• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同三维打印模型的尺寸精度随打印参数变化的函数关系

Dimensional Accuracy of Different Three-Dimensional Printing Models as a Function of Varying the Printing Parameters.

作者信息

Arnold Christin, Riß Lea, Hey Jeremias, Schweyen Ramona

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 16, 06112 Halle, Germany.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2024 Jul 22;17(14):3616. doi: 10.3390/ma17143616.

DOI:10.3390/ma17143616
PMID:39063907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11279353/
Abstract

Even in digital workflows, models are required for fitting during the fabrication of dental prostheses. This study examined the influence of different parameters on the dimensional accuracy of three-dimensionally printed models. A stereolithographic data record was generated from a master model (SOLL). With digital light processing (DLP) and stereolithography (SLA) printing systems, 126 models were produced in several printing runs-SolFlex350 (S) (DLP, = 24), CaraPrint 4.0 (C) (DLP, = 48) and Form2 (F) (SLA, = 54)-and their accuracy was compared with plaster and milled polyurethane models. In addition to the positioning on the build platform, a distinction was made between parallel and across arrangement of the models to the printer's front, solid and hollow models, and printing with and without support structures. For accuracy assessment, five measurement sections were defined on the model (A-E) and measured using a calibrated digital calliper and digital scans in combination with the GOM Inspect Professional software 2021. The mean deviation between the measurement methods for all distances was 79 µm. The mean deviation of the models from the digital SOLL model were 207.1 µm for the S series, 25.1 µm for the C series and 141.8 µm for the F series. While positioning did not have an influence, there were clinically relevant differences mainly regarding the choice of printer, but also individually in alignment, model structure and support structures.

摘要

即使在数字工作流程中，制作牙科修复体时仍需要模型进行拟合。本研究考察了不同参数对三维打印模型尺寸精度的影响。从主模型（SOLL）生成了立体光刻数据记录。使用数字光处理（DLP）和立体光刻（SLA）打印系统，分几次打印制作了126个模型——SolFlex350（S）（DLP，n = 24）、CaraPrint 4.0（C）（DLP，n = 48）和Form2（F）（SLA，n = 54）——并将它们的精度与石膏模型和铣削聚氨酯模型进行比较。除了在构建平台上的定位外，还区分了模型相对于打印机正面的平行和交叉排列、实心和空心模型以及有无支撑结构的打印。为了进行精度评估，在模型上定义了五个测量截面（A - E），并使用校准后的数字卡尺和结合GOM Inspect Professional软件2021的数字扫描进行测量。所有距离测量方法之间的平均偏差为79 µm。S系列模型与数字SOLL模型的平均偏差为207.1 µm，C系列为25.1 µm，F系列为141.8 µm。虽然定位没有影响，但主要在打印机的选择方面存在临床相关差异，在对齐方式、模型结构和支撑结构方面也存在个体差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/56b648f16eb7/materials-17-03616-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/3884b4021979/materials-17-03616-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/e39a95eaeea2/materials-17-03616-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/367775adb1c4/materials-17-03616-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/f1148496c85d/materials-17-03616-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/82bd67c736e6/materials-17-03616-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/29f1a047d719/materials-17-03616-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/6760b45af25d/materials-17-03616-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/c9027003d6e5/materials-17-03616-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/90810e1576ff/materials-17-03616-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/b7dced2e23a9/materials-17-03616-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/9ba7d1136c0e/materials-17-03616-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/404bba8b468e/materials-17-03616-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/430945804d3d/materials-17-03616-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/a21932961af4/materials-17-03616-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/fee52ad71fda/materials-17-03616-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/0e0c0cbdbd92/materials-17-03616-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/06cb63f3ae43/materials-17-03616-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/56b648f16eb7/materials-17-03616-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/3884b4021979/materials-17-03616-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/e39a95eaeea2/materials-17-03616-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/367775adb1c4/materials-17-03616-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/f1148496c85d/materials-17-03616-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/82bd67c736e6/materials-17-03616-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/29f1a047d719/materials-17-03616-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/6760b45af25d/materials-17-03616-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/c9027003d6e5/materials-17-03616-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/90810e1576ff/materials-17-03616-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/b7dced2e23a9/materials-17-03616-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/9ba7d1136c0e/materials-17-03616-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/404bba8b468e/materials-17-03616-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/430945804d3d/materials-17-03616-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/a21932961af4/materials-17-03616-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/fee52ad71fda/materials-17-03616-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/0e0c0cbdbd92/materials-17-03616-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/06cb63f3ae43/materials-17-03616-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e638/11279353/56b648f16eb7/materials-17-03616-g018.jpg

