Nißler Daniel, Reimers-Kipping Sabrina, Ingwersen Maja, Berger Frank, Niekrenz Felix, Theis Bernhard, Hielscher Fabian, Franken Philipp, Gaßler Nikolaus, Grimm Marc-Oliver, Teichgräber Ulf, Franiel Tobias
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany.
FUSE-AI GmbH, 20457 Hamburg, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 29;14(17):6111. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176111.
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted biparametric MRI (AI-bpMRI) in detecting prostate cancer (PCa) as a possible replacement for multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) depending on readers' experience. This fully crossed, multireader multicase, single-centre, consecutive study retrospectively included men with suspected PCa. Three radiologists with different levels of experience independently scored each participant's biparametric (bp) MRI, mpMRI, and AI-bpMRI according to the PI-RADS V2.1 classification. The AI-assisted image processing was based on a sequential deep learning network. Histopathological findings were used as a reference. The study evaluated the mean areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) using the jackknife method for covariance. AUCs were tested for non-inferiority of AI-bpMRI to mpMRI (non-inferiority margin: -0.05). A total of 105 men (mean age 66 ± 7 years) were evaluated. AI-bpMRI was non-inferior to mpMRI in detecting both Gleason score (GS) ≥ 3 + 4 PCa (AUC difference: 0.03 [95% CI: -0.03, 0.08], = 0.37) and GS ≥ 3 + 3 PCa (AUC difference: 0.04 [95% CI: -0.01, 0.09], = 0.14) and was superior to bpMRI in detecting GS ≥ 3 + 3 PCa (AUC difference: 0.07 [95% CI: 0.02, 0.12], = 0.004). The benefit of AI-bpMRI was greatest for the readers with low or medium experience (AUC difference in detecting GS ≥ 3 + 4 compared to mpMRI: 0.06 [95% CI: -0.03, 0.14], = 0.19 and 0.06 [95% CI: -0.03, 0.14], = 0.19, respectively). This study indicates that AI-bpMRI detects PCa with a diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of mpMRI.
根据读者经验,评估人工智能辅助双参数磁共振成像(AI-bpMRI)在检测前列腺癌(PCa)方面的诊断准确性,以确定其是否可作为多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)的替代方法。这项完全交叉、多读者多病例、单中心的连续研究回顾性纳入了疑似PCa的男性患者。三名经验水平不同的放射科医生根据PI-RADS V2.1分类,对每位参与者的双参数(bp)MRI、mpMRI和AI-bpMRI进行独立评分。人工智能辅助图像处理基于一个序列深度学习网络。组织病理学结果用作参考。该研究使用刀切法协方差评估受试者操作特征曲线(AUC)下的平均面积。对AI-bpMRI相对于mpMRI的非劣效性进行了AUC检验(非劣效性界值:-0.05)。共评估了105名男性(平均年龄66±7岁)。在检测Gleason评分(GS)≥3+4的PCa(AUC差异:0.03[95%CI:-0.03,0.08],P=0.37)和GS≥3+3的PCa(AUC差异:0.04[95%CI:-0.01,0.09],P=0.14)方面,AI-bpMRI不劣于mpMRI,且在检测GS≥3+3的PCa方面优于bpMRI(AUC差异:0.07[95%CI:0.02,0.12],P=0.004)。对于经验水平低或中等的读者,AI-bpMRI的益处最大(与mpMRI相比,检测GS≥3+4时的AUC差异分别为0.06[95%CI:-0.03,0.14],P=0.19和0.06[95%CI:-0.03,0.14],P=0.19)。这项研究表明,AI-bpMRI检测PCa的诊断准确性与mpMRI相当。