构的打印。为了进行精度评估,在模型上定义了五个测量截面(A - E),并使用校准后的数字卡尺和结合GOM Inspect Professional软件2021的数字扫描进行测量。所有距离测量方法之间的平均偏差为79 µm。S系列模型与数字SOLL模型的平均偏差为207.1 µm,C系列为25.1 µm,F系列为141.8 µm。虽然定位没有影响,但主要在打印机的选择方面存在临床相关差异,在对齐方式、模型结构和支撑结构方面也存在个体差异。