相似文献

1
Dimensional Accuracy of Different Three-Dimensional Printing Models as a Function of Varying the Printing Parameters.不同三维打印模型的尺寸精度随打印参数变化的函数关系
Materials (Basel). 2024 Jul 22;17(14):3616. doi: 10.3390/ma17143616.
2
Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology.内部设计对立体光固化和数字光处理技术 3D 打印模型精度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Sep;130(3):381.e1-381.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.06.029. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
3
Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis.三种不同 3D 打印技术制作全牙弓模型的精度评估：三维分析。
J Prosthodont Res. 2021 Aug 21;65(3):365-370. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPOR_2019_579. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
4
Surface Quality of 3D-Printed Models as a Function of Various Printing Parameters.3D打印模型的表面质量与各种打印参数的关系
Materials (Basel). 2019 Jun 19;12(12):1970. doi: 10.3390/ma12121970.
5
Effect of printing technology, layer height, and orientation on assessment of 3D-printed models.打印技术、层厚和方向对 3D 打印模型评估的影响。
J World Fed Orthod. 2024 Aug;13(4):169-174. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.03.006. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
6
Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy.三维打印技术及打印层厚度对模型精度的影响。
J Orofac Orthop. 2019 Jul;80(4):194-204. doi: 10.1007/s00056-019-00180-y. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
7
Error analysis of stages involved in CBCT-guided implant placement with surgical guides when different printing technologies are used.使用不同打印技术时，CBCT 引导种植手术导板中各阶段的误差分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Nov;132(5):995-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.11.018. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
8
Accuracy of stereolithographically printed digital models compared to plaster models.与石膏模型相比，立体光刻打印数字模型的准确性。
J Orofac Orthop. 2017 Sep;78(5):394-402. doi: 10.1007/s00056-017-0093-1. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
9
Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base.两种不同模型基底设计的 3D 打印机打印模型的精度比较。
J Prosthodont. 2020 Feb;29(2):124-128. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13107. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
10
Accuracy of commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides in dental implantology.商用 3D 打印机在牙科种植术中制作手术导板的准确性。
J Dent. 2022 Feb;117:103909. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103909. Epub 2021 Nov 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of five different 3D printing workflows for dental models comparing industrial and dental desktop printers.五种不同的 3D 打印工作流程用于牙科模型的准确性比较，包括工业级和牙科桌面级打印机。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jun;27(6):2521-2532. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04809-y. Epub 2022 Dec 3.
2
ACCURACY OF INTRAORAL SCANNERS VERSUS TRADITIONAL IMPRESSIONS: A RAPID UMBRELLA REVIEW.口内扫描仪与传统印模的准确性比较：快速伞形综述。
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2022 Sep;22(3):101719. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101719. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
3
In vitro accuracy of digital and conventional impressions in the partially edentulous maxilla.
上颌部分缺牙患者中数字化和传统印模的体外精度。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Nov;26(11):6491-6502. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04598-4. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
4
A comparison of trueness and precision of 12 3D printers used in dentistry.用于牙科的12台3D打印机的准确性和精密度比较。
BDJ Open. 2022 May 26;8(1):14. doi: 10.1038/s41405-022-00108-6.
5
Accuracy of Dental and Industrial 3D Printers.口腔和工业 3D 打印机的精度。
J Prosthodont. 2022 Mar;31(S1):30-37. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13470.
6
Effect of additive manufacturing method and build angle on surface characteristics and Candida albicans adhesion to 3D printed denture base polymers.添加剂制造方法和构建角度对 3D 打印义齿基托聚合物表面特性和白色念珠菌黏附的影响。
J Dent. 2022 Jan;116:103889. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103889. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
7
Temporary 3D printed fixed dental prosthesis materials: Impact of post printing cleaning methods on degree of conversion as well as surface and mechanical properties.临时 3D 打印固定义齿材料：打印后清洁方法对转化率以及表面和机械性能的影响。
Int J Prosthodont. 2021 November/December;34(6):784–795. doi: 10.11607/ijp.7048. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
8
Accuracy of 3-Dimensionally Printed Full-Arch Dental Models: A Systematic Review.三维打印全牙弓牙模的准确性：一项系统评价。
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 20;9(10):3357. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103357.
9
Impact of Aging on the Accuracy of 3D-Printed Dental Models: An In Vitro Investigation.衰老对3D打印牙科模型准确性的影响：一项体外研究。
J Clin Med. 2020 May 12;9(5):1436. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051436.
10
Comparison of the Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Printed Casts, Digital, and Conventional Casts: An In Vitro Study.三维打印模型、数字模型和传统模型准确性的比较：一项体外研究。
Eur J Dent. 2020 Mar;14(2):189-193. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1705243. Epub 2020 Apr 20